deadeyedick
5 years ago
When you were a kid they burned people at the stake for heat.
RayR
5 years ago

Cut carbon=dead trees... plus veggies, fruits,grass,weed,wine,etc. Faze two, meat, booze, clothes, etc...
Oxygen who the hell need that.

One good thing, no more forest fires, after the last BIG burn.

I guess they didn't learn about, plants converting CO2 into OXYGEN.
Only taught hate and racism.

Smooth light wrote:



I myself as a carbon based organism am pro-carbon. The carbon hate racist crowd are the the gas bag methane heads, proponents of the Green New Deal. They hate oxygen because methanogens require low oxygen environments to produce their gas and worse yet we burn their hydrocarbon for fuel releasing its carbon. They hate CO2 because the molecule is made up of carbon and oxygen and is a necessary part of the carbon cycle that sustains carbon based organisms including plants that require CO2 as crucial part of their metabolism that creates sugars and nutrients that in turn nourish carbon based animals.

You'll also find the same gas bag methane heads as propagandists for wearing face masks. So you see why the gas bag methane head Dr. Fauci doesn't follow the science released by his own bureaucracy. Starving the brain of O2 is part of the recipe for creating more gas bag methane heads that will vote for commies progressives. Sinister aren't they?

A recent Stanford study released by the NCBI, which is under the National Institutes of Health, showed that masks do absolutely nothing to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 and their use is even harmful.

"Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/stanford-study-results-facemasks-ineffective-block-transmission-covid-19-actually-can-cause-health-deterioration-premature-death/ 




Speyside
5 years ago
Absolute lies like you always post.

shttps://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/04/22/did-so-called-stanford-nih-study-really-show-face-masks-are-ineffective-against-covid-19/ 

It is not a Stanford of Nih study. In fact it isn't a study at all.
Smooth light
5 years ago
🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜
Someone been feeding them"crack"crackers again!! Chrip chrip.

DO NOT FEED THE PARROT'S !!!!

they got a mask over their mine's, maybe 5.

Hehe 😊
izonfire
5 years ago
^ You be Chrippin' early today Smoothie...
teedubbya
5 years ago
I could go for a smoothie about now
izonfire
5 years ago

I could go for a smoothie about now

teedubbya wrote:


The Boston steamer is waiting for you in another thread...
teedubbya
5 years ago
I've graduated from Cleveland to Boston! Atlanta here I come. It's gonna burn like sherman.
HockeyDad
5 years ago

Electric torches still require burning oil, coal, NG (most common sources of energy) to create electricity. He gains carbon credits by going solar.

He should be focusing on solar or wind powered torches.

BuckyB93 wrote:



Solar powered torches suck at night and that’s when Antifa and BLM come out to mostly peaceful protest.
HockeyDad
5 years ago

Sounds like the pitch fork and torch business is depressed. Have you thought about electric torches ?

tonygraz wrote:



Diversity is your friend. Pitchforks and torches for some people, carbon credits for others. (Maybe the same person buys both due to torch use guilt)

The best part about Le HockeyDad Carbon Credits (TM) is that thy come from forest repopulation in Togawandaland. Where is Togowandaland you ask? That is the beauty of it....it is where ever you want to believe it is!

I’ll put you down for a nice starter pack of carbon credits that are currently going for $25K. Just for you I’ll make you a special deal for the starter pack with just three easy payments of $10K each.

RayR
5 years ago

Absolute lies like you always post.

shttps://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/04/22/did-so-called-stanford-nih-study-really-show-face-masks-are-ineffective-against-covid-19/ 

It is not a Stanford of Nih study. In fact it isn't a study at all.

Speyside wrote:



Why doesn't Bruce Lee (writer, journalist, professor, systems modeler, computational and digital health expert, avocado-eater, and entrepreneur, not always in that order) offer evidence that masks stop the RONA?
Opps! That's right, there is no correlation in the data to support it. Herr Fauci is confused and doesn't get it.
https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/fauci-not-sure-why-texas-doesnt-have-covid-uptick-after-nixing-masks/ 

Why is this heresy published on the NCBI website when the MSM, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter censor it?

Carbon based life forms want to know.

From the linked article:
"What Stanford nor any of the various fact-checkers addressing this story do not do is acknowledge that states without face mask requirements are seeing reduced Covid cases while with the strictest face masks requirements are spiking. The conclusions drawn in this study are still relevant whether Stanford and others acknowledge the scientific data or not."

https://noqreport.com/2021/04/17/stanford-study-quietly-published-at-nih-gov-proves-face-masks-are-absolutely-worthless-against-covid 

Horror of horrors! Did you know there are states and towns and peoples who are not listening to Dicktator O'Biden and Herr Fauci? πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚
https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/a-nation-of-maskholes/ 








Speyside
5 years ago
Don't give 2 chits about that article. You lied. That is a fact. Prove me wrong and don't deflect. Find the Stanford study directly or find an NIH link. If you can do either of those I will gladly take back my words. Otherwise you are a lier.
Speyside
5 years ago
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730488/ 

This article by NCBI disproves what you said. Quote direct from the source please. Not an editorial that is lying. Though truth doesn't fit your POV in this instance.
Smooth light
5 years ago
Common sense says, you can never convince somebody that's been deceived, they can't believe their own lion eyes.

Did you believe the sky is up,or did it have to be in writing? How about are you alive?
Or just magnetic ink.
RayR
5 years ago

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730488/

This article by NCBI disproves what you said. Quote direct from the source please. Not an editorial that is lying. Though truth doesn't fit your POV in this instance.

Speyside wrote:



Ah, so you don't give give 2 chits about the other article but you like this one. Sounds like you are like the big tech censors who filter out and cancel all the scientific evidence, all the doctors and scientists that don't parrot the official reptilian COVID doomer cult with its superstitions and dogma. Intellectual curiosity must be thwarted at all costs, debate must be cancelled lest the proles learn they've been bamboozled and their emperors have no clothes.
I suppose they are all liars and science deniers just because they reject preaching wearing the muzzle of obedience, the arbitrary social distancing and the authoritarian lockdowns. They must want people to die!
Speyside
5 years ago
No, I like facts from the source. Not opinion pieces.
RayR
5 years ago

No, I like facts from the source. Not opinion pieces.

Speyside wrote:



Com'on man, where's the facts?
The data doesn't support the superstitious malarkey (so-called "facts from the source") of O'Biden and Flip Floppin Fauci.

Get the free e-book, πŸ…±COVID Charts CNN Forgot...and lots more real facts
https://tomwoods.com/covid/ 



Speyside
5 years ago
You us op Ed's, done.
Mr. Jones
5 years ago
My arse wipes carbon...

Joe STRANOSA has seen it...

RayR
5 years ago

You us op Ed's, done.

Speyside wrote:



Op-ed's? WTF!
It's the data man. Follow the data, it's the gubment's own data.
Don't you follow the scientific data? The science will set you free.

Or is cultish nonsense spewed by tax eating lizards like politicians and public health bureaucrats science to you?

Users browsing this topic