Told ya months ago, guess what they won. Just look at the absentee ballot trend by states. I think Nevada will remain blue, Arizona will flip red, and Noth Carolina is still in play. As an added bonus there is 1 senate run off and 1 probable senate run off in Georgia. If the Democrats win 1 of them it is 48 Dem, 50 Rep, and 2 independents who vote blue. So Kamala would cast the deciding vote.

Wait for it........Friday bluses is being sung, later today it will be Friday night Blues. Trump is rumbling about running in 2020 as a Rep or 3rd party or independent, love it. It's gonna be 8 years if he does.

I wonder if Cruz or Graham will make a play for his base.

I hope they do piece great nominee for all of America. But as a guilty pleasure I would love to see Hilldog as ambassador to Russia.

This is gibberish. Drunk?

WTF is he talking about?

He's as demented as Biden. Roll with it.

Stream of consciousness release
As a portion of his psychotherapy.
I suggested it to his shrink.

No need to thank me...

Trump says there's been shenanigans.... 😟

Imagine if Biden were winning on election night, and Trump just kept counting until he had enough votes to win?

The media would lose their ever-loving minds. But since it's their boy... they're cool with it.

I don't get the extensions.... if you wanted a mail-in ballot you one early enough to get it there by Nov 3rd.... this is getting silly... 😟

When do you get to vote with guns.

Silicon valley terror alert, bomb their HQ's and up feed towers, harassment of personnel too.

😱... Republican party attifa 💥

Only 1 error in what I said. Dems will need 2 run offs in GA and have to take both. Unlikely. Enjoy your hand wringing, crying, and Trump lies. That is all you have right now. Drafter, you gonna get Guberment cheese!

Whoo Hoo..!! 🤣

Thay better not cut my chocolate rations tho damnit..!! 😠

lots of states have mail-in ballot rules that allow them to be counted as long as they are postmarked by election day. CA has had that on the books since as long as I can remember, and Whistle says I'm older than dirt...

Each state has the authority to decide their own laws regarding voting, but it would be better if they do allow mail-in votes to be counted if they are postmarked on election day, that they start counting them before election day. The volume of mail-in ballots was beyond what was expected, so it they legislated earlier counting, the back-up won't be as severe. Maybe hire more people to count the ballots.

The pandemic and Trump's rhetoric skewed the number of mail-in votes to the Dems...he kept attacking that method of voting, so many of his voters did so in person...Wisconsin's primaries in April were clusterF**s because of the pandemic...lack of poll workers due to virus fears reduced the number of polling places and workers...lines were extremely long on a rainy day...so mail-in votes became a favored way to vote...

hope it'll stay that way, since the turnout this election was astronomical...

Nancy gets ALL the chocolate now, there ain't going to be rations 😳

Yes Delta, but when they change rules hours before the election against the written laws it deserves questioning... 😟

It wasn't hours, but in some cases it was a few weeks...here's an NPR article about that process: seems it was the will of the citizens of those states...if not, they can vote their officials out...

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/23/916012284/rule-changes-in-swing-states-mean-more-votes-will-count-results-may-take-longer 



so far, among the dozens of election related lawsuits the POTUS has filed, the courts have not ruled much in Trump's favor

I wouldn't call it astronomical............I'd call it questionable,HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE

Supreme Court's Alito Tells Pennsylvania Counties to Separate Late Ballots
By Reuters, Wire Service Content Nov. 6, 2020, at 9:17 p.m.

A lawsuit filed on Election Day against the Pennsylvania state secretary alleges that a last-minute rule change to the state's ballot counting process is privileging some voters over others and potentially slanting the outcome of the election. 

The suit, filed by two Pennsylvania politicians and several of the state's voters, argues that Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar's guidance issued "just hours before the election" is in "clear contravention" of state law. 

Pennsylvania state law does not allow voters the opportunity “to cure perceived defects [on mail-in ballots] in a timely manner,” the state supreme court ruled last month. The state also forbids election workers from sharing any details on voters’ ballots from pre-canvass meetings.

Nevertheless, on Monday Boockvar directed officials with county boards of election to “provide information to party and candidate representatives during the pre-canvass that identifies the voters whose ballots have been rejected” so that the voters can be notified and the ballots can be cured, or re-written and submitted.

The complaint notes that multiple Pennsylvania counties have “refused to accept” Boockvar’s guidance “because it is in contravention of the Election Code.” As a result, the guidance “is allowing only certain voters to cure their defects," the suit continues. 

Phill Kline, the director of the Thomas More Society's Amistad Project and the attorney representing the complainants in the case, told Just the News on Tuesday night: "Election rules should be applied in a manner that treats every voter equally and every vote in a fair manner.  This is not being done in Pennsylvania.”

The lawsuit asks for an injunction against the order forbidding both the curing of ballots and the sharing of information from pre-canvassing meetings.

Film at 11... 😟

Alito can stick it up his azz. Individually he has no authority to tell anyone anything. He is a Republican political hack who is an embarrassment to SCOTUS.