victor809
8 years ago
.... You idiot.

One of my clients makes a generic competitor to the epipen.... Mylan isn't a monopoly.... You just aren't smart enough to find the other providers. Just because you want the government to do everything for you. Goddamn nanny state libtard.

Canada and Europe have a single point of purchase (the government) which uses its buying power to force the pharma companies to sell at a lower price than they would like. I would expect a liberal like you to want the USA to do something like that. Mexico ... I don't recall if they have a socialist healthcare system or if they just don't have any FDA regulations. But it's one or the other or both.

Now go run along you goddamn socialist...
tailgater
8 years ago
Victor is a right wing nut job.

Speyside
8 years ago
You've seen Victors nuts? They were so impressive you are obsessed with them? Joe, there are psychiatrists who could help you. Victor, send Joe a picture of you nuts. He really needs it.
victor809
8 years ago

You've seen Victors nuts? They were so impressive you are obsessed with them? Joe, there are psychiatrists who could help you. Victor, send Joe a picture of you nuts. He really needs it.

Speyside wrote:



Lucky for him I keep a few photos on my phone. Think he prefers hairy/shaved? close-up? artsy?
tailgater
8 years ago
Lance one off and send it to me like that bicycle racer dude did.

cacman
8 years ago

.One of my clients makes a generic competitor to the epipen.... Mylan isn't a monopoly....

victor809 wrote:


LOL. The EpiPen, manufactured by King, a subsidiary of Pfizer, and marketed by Mylan, has dominated the market with the help of the guberment you idiot. There's only one other manufacturer - Adrenaclick. Many insurance companies will only cover Mylan's product. If the insurance companies can dictate to doctors what drugs patients can be prescribed, then there should be single point of purchase (the government) which uses its buying power to force the pharma companies to sell at a lower price. Instead the guberment and insurance companies incentivize price gouging by Big Pharma. Drugs manufactured in the US should not cost more to US citizens than it does to other Countries. Plain and simple.

In 2015 Mylan had about $1.5B in sales of EpiPens and those sales accounted for 40% of Mylan's profit.[26] Mylan had maintained about a 90% market share since it had acquired the product, and had continually raised the price of EpiPens starting in 2009: in 2009, the wholesale price of two EpiPens was about $100; by July 2013, the price was about $265; in May 2015, it was around $461; and in May 2016, the price rose again to around $609,[25] around a 500% jump from the price in 2009.[75] The cost of the drug and device to Mylan as of 2016 was about $35.[28] In the summer of 2016, as parents prepared to send their children back to school and went to pharmacies to get new EpiPens, people began to express outrage at the cost of the EpiPen and Mylan was widely and harshly criticized.[76][77] In September 2016, the New York State Attorney General began an investigation into Mylan's EpiPen4Schools program in New York to determine if the program's contracts violated antitrust law[78] and the West Virginia State Attorney General opened an investigation into whether Mylan had given the state the correct discount under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and subpoenaed the company when it refused to provide the documentation the state requested.[79] In October 2016, Mylan announced a $465M settlement with the US Department of Justice over rebates paid by Mylan to states under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program.[80]

As of 2015, the following epinephrine autoinjectors were available in various parts of Europe: Adrenalina WZF, Adrenaline (epinephrine) 1 in 1000 solution for injection BP auto-injector, Altellus, Anapen, Emerade, EpiPen, Fastjekt, FastPen, and Jext.[83] As of 2014, three branded products were available in the US: Adrenaclick, Auvi-Q, and EpiPen,[5] but as of October 2015 Auvi-Q was no longer available.[72] They state it will be available again in February 2017.[84] As of 2005, epinephrine autoinjectors were not available in most of the developing world.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epinephrine_autoinjector 


When a Navy veteran who served 2 tours on Battleship 829, and was there during the Cuban Missile Crisis has to chose between buying his medications or buying food, there is a BIG problem.
Phil222
8 years ago

My post wasn't to ban negotiations.
I clearly stated that their stance on forbidding new technology is backwards and part of the reason they've outlived their useful purpose by almost a century now.

And your anti-corporation stance is duly noted.

tailgater wrote:



In the first sentence of your original post, it sounded as if you didn’t like the fact that workers wanted to negotiate for things like wages, benefits, pensions, raises, working conditions, vacations, etc. Specifically, the word “control” is what prompted my post. If that is not what you meant to convey then I apologize for my poor reading comprehension skills. I often can’t even decipher my own posts, so forgive me if I fail to accurately interpret many of yours.

I also wouldn’t consider myself to be “anti-corporation.” I get where you’re coming from with that statement, but pro-worker or pro-small business would be a more accurate description. I definitely understand the job creating and economic benefits that corporations bring to the table. I’m not looking to start sewing my own clothes out of hemp or anything like that.

However, I do get upset when I see certain businesses taking advantage of the things that allowed them to be successful in the first place (e.g. employees, the government, the American people). I’m ultimately just hoping to see Americans with equal representation at the negotiating table, whether that be employment related, or when it’s time for us to write up our new tax-bill.

And I still do not see the problem with these guys negotiating to keep their jobs. Did you expect them to welcome the unemployment line with open arms? Maybe even speed up the process? How would you welcome your demise?
tailgater
8 years ago

In the first sentence of your original post, it sounded as if you didn’t like the fact that workers wanted to negotiate for things like wages, benefits, pensions, raises, working conditions, vacations, etc. Specifically, the word “control” is what prompted my post. If that is not what you meant to convey then I apologize for my poor reading comprehension skills. I often can’t even decipher my own posts, so forgive me if I fail to accurately interpret many of yours.

I also wouldn’t consider myself to be “anti-corporation.” I get where you’re coming from with that statement, but pro-worker or pro-small business would be a more accurate description. I definitely understand the job creating and economic benefits that corporations bring to the table. I’m not looking to start sewing my own clothes out of hemp or anything like that.

However, I do get upset when I see certain businesses taking advantage of the things that allowed them to be successful in the first place (e.g. employees, the government, the American people). I’m ultimately just hoping to see Americans with equal representation at the negotiating table, whether that be employment related, or when it’s time for us to write up our new tax-bill.

And I still do not see the problem with these guys negotiating to keep their jobs. Did you expect them to welcome the unemployment line with open arms? Maybe even speed up the process? How would you welcome your demise?

Phil222 wrote:



Actually, if I'm being honest you were more right than wrong. I do dislike when unions disrupt the supply/demand cycle that defines capitalism at its most basic level.

But why do you feel that every negotiation has to have "equal representation"?
It's not supposed to be equal.
If there are 10 people trying for 1 job, then the employer has the advantage.
If there are 10 jobs but only 1 qualified candidate, then that person has the edge.
Not sure why that's a bad thing.











Phil222
8 years ago

Actually, if I'm being honest you were more right than wrong. I do dislike when unions disrupt the supply/demand cycle that defines capitalism at its most basic level.

But why do you feel that every negotiation has to have "equal representation"?
It's not supposed to be equal.
If there are 10 people trying for 1 job, then the employer has the advantage.
If there are 10 jobs but only 1 qualified candidate, then that person has the edge.
Not sure why that's a bad thing.

tailgater wrote:



It's not a bad thing depending on a person's point of view. We just share different ideologies is all.
victor809
8 years ago

LOL. The EpiPen, manufactured by King, a subsidiary of Pfizer, and marketed by Mylan, has dominated the market with the help of the guberment you idiot. There's only one other manufacturer - Adrenaclick. Many insurance companies will only cover Mylan's product. If the insurance companies can dictate to doctors what drugs patients can be prescribed, then there should be single point of purchase (the government) which uses its buying power to force the pharma companies to sell at a lower price. Instead the guberment and insurance companies incentivize price gouging by Big Pharma. Drugs manufactured in the US should not cost more to US citizens than it does to other Countries. Plain and simple.

cacman wrote:


You're simply wrong. I'm not going to name them, but there is other producers besides mylan and amedra.
You're now complaining that the government is helping Mylan hold a monopoly? and your fix is to create a government single payer? You realize if the government is the only buyer, they will practically reinforce the monopoly you think exists, right? And your entire rationale is that "drugs manufactured in the US should not cost more to US citizens than it does to other countries"? That's a dumb rationale. It sounds a lot like the same rationale hippies use to justify single payer healthcare "If getting my appendix removed is cheaper in canada than it is in the USA we should have single payer!!!!"

You're a full blown socialist libtard cacman. Go take away people's guns somewhere else....



In 2015 Mylan had about $1.5B in sales of EpiPens and those sales accounted for 40% of Mylan's profit.[26] Mylan had maintained about a 90% market share since it had acquired the product, and had continually raised the price of EpiPens starting in 2009: in 2009, the wholesale price of two EpiPens was about $100; by July 2013, the price was about $265; in May 2015, it was around $461; and in May 2016, the price rose again to around $609,[25] around a 500% jump from the price in 2009.[75] The cost of the drug and device to Mylan as of 2016 was about $35.[28] In the summer of 2016, as parents prepared to send their children back to school and went to pharmacies to get new EpiPens, people began to express outrage at the cost of the EpiPen and Mylan was widely and harshly criticized.[76][77] In September 2016, the New York State Attorney General began an investigation into Mylan's EpiPen4Schools program in New York to determine if the program's contracts violated antitrust law[78] and the West Virginia State Attorney General opened an investigation into whether Mylan had given the state the correct discount under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and subpoenaed the company when it refused to provide the documentation the state requested.[79] In October 2016, Mylan announced a $465M settlement with the US Department of Justice over rebates paid by Mylan to states under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program.[80]

As of 2015, the following epinephrine autoinjectors were available in various parts of Europe: Adrenalina WZF, Adrenaline (epinephrine) 1 in 1000 solution for injection BP auto-injector, Altellus, Anapen, Emerade, EpiPen, Fastjekt, FastPen, and Jext.[83] As of 2014, three branded products were available in the US: Adrenaclick, Auvi-Q, and EpiPen,[5] but as of October 2015 Auvi-Q was no longer available.[72] They state it will be available again in February 2017.[84] As of 2005, epinephrine autoinjectors were not available in most of the developing world.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epinephrine_autoinjector 



what's your point? They make a product. Perhaps it cost a lot to produce. I can tell you the generic made at my client is a fully manual assembly. The entire autoinjector has to be assembled by hand, using expensive american labor. But a commie like you doesn't care how much something costs to get out onto the market. You only care that people might need it and use that as a driver for price.



When a Navy veteran who served 2 tours on Battleship 829, and was there during the Cuban Missile Crisis has to chose between buying his medications or buying food, there is a BIG problem.



Need doesn't justify price except in a socialist environment.

Hell, I just went to the client website for the epinephrine... they have a statement on the front page saying "In all states you or your physician can request a prescription for XXXX" and says in many states it can be substituted for EpiPen... so I'm not sure why you think there's no other options.
MACS
8 years ago
I'm in a union, and I do not like it. They take my money, and provide me with little to no benefit for it. We have been "imposed upon" twice in my 10 years in it (where they can't reach an agreement, go to impasse, and the county just dictates what we'll get).

I can choose to tell them to suck eggs... but if I do, I have no legal protection if I need it.
victor809
8 years ago

I'm in a union, and I do not like it. They take my money, and provide me with little to no benefit for it. We have been "imposed upon" twice in my 10 years in it (where they can't reach an agreement, go to impasse, and the county just dictates what we'll get).

I can choose to tell them to suck eggs... but if I do, I have no legal protection if I need it.

MACS wrote:



I hear they also force you to buy mylan's epipen.
MACS
8 years ago
No... no... they did buy a new building for 1.8 million dollars, though. So we got that going for us, I guess. You know, the members of the union benefit greatly from cushy new offices and stuff.

Oh... wait, no. Only the union reps benefit from that.

There's some seriously shady sh*t going on in our union. I wish I knew how to get them audited. Maybe I should ask bloodsport how he got teedub audited?
Phil222
8 years ago
Do you think that you would have better pay and benefits if you weren't in a union?
delta1
8 years ago
careful MACS...popo unions are among the strongest in the nation...there's a Peace Officer's Bill of Rights that is patterned after the national LEOBR and codified into CA law...
victor809
8 years ago

careful MACS...popo unions are among the strongest in the nation...there's a Peace Officer's Bill of Rights that is patterned after the national LEOBR and codified into CA law...

delta1 wrote:



they're probably monitoring his cbid posts as it is.
teedubbya
8 years ago
I think you have to cry and stuff
MACS
8 years ago

Do you think that you would have better pay and benefits if you weren't in a union?

Phil222 wrote:



Better? No. Comparable and fair? Likely, yes.

The job requires we pass a detailed background, psyche test, and polygraph, as well as physical agility and then an academy. I think the pool of qualified applicants willing to do the job is small enough that they have to make it worth their while.
frankj1
8 years ago

Victor is a right wing nut job.

tailgater wrote:


you thought I've been kidding?
tailgater
8 years ago
Friggin Cacman.

Making me agree with victor.

I'll get even with you, Cacman.

You'll rue the day!



Users browsing this topic