Good to hear Puddin.
But I refuse to patronize those basturds anymore...
izonfire wrote:
Yes, it's very frustrating when quality and flavor take a nosedive after an OR, with subsequent runs being nowhere even close. Also frustrating when a cigar from a particular vendor seems very inferior to that "same" cigar sold by most or all other vendors.
This problem is quite fixable though, with a website that crowdsources multi-factor (draw, construction, burn, flavor) reports with numeric quality ratings for each factor (1-5 perhaps), all from trusted reviewers, with each report including acquisition date, smoking date and source vendor.
Then the information is presented in boiled-down chart form, revealing all the data-mined truths in their full glory, all at a single glance.
Wow, look, cigar X sucks from vendor A, but seems great from every other vendor. Cigar Y was good for the first year, then took a quality nosedive. Gee, now I know exactly what and where to buy to not get hosed!
It'd be an interesting project. Not at all difficult for a good web developer, either.
.
Edited by user
6 years ago |
Reason: Not specified