So then why aren't relative and general physics the same in this case? Do you want to postulate that dark matter there is moving faster than the speed of light? Or light moves faster there? Or just velocity has no reference point there? Remember megapersec. Philistine!

Speyside wrote:

So you think space time actually contracts? I say it appears to contract. Now your probably going to tell me the big bang fairy tale? Tell me, what existed before the big bang? Pure energy? Random matter and anti matter? Make it a good fairy tale please. Now if you only understood quantum gravity. Wait for it..............if you understood quantum gravity it would no longer be quantum gravity.

Speyside wrote:

My girlfriend always called me the "Big Bang". Trust me, that is no fairy tale baby. Legendary the world over. 👍

USNGunner wrote:

was that your "pro" name...I think we worked together.

frankj1 wrote:

was that your "pro" name...I think we worked together.

frankj1 wrote:

Not to split hairs, but your argument. You are referring to something fascinating with ligo. But 2 event horizons are not comparable to the outer edge of the known universe. Also your magnitude is wrong. When you think Ligo, think in persecs. When you think outer edge think megapersecs. To the best of my knowledge, which granted we are streching here, Ligo gravitational wave mesurments to date are about 50 and always deal with event horizons. So I ask you, what does this have to do with general, it seems solely relative in nature.

Speyside wrote:

It's possible. Atlantic City? In the hey-day? 🤔

USNGunner wrote:

If I were to get an intestinal parasite, I would have and 8trackdisco Tape Worm.

8trackdisco wrote: