HockeyDad
4 years ago

and why did they wait until now?

frankj1 wrote:



They’re Canadians. It takes two years to get a Canadian angry.
RayR
4 years ago

They’re Canadians. It takes two years to get a Canadian angry.

HockeyDad wrote:




True...True, they're not the most easily excitable people. 🤔
RayR
4 years ago

I'll smoke another joint while I contemplate what it means to blockade our nations capitol with a bunch of armed truckers.

I think you should smoke a joint... you're always telling me to do it... take your own advice.

It clearly impares you to the point of incognition... especially seeing how I was responding to Ray talking about the armed truckers going to DC and you're talking as if I'm talking about what the Canadians are doing. I don't gaf about them.

Why do you always misinterpret what I say then claim I said something else... you do it all the time... it's weird... can I have some of what you're smokin'?

bgz wrote:



So the dicktators are readying the National Guard and reinstalling the fencing around the U.S. Capitol in preparedness for the trucker insurrectionist invasion.
If it was BLM and ANTIFA coming to town for one of their "peaceful protests", the regime would be painting the streets with catchy slogans and welcome signs, and calling off the police presence.
I don't see much difference between the U.S. progturd regime and the Canadian progturd regime.

bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
4 years ago

So the dicktators are readying the National Guard and reinstalling the fencing around the U.S. Capitol in preparedness for the trucker insurrectionist invasion.
If it was BLM and ANTIFA coming to town for one of their "peaceful protests", the regime would be painting the streets with catchy slogans and welcome signs, and calling off the police presence.
I don't see much difference between the U.S. progturd regime and the Canadian progturd regime.

RayR wrote:



I would think any group of armed personnel with huge blockading vehicles surrounding the capitol would be akin to an act of war regardless of affiliation.
Stogie1020
4 years ago

I would think any group of armed personnel with huge blockading vehicles surrounding the capitol would be akin to an act of war regardless of affiliation.

bgz wrote:


Why would you assume that they are armed?
ZRX1200
4 years ago
Well the felon and the pedophile Rittenhouse removed oil plugs from were armed…..
Speyside2
4 years ago
Z, chill, Rittenhouse was proven innocent, correct decision. Though after better understanding the charges and burden of proof I question if he should have been charged at all.
ZRX1200
4 years ago
I was playing devils advocate for bgz, he’s my buddy.
Speyside2
4 years ago
Sunoverbeach
4 years ago
I was a loner as a child. I had an imaginary friend. I didn't bother with him
- GC
frankj1
4 years ago
we assume innocence, we must prove guilt
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
4 years ago

I was playing devils advocate for bgz, he’s my buddy.

ZRX1200 wrote:



Thanks for lookin out!
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
4 years ago

Why would you assume that they are armed?

Stogie1020 wrote:



Oh forgot to respond to you...

Have you ever met an unarmed trucker?
frankj1
4 years ago
only dead ones
Users browsing this topic