My college mascot was the Chiefs.
It is now the Riverhawks.
It was changed because it was "racist".
A native American chief with full head dress was our logo.
It's now a cartoon fictional bird.
I watched the protests.
Even Elizabeth Warren wasn't there.
It was other people being offended FOR the Indians that created the controversy.
"We shouldn't use depictions of sacred warriors in sports"
that was the battle cry.
By people who obviously have never been to a casino in Connecticut.
If Cleveland wants to change the mascot, fine. It was kinda hokey anyhow.
But I'm sick of hearing about how the "history" somehow taints today's meaning.
The cartoon indian began as a racist joke? Fine.
Today it meant "Cleveland's MLB team". Nothing more. Nothing less.
If we have to default to the original intent then we should be able to use swastika logo's because the nazi's didn't invent them, they merely adopted them.
It's a slippery slope.
But in the mean time, kudos to Cleveland.
Maybe they can get a real logo now.
Like a flying elvis...
Edited by user
8 years ago |
Reason: Not specified