Gene363
6 years ago
A pretty good summary, unfortunately, it will not satisfy the self absorbed haters.
fishinguitarman
6 years ago
And there’s a lot of those here sadly
victor809
6 years ago
I mean.... it's a perspective.

Not a particularly accurate one... and a bit "deep state"-ey

And completely neglects congress. Which is also beholden to its voters.
Mr. Jones
6 years ago
Well vickeeeeeee.....

A.N.Y.O.N.E. WHO DOESN'T BELIEVE IN
"THE DEEP STATE" IS A REALLY IGNORANT IDIOT...

JUST LIKE FBI-SSG FIELD CHIEF GARY O'CONNOR
wHo iS "down UnDeR iN aUSSie unDEr lanD" dancinG
Wit' beeee-ELLLL-zaaaa-BUUUUUB
frankj1
6 years ago
but if everyone knows about them, they can't be a deep secret.
victor809
6 years ago
A super secret Deep State that everyone knows about... populated by long employed establishment agents who are anti-republican but are in agencies which have historically hired from the army and police.

forgive my disbelief.
dstieger
6 years ago
Some random thoughts that went through my mind while reading it....I don't necessarily have answers or opinions on all of them, but I think the writer should consider some of them on his or her follow up piece

-Is the president only beholden to those that voted for him?

-Is the president just as obligated to protecting future Americans as voters? If voters (maybe 20% of population?) demand the president do something that 80% of the population believe is shortsighted and detrimental to the future....should he do it?

-Isn't it possible that America's long term best interests might best be served with some short term concessions to global or foreign interests?

-I do agree that subordination from within a branch is toxic -- lawful orders must be followed; loyalty is important - not more important than laws and regulations and lawful acts, but important; but I will often give the benefit of the doubt to whistleblower-type claims if I think they're done in good faith and there may just be questions of interpretation
Users browsing this topic