8trackdisco
5 years ago
Im wondering if this might be an OJ Revenge result.

One bastardized verdict following the prior.

Advocating for Equality is a lonely business.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
5 years ago
Anyone else happen to watch this live?
NOT looking good for Chauvin.
HockeyDad
5 years ago
They haven’t convicted him yet? This is a show trial.
ZRX1200
5 years ago
Which part wasn’t good? The drugs can cause hypoxia part or the part where the prosecutions witness said it sounded like “I ate too many drugs”....
Abrignac
5 years ago
I haven’t t watched it, but I’ve caught bits and pieces on the news. As Robert says it sucks to be Chauvin right now. However, his defense has yet to be presented. I suspect a Frankie T jury.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
5 years ago
Think about the jurors who all have to sit there and listen and watch this all day long, day after day after day, I can't imagine what the mental recovery time for them will be,
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
5 years ago

Which part wasn’t good? The drugs can cause hypoxia part or the part where the prosecutions witness said it sounded like “I ate too many drugs”....

ZRX1200 wrote:


That's your own take-away from watching the trial yourself?
Speyside
5 years ago
My main concern is that he gets a fair trial which I think he has up to now.
Speyside
5 years ago
I would like to hear testimony from a pathologist expert also. I do not think a pulmonary expert is sufficient.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
5 years ago

I would like to hear testimony from a pathologist expert also. I do not think a pulmonary expert is sufficient.

Speyside wrote:


Are you watching today?
Speyside
5 years ago
No, was there a pathology expert?
ZRX1200
5 years ago
Robert I watch bits....I avoid most media most of the time.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
5 years ago

No, was there a pathology expert?

Speyside wrote:


Yes, There were two. One was the former head of the department who trained her subordinate, who was the other pathologist testifying. Both basically said it was the knee on the neck/back and not the drugs or pre-existing conditions, Of course they did have to to concede quite a bit on cross examination. The retired pathologist was there for free, not as a paid expert.
Speyside
5 years ago
Robert, thank you. I am having a difficult time coming to a conclusion of what I think he is guilty of. Have you formed an opinion?
frankj1
5 years ago
waiting to hear the defense witnesses
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
5 years ago

Robert, thank you. I am having a difficult time coming to a conclusion of what I think he is guilty of. Have you formed an opinion?

Speyside wrote:


I haven't looked at the statutes or jury instructions for the alleged crimes, but I will...

rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
5 years ago

waiting to hear the defense witnesses

frankj1 wrote:


This is going to be very interesting. I wonder whether Chauvin will testify?
ZRX1200
5 years ago
You think he should?
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
5 years ago
No opinion yet. He has the entire trial to decide weather to be testify. All the way until the very end...
Anything now would just be a wild guess. I really need to read the criminal statutes along with the standard jury instructions.
jespear
5 years ago

My gut says that will happen regardless of the outcome.

Stogie1020 wrote:



^
THIS !

Users browsing this topic