tailgater
4 years ago
Ok. She checks all the boxes:
She's black.
She's a she.

Fine. But this circus they do in Congress has been a bit revealing.

Is it just coincidence that Biden nominated a judge that's shown to be lenient towards pedophiles? (OK, just child porn. But it shows a trend). We're talking safety net?

And how fitting that she can't (won't) provide a definition of "woman".
Seriously. Said she's "not a biologist"!!!
Because you have to have a degree in biology to define a word we learned in 1st grade.

And it's ironic.
Because 50% of her qualification is based on her being a woman.


The democrats are an embarrassment to the USA.

Whistlebritches
4 years ago

Ok. She checks all the boxes:
She's black.
She's a she.

Fine. But this circus they do in Congress has been a bit revealing.

Is it just coincidence that Biden nominated a judge that's shown to be lenient towards pedophiles? (OK, just child porn. But it shows a trend). We're talking safety net?

And how fitting that she can't (won't) provide a definition of "woman".
Seriously. Said she's "not a biologist"!!!
Because you have to have a degree in biology to define a word we learned in 1st grade.

And it's ironic.
Because 50% of her qualification is based on her being a woman.


The democrats are an embarrassment to the USA.

tailgater wrote:




I'll second that
RayR
4 years ago
I'll third it.

I said she would be awful just because of the fact that Biden nominated her.

And since she can't (won't) provide a definition of "woman" with the lame excuse that she's not a biologist proves it.

frankj1
4 years ago
what do you think the real question was though?
Clearly, on it's own, it wasn't meant to help determine her qualifications for the job.

She couldn't do what I would do when asked something so obviously leading. That would be to find out what the questioner really was getting at, so I would always answer with, "why do you ask?".

So, why did he ask?

We all know why.
Whistlebritches
4 years ago

what do you think the real question was though?
Clearly, on it's own, it wasn't meant to help determine her qualifications for the job.

She couldn't do what I would do when asked something so obviously leading. That would be to find out what the questioner really was getting at, so I would always answer with, "why do you ask?".

So, why did he ask?

We all know why.

frankj1 wrote:



I don't know Frank with all this gender BS going on I think its a legitimate question.In my opinion and mine only you should leave this world with the same equipment you arrived with.


Pretty simple answer really............ two X chromosomes = woman, an X and a Y chromosome = man
Sunoverbeach
4 years ago
I’m trying to get away from trashing women, to be honest. I think I’ve done enough of that in my career.
- BB
frankj1
4 years ago

I don't know Frank with all this gender BS going on I think its a legitimate question.In my opinion and mine only you should leave this world with the same equipment you arrived with.


Pretty simple answer really............ two X chromosomes = woman, an X and a Y chromosome = man

Whistlebritches wrote:


I'm so happy I don't have to be a person for whom it's not so clear.
Never understood why they get so hated.
Mike3316
4 years ago
Hey - even the 5 yr old in Kindergarden Cop knew the answer ...... "boys have a pe n is - girls have a vagina." Seems like the basic biology we learned in 5th grade health class.

As for her child porn answer - it was the most rediculous legal reasoning I've ever heard (and I've been an attorney for 20 yrs). She actually said that since the federal sentencing guidlines for possession of child porn were created before the internet and becuase it is now EASIER to possess large quantities of child porn - the sentence should be LOWER?!?!?! So I guess by the same rationale - since its easier to commit embezzlement today because of the internet then it was when the Ponzi laws were written - then Bernie Madoff shouldn't have gotten 150 yrs in prison. I pray to G-d that there are at least 2 Democrats that are facing enough of a challenge in November (and that the Republicans can get their sheeet together) to keep this moron off the SCOTUS!
RayR
4 years ago
Let me take a wild guess...she's one of those "living constitution" advocates, where you legislate from the beach with legal weasel talk and make chit up as to what is legal and constitutional at the moment.
Dg west deptford
4 years ago
If the constitution is living don't we need a biologist to read it?

What would she have said if she did have a background in biology ?

A woman has 2 x chromosomes? That would be majorly hurtful to Lia Thomas. Where are they going with that argument?

Poor cross dressers getting picked on by biology truthers.

They should cancel biology. It's just mean spirited.
frankj1
4 years ago
all those who now believe in science say "Hey!"
HockeyDad
4 years ago

all those who now believe in science say "Hey!"

frankj1 wrote:



So we gotta check with Fauci?
Sunoverbeach
4 years ago
I bet ‘The Walking Dead’ gets really low ratings out in Montana, just because all they need to do is look out their f*ck*ng window, am I right?
- BB
frankj1
4 years ago

So we gotta check with Fauci?

HockeyDad wrote:


I was thinking Bill Nye.

it struck me that seeing references to science for some subjects is similar to no atheists in a fox hole.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
4 years ago
So you guys don't like black chicks then?

Also, I would say it's unlikely to find an atheist in a fox hole... I'm sure given enough fox holes, one would surely exist.
Krazeehorse
4 years ago
They have licorice Peeps? Not just pink and yellow?
RayR
4 years ago

So you guys don't like black chicks then?

Also, I would say it's unlikely to find an atheist in a fox hole... I'm sure given enough fox holes, one would surely exist.

bgz wrote:



We already know Biden is a racist and a virtue-signaling dirtbag that will do anything to appeal to his evil left base.
If that means picking black chicks, gheys or trans folk for the only reason they are black chicks, gheys or trans folk and nothing else, he'll do it.
In his bizarro version of affirmative action, his excuse is that he needs his administration and courts to "look like America".

tailgater
4 years ago

what do you think the real question was though?
Clearly, on it's own, it wasn't meant to help determine her qualifications for the job.

She couldn't do what I would do when asked something so obviously leading. That would be to find out what the questioner really was getting at, so I would always answer with, "why do you ask?".

So, why did he ask?

We all know why.

frankj1 wrote:




To answer your question "why did he ask?"
Because she refused to answer the relevant questions that led up to that point.

Listen to the exchange.

She's unqualified, and it's now obvious how she got the nomination.






bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
4 years ago

We already know Biden is a racist and a virtue-signaling dirtbag that will do anything to appeal to his evil left base.
If that means picking black chicks, gheys or trans folk for the only reason they are black chicks, gheys or trans folk and nothing else, he'll do it.
In his bizarro version of affirmative action, his excuse is that he needs his administration and courts to "look like America".

RayR wrote:



You have an aspd.
RayR
4 years ago

You have an aspd.

bgz wrote:



You have to stop saying nice things, people are going to start thinking you're sweet on me.
Users browsing this topic