Very interesting, this is a rabbit hole I'll go down. What's your day job?
Then we'll get back to your belief about logic. I'm sure we can agree on a suitable definition of the car Schroeder's cat won't stay put

Dg west deptford wrote:

I'm a computer programmer, I write logical statements all day long. I know, sounds boring to most people.

Schrödinger's cat will stay put if you give it enough drugs...

bgz wrote:

So you believe nothing created everything?

Dg west deptford wrote:

the person asking the questions controls the interview, or the sales process.
One -call closers do it best.
Cult leaders and recruiters are even better

frankj1 wrote:

I'm so glad I grew up a plain old sinner. I find religious upbringing to be woefully inoculating to truth.
So you believe nothing created everything? That's crazier than Zeus, Ra or Aliens for sure!

Dg west deptford wrote:

I could give you great evidence for God. The peer reviewed science coming out of the institute for creation research (www.icr.org)is awesome! But if I give you evidence I elevate you to the position of Judge and who's on trial? The Lord of Glory. So I won't give you evidence for something you already know but deny because you don't want to be accountable to a Holy, loving Creator.

Dg west deptford wrote:

Is no one going to touch this? "Peer reviewed science" that gives evidence of god....?

victor809 wrote:

Is no one going to touch this? "Peer reviewed science" that gives evidence of god....?

victor809 wrote:

Actually I was waiting for the peer reviewed science that proves there is no master plan of the universe, that there is no greater intelligence at work, call it God, Nature or whatever. Of course to do that would discredit the scientists themselves as frauds since their premise would have to start with there is no truth, therefore no science at all, so whatever these self important, self deified experts, these puny humans propose is bunk by their own definition.

RayR wrote: