Okay who took allbidness' meds?

They better not..let me at 'em.

Did you read about BUSH and TED's gay tryst?

PIEHOLE BUSH TRYST HARARAR

Now I know he's off his meds, he never makes this much sense! LOL

Hey rug

You're all set for when they make rugs illegal with that handle. Of course, then only criminals will have toups.

LMAO! Wrong kinda rug. I've moved on to tile anyway....

Piehole IS a funny word!

So is mirkin.

Ruggy, you tell Allbidness(sp?) that mirkins are the wave of the future.

There's no reason to be ashamed of male pattern pubic baldness anymore!

When they outlaw mirkins, guess who'll be the only ones with extensive flora down there?

Well, besides French women.

Yeah, that's right, criminals and those two guys with the white tiger act in Vegas.

Oooops, I'm getting worked up again, aren't I?

Goooonite!

Does anyone have an Arguement if the next Nomination is for a Judge who withhold the Constitution of these United States??

If you do have a problem with that.. Take door #2 and F* yerself instead of the rest of this Country..

If you don't then there shouldn't be a discussion/debate on the issue!

Hog

"those two guys with the white tiger act in Vegas"

Thats not a mirkin Blood that would be a codpiece

Being a Spaniard I would think you would know that.. They were all the rage during Queen Isabellas reign

LOL!

Yeah, I wear mine to my interpretative jazz dance class every saturday.

Thank gooness, they come in 3XLg.

Ooooooooooogah!

I got a "what if" for you...

What if elephants could fly? That would be a pretty big phuckin' bird and we'd all spend alot more time washing our cars...

My mom used to say that.

What I don't get is why we get so heated over this stuff. The guys in Washington are all politicians. A democrat will take a "political contribution" just as likely as a republican. I see the exact same thing go on at the corner of Hollywood and Vine, but those ladies don't pretend to anything more than the prostitutes they are.

The part that miffs me is we keep voting these a$$holes into office. We as Americans will never agree on every issue, but these politicians turn EVERY issue into an "us versus them" ****fest. Let's get the issues we can all agree on worked out (healthcare, education, etc.) and worry about the rest after that.

Everyone knows Teddy is a drunken liberal, and we all equally know that GW is a drunken/drugged up conservative. What's the difference? Nothing! They both get rich (well they were rich before) by milking the political system. Meanwhile the American people are getting screwed by big business (drug companies, health insurance providers, etc).

I'm tired of the drunks, drug addicts, and morally corrupt in washington deciding my country's fate. Who's with me? Get those AKs, ARs, and molotavs ready America!

Viva La Revolucion'!

jcwbnimble.

What if we all studied constitutional law so that we could have an informed and educated opinion on who is qualified and not qualified to be a Supreme Court justice? Not enough time between now and October? Well I guess that we will just have to depend on our elected Senators to do the job for us. Oh, you didn't vote for the Senator in your state, I guess you don't have a voice after all...funny how all this works…now what is the name of that document that spells all of this out?

=========================================

Author: Buckwheat Date: 07/07/2005 02:05 PM

What if we all studied constitutional law so

that we could have an informed and educated

opinion on who is qualified and not qualified

to be a Supreme Court justice? Not enough time

between now and October? Well I guess that we

will just have to depend on our elected Senators

to do the job for us. Oh, you didn't vote for the Senator in your state, I guess you don't have a

voice after all ...

===========================================

No one ever intended for the voters to judge who's qualified or who's not ... but it WAS intended for the Senate to be making decisions based on judicial qualification, not the POLITICS of proposed candidates ...

And no, I did NOT vote for the senators who 'represent' California ... neither of them represents me in the faintest ...

Interesting reading of Article II, Section 2. I see Advice and Consent but not judicial qualification. I knew I must be dyslexic.