DrMaddVibe
Thursday, March 3, 2016 10:59:09 AM
Since there was a heated discussion in the Netflix thread, I thought it needed it's own.

Here's the link to the Netflix thread that has some good points to it...

http://cigarbid.com/FORUM/c/posts/648645/p/2/Netflix-What-are-you-watching 

Some new evidence popped up that looks like that he was indeed framed.

http://hellogiggles.com/steven-avery-new-evidence-framed/ 

jackconrad
Thursday, March 3, 2016 1:15:12 PM
Who needs a body ?? LMAO!!
DrMaddVibe
Thursday, March 3, 2016 1:19:10 PM
Jack, did you watch the mini-series?

Reason why I ask is because that's a point I thought that didn't make sense. They found no body, but some bone fragments in a burn pit were claimed to be her's from DNA testing. Guess who did the DNA tests?

DrMaddVibe
Thursday, March 3, 2016 1:25:18 PM
I really felt bad for Brendan. His legal counsel was working in concerted effort with the DA's office. What a total travesty, and it made it all the way to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and they still felt it was all on the up and up? Yup.

Wisconsin is one f'd up place to live.

ZRX1200
Thursday, March 3, 2016 1:40:46 PM
Brendan's case was a real heartbreaker.

There was some phone evidence in Steven'so case that wasn't in the documentary, but that was a very thin case as well. What I never got was there was NO BLOOD. If she was brutally murdered with a knife there should have been a bunch.

DrMaddVibe
Thursday, March 3, 2016 1:44:00 PM

Brendan's case was a real heartbreaker.

There was some phone evidence in Steven'so case that wasn't in the documentary, but that was a very thin case as well. What I never got was there was NO BLOOD. If she was brutally murdered with a knife there should have been a bunch.

ZRX1200 wrote:

and shot!

It was a crapfest. The guy had a 34 mil lawsuit and settled for peanuts so he could afford an attorney. He had great representation. I don't know what the f those jurors were thinking or not thinking. Damned shame.

The DA in this...what a douchebag.

DrMaddVibe
Thursday, March 17, 2016 5:35:59 PM
http://hellogiggles.com/evidence-teresa-halbach-bones/ 

There’s evidence to suggest that Teresa Halbach’s bones might not have been hers after all

This just in: There’s been a surprising new twist in the Steven Avery trial. There’s a chance the charred bones found in Avery’s yard—the ones that allegedly belonged to Teresa Halbach—might not actually be hers.

DNA expert Sherry Culhane testified on the matter during Avery’s trial, saying that the partial profile of the bones matched Teresa’s standard. Now, Lynne Blanchard of Stop Wrongful Convictions is calling out the evidence as questionable, and thinks there might be more to the story. Since Culhane only had a partial profile, it cannot be conclusive that the DNA is a perfect match to Teresa’s.

The bone fragments were allegedly found in Avery’s burn pit. Blanchard points out that nobody photographed the collection process—they were just put into boxes and taken away to a crime lab. Technically, the discovery was never documented. In addition, the descriptions of the bones have varied from testimony to testimony.

“Since the scene wasn’t documented, there is no proof that any bones were ever on the Avery property,” Blanchard writes. “As well, the Manitowoc County coroner was forbidden from entering the scene and none of the forensic experts were summoned until after the bones had been removed. We are to simply accept the word of the state witnesses who claimed to see the bones.”

We still don’t know what really happened—sadly, we may never know—but it definitely makes an already poorly-handled case even more fishy. Why wasn’t protocol followed? Where were the forensic anthropologist and the photographer when the evidence was discovered? Many believe that Manitowoc County officials were trying to frame Avery, and this kind of evidence doesn’t help matters.

“The DNA evidence should have been reported more generally as ‘Teresa Halbach can not be excluded as source,’” Blanchard continued. “How is it even possible for tissue to survive a fire that disintegrated 60% of the bone mass? The teeth which are commonly used to identify a body because they outlast bone didn’t even survive the fire. Something’s wrong and it becomes difficult to accept this evidence as presented.”