I don't think so... if you communicated with him knowing what he does to chickens and other assorted waterfowl you 'd become a chikens and assorted waterfowl abuser also... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

Bloody?

dstieger wrote:

I have never heard a compelling argument against 'outlawing' 100 round mags like the Dayton POS used. (I'm also fine with finding a way to restrict or eliminate AK/AR style weapons, though I understand the challenges in writing such a law.) Limiting mags to 5 or 10 on all small arms makes too much sense to me...hard to believe it hasn't been enacted more widely already. I fully recognize it isn't going to prevent but jobs from killing people. But it just might limit some casualties without any Constitutional problems, IMO.

If I go duck hunting I have to plug my shotgun so I can't load more than three shells for chrissakes....never considered that a Second ammendment infringement

dstieger wrote:

Not a fan of the 50 round drums. I prefer a few 30s.

teedubbya wrote:

Unweildly and less reliable. 30-35 is the sweet spot to me. You can swap in a second or so.

teedubbya wrote: