He won't pick a conservative textualist and we all know that. As long as I believe whoever he picks has the requisite skills, I don't care who it is because it just won't mater for like 20 years. The fact that it bothers you that it will be a qualified black woman says a lot about you.

rfenst wrote:

I'd bet your happy that the suggested candidates aren't Muslim, Buddhist, Mormon or the like.

rfenst wrote:

Biden is obviously a racist and a sexist if he is going to make his choice based on skin color and gender. That's clearly a case of discrimination against White and Asian men and woman candidates. If yer OK with that, that says a lot about you.

Of course, he won't pick a textualist or God forbid, an originalist. Progressive don't care what those words mean in the Constitution unless they can twist them around and pervert their meaning to support their agenda. I'm sure that's the only required skill that the lizard people consider important.

RayR wrote:

He made a campaign promise. He won the election. He is following the will of the people. I assume he will pick a liberal judge who makes RBG look conservative. It really is a moot point as SCOTUS will be conservative for the foreseeable future.

Speyside2 wrote:

Biden is obviously a racist and a sexist if he is going to make his choice based on skin color and gender. That's clearly a case of discrimination against White and Asian men and woman candidates. If yer OK with that, that says a lot about you.

RayR wrote:

Agreed.

America has forgotten “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” –Martin Luther King, Jr.

Picking a SCOTUS based on sex and color??? This is racism through and through. Then again we're referring to the DNC and what they stand for. So much for a qualified bench.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

She's never even been a judge or law scholar.

rfenst wrote:

in all honesty, hasn't that always been how it's been done from day one?
Until like 25 or so years ago?

frankj1 wrote:

I don't give 2 sh*ts what their sex or their color is.

Were we choosing the best qualified people? If that meant fkn white guys, so be it. Now we're choosing people not on their qualifications, but their skin color or sex?

Stooooopid.

MACS wrote:

over two centuries of only white men.
No one else is qualified.
No one of the opposite sex.
No one of any other race.
No other fine Americans except white men.

Is that not a bit more racist than what causes you outrage?

You might want to take a step back in awe...

frankj1 wrote:

I don't give 2 sh*ts what their sex or their color is.

Were we choosing the best qualified people? If that meant fkn white guys, so be it. Now we're choosing people not on their qualifications, but their skin color or sex?

Stooooopid.

MACS wrote: