b, I don't need to assume you believe in universal unchanging logic. I already KNOW you do. But it's just so good to admit it out loud in front of witnesses. Sometimes you have to rescue the mind from absurdity before one can receive truth
You've already professed faith in the existence of Absolute truth & that you KNOW some things to be true. Which is the beginning of a great foundation. You're so close! If you could just confess faith in logic then I could ask the final question

Dg west deptford wrote:

All good D, I knew you had no game. Kinda lost interest anyway... you overhyped it and under-delivered.

bgz wrote:

First.. eventually you'll hit my limits... soooooo

Stars are formed in nebula.... down the chain, you're right back at supernova.

Follow the chicken egg back far enough, you'll hit some sort of raptor....

That's about enough splainin I'm willing to do. You want more, go read a book...

bgz wrote:

Yup, well you can travel back in time as far back as you can imagine and never find that limit, never find the ultimate truth.
All the haughty god-like logic and science, all the theories that some humans believe are indisputable are regularly disputed and new theories are presented. Then there are some things that mere mortals can never truly know.
There is certainly no scientific consensus about the origins of all things, Michael Crichton wrote about the claims about consensus in science, "There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period.”, “Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus."
If someone claims there is a scientific consensus, then you've found a charlatan, a political actor.

Where does Joe Biden fit into all this? He's a charlatan of course!

RayR wrote:

All good D, I knew you had no game. Kinda lost interest anyway... you overhyped it and under-delivered.

bgz wrote:

Yup, well you can travel back in time as far back as you can imagine and never find that limit, never find the ultimate truth.
All the haughty god-like logic and science, all the theories that some humans believe are indisputable are regularly disputed and new theories are presented. Then there are some things that mere mortals can never truly know.
There is certainly no scientific consensus about the origins of all things, Michael Crichton wrote about the claims about consensus in science, "There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period.”, “Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus."
If someone claims there is a scientific consensus, then you've found a charlatan, a political actor.

Where does Joe Biden fit into all this? He's a charlatan of course!

RayR wrote:

How can I under-deliver when we haven't reached the end yet?
Your quitting now? Figures. Do you say you lost interest in your math games when you sense you're loosing also?

You claim to live in a world where you can't know where you parked your car because it could be in super-position but I'm the one with no game?
Oh well, I still had fun but this really is no game to me. I actually care about you. Well Christ in me cares about you. I'm a selfish prick.
Really wish you could've pressed through to the end for the summation of the logic apologetic but no sweat. I understand. Hopefully someone someday will have the balls and honesty to admit that they believe in truth, knowledge, logic & that logic is an immaterial entity then we can see the end of the matter.
I do appreciate all of you for putting up with me and if you ever need prayer or an ear please avail your self of the love I have for you & I'll do the same trusting your heart for me as well.
God bless & see you tomorrow.

Dg west deptford wrote:

All good D, I knew you had no game. Kinda lost interest anyway... you overhyped it and under-delivered.

bgz wrote:

How can I under-deliver when we haven't reached the end yet?

Dg west deptford wrote:

where were his hands..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:

Spit your game already, let's hear the pitch.

In the words of the giant head thing on Rick and Morty...

Show me what you got.

bgz wrote: