Gronk is a great TE.

Safety not so much.....

ZRX1200 wrote:

^I want to be Jamie's next date.

TW wrote:

I don't mind Gronk defending a TRUE hail mary play.
But I don't think anybody felt Tannehill (sp?) could reach the end zone. They HAD to play it short like they did.
Putting Gronk in there made zero sense, considering.

Still.
That's a fun ending if you're not a Pats fan.

tailgater wrote:

Why have Gronk on the field and McCourty on the bench? 😕

RMAN4443 wrote:

Why have Gronk on the field and McCourty on the bench? 😕

RMAN4443 wrote:

because the conventional play was a hail mary, and Gronk excels at those...BB prolly hoped they would throw a short pass by putting Gronk in, since the odds of those turning into game winners are less than hail mary passes...whoda thunk the play would force Gronk to be a safety because the other 10 defenders didn't do their jobs...

delta1 wrote:

we're on to Pittsburgh

frankj1 wrote:

Dat is gonna be an important game.......for da Steelers.
Looks like this end of game fubar stunt may cost the Pats home field........and that could be big.

KingoftheCove wrote:

From the BB post game press conference:
You'd like to think that, wouldn't you?! You've beaten my giant, which means you're exceptionally strong, so you could've put the poison in your own goblet, trusting on your strength to save you, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you! But, you've also bested my Spaniard, which means you must have studied, and in studying you must have learned that man is mortal, so you would have put the poison as far from yourself as possible, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me!

I never knew Belichick was Sicilian...

tailgater wrote: