rfenst
4 years ago

Robert is being a judge or a legal scholar a requirement constitutionally (either textually or living breathing pretend world) ?

ZRX1200 wrote:



Somehow I think you already know the answer.
https://supreme.findlaw.com/supreme_court/justices/nopriorexp.html 
rfenst
4 years ago

What are you whining about? You act like there have only been WASPS.
There's been 8 Jews on the SCOTUS.
Including Breyer and Kagan and the late RBG.


Thurgood Marshall was the first black American Supreme Court Justice
And then there's Clarence Thomas whose there now, you know the guy that the racist Biden tried to beat up like Corn Pop during the confirmation hearings.

RayR wrote:


You are the person on CBID who most often brings Jews into a conversation unrelated to religion. What is your real point?
borndead1
4 years ago
He will replace Breyer with another Breyer.

But he will make sure the replacement is a black woman so he can point and say, "See? I'm not a racist!"

But then again...Reagan made a campaign promise in 1980 to 'appoint the first woman to the SCOTUS'.

SCOTUS appointments are ALWAYS political. ALWAYS. It's one of the few things that you can absolutely count on from both parties.
rfenst
4 years ago

He will replace Breyer with another Breyer.

But he will make sure the replacement is a black woman so he can point and say, "See? I'm not a racist!"

But then again...Reagan made a campaign promise in 1980 to 'appoint the first woman to the SCOTUS'.

SCOTUS appointments are ALWAYS political. ALWAYS. It's one of the few things that you can absolutely count on from both parties.

borndead1 wrote:


I think one of the three potential candidates being spoken about in the press (the one who sits on the 1st District?) clerked for Breyer. I just cannot believe he wouldn't somehow make his opinion about her known to Biden.
RayR
4 years ago

You are the person on CBID who most often brings Jews into a conversation unrelated to religion?

rfenst wrote:



You stop your whining too. I was just pointing out that not all Supreme Court Justices have been WASP crackers.
6 of the 9 Supreme Court Justices are Catholics, including Sotomayor, the first Hispanic U.S. Supreme Court Justice.
Who the frank cares anyway what race, ethnicity, or religion any of them are except people like Biden who feels the need to apply Affirmative Action when choosing a new nominee for judge? Like Com'on MAN, virtue-signaling rules, my choice has to be woke historic like that clean black guy I ran with back in the day.



rfenst
4 years ago

You stop your whining too. I was just pointing out that not all Supreme Court Justices have been WASP crackers.
6 of the 9 Supreme Court Justices are Catholics, including Sotomayor, the first Hispanic U.S. Supreme Court Justice.
Who the frank cares anyway what race, ethnicity, or religion any of them are except people like Biden who feels the need to apply Affirmative Action when choosing a new nominee for judge? Like Com'on MAN, virtue-signaling rules, my choice has to be woke historic like that clean black guy I ran with back in the day.

RayR wrote:



I care that there is some intentional diversification of the court whether by race, gender, religion, ethnicity, etc., etc. If that is virtue-signaling, then I will wear it proudly. And, I will feel real good/proud about our country putting a competent black woman on SCOTUS. Lot's of different perspectives is a good thing there.
rfenst
4 years ago

You stop your whining too. I was just pointing out that not all Supreme Court Justices have been WASP crackers.
6 of the 9 Supreme Court Justices are Catholics, including Sotomayor, the first Hispanic U.S. Supreme Court Justice.
Who the frank cares anyway what race, ethnicity, or religion any of them are except people like Biden who feels the need to apply Affirmative Action when choosing a new nominee for judge? Like Com'on MAN, virtue-signaling rules, my choice has to be woke historic like that clean black guy I ran with back in the day.

RayR wrote:


Now you want to bring the "whining" bull$hit into things?
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
4 years ago

WTF are you talking about above, Ben? I don't get it.

rfenst wrote:



Oh, was bantering with Ray on the current priorities of the left. Offtopic for sure.
Krazeehorse
4 years ago
Would it be a problem if Biden excluded a candidate because they were a black female? Is that racist or in any way illegal?
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
4 years ago
Guy with horse icon, yes, in my opinion it's racist. It was racist when he said his intentions before picking Kamala...

Braindead idiot is trying it again, thinking he won on that. He only won because he's not Trump.

Racism is racism.
Speyside2
4 years ago
Krazeehorse, if we are picking a member of SCOTUS based on race and sex, I think a better choice would be a native woman, say a Lakota Sioux for instance.
RayR
4 years ago

Oh, was bantering with Ray on the current priorities of the left. Offtopic for sure.

bgz wrote:



You were right about the priorities. Biden missed the boat appealing to the woke left, the racist basturd should have said his historic choice for SC judge would be a Trans Black Woman.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
4 years ago
Speyside2
4 years ago
Here is a thought. What if he somehow is able to nominate a black woman who is the best choice.
Krazeehorse
4 years ago

Here is a thought. What if he somehow is able to nominate a black woman who is the best choice.

Speyside2 wrote:


There will always be some who will say that the only reason that person was nominated was because they were a black woman. They may be the best but will have that asterisk beside their name.
HockeyDad
4 years ago

Here is a thought. What if he somehow is able to nominate a black woman who is the best choice.

Speyside2 wrote:




It doesn’t matter. It has already been stated that she will be nominated because she is black.
RayR
4 years ago

Here is a thought. What if he somehow is able to nominate a black woman who is the best choice.

Speyside2 wrote:



Best choice? That's a relative term, but if you mean someone who will judge by the originalist meaning of the words in the constitution...no way.
It's unthinkable that his handlers will allow such an error. He will choose a candidate that dislikes the U.S. Constitution even more than the late RBG. He will pick a nominee that will vote to reliably rubber stamp his authoritarian diktats.
DrMaddVibe
4 years ago

Here is a thought. What if he somehow is able to nominate a black woman who is the best choice.

Speyside2 wrote:




Then all of her accomplishments won't matter. She was selected on what Biden promised Clyburn for his support.

:-k

That's an awful lot like a quid pro quo for the Black vote.
Speyside2
4 years ago
What Biden promised Clyburn would be irrelevant, if she was the best choice. Are you saying you would not support her addition to SCOTUS if she was the best choice? Mind you I am not saying who is the best choice, just what if.
DrMaddVibe
4 years ago

What Biden promised Clyburn would be irrelevant, if she was the best choice. Are you saying you would not support her addition to SCOTUS if she was the best choice? Mind you I am not saying who is the best choice, just what if.

Speyside2 wrote:




Look...

"The retirement of Justice Stephen G. Breyer will give President Biden a chance to make history, and to make good on his promise to put a Black woman on the Supreme Court, a campaign year pledge that helped revive his flagging campaign.

Mr. Biden made the promise at a debate in February 2020, just days before facing his Democratic rivals in the South Carolina primary, where Black people make up a large portion of the party’s voters. At the time, his campaign was struggling amid losses in two of the early presidential contests.

“I’m looking forward to making sure there’s a Black woman on the Supreme Court to make sure we in fact get everyone represented,” Mr. Biden said that night."

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/26/us/politics/biden-supreme-court-black-woman.html 


If Biden is picking anything...IT'S THE WRONG CHOICE!
Users browsing this topic