Dg west deptford
4 years ago

They have licorice Peeps? Not just pink and yellow?

Krazeehorse wrote:



That's gold
rfenst
4 years ago
I liked that she refused to answer the question.
And, anyone who thinks female = woman is an idiot.
rfenst
4 years ago

You have an aspd.

bgz wrote:


Great Dx!

"Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is a mental health condition. People with ASPD may not understand how to behave toward others. Their behavior is often disrespectful, manipulative or reckless. Management of ASPD can include medication or psychotherapy."

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/9657-antisocial-personality-disorder#:~:text=Antisocial%20personality%20disorder%20 (ASPD)%20is,can%20include%20medication%20or%20psychotherapy.
tailgater
4 years ago

I liked that she refused to answer the question.
And, anyone who thinks female = woman is an idiot.

rfenst wrote:



Are you a biologist? 🇨🇮



But let me be the first to say it.
A woman is a female adult.

Exceptions, biological or otherwise, don't change this.


I don't want this to mean more than what I'm saying.
I wouldn't force anyone to live as somebody they feel they aren't.


If I said "Mankind has opposable thumbs", many would recognize this as a contributing factor to our place on the food chain. Knowing that some are born without this feature doesn't change the facts.

We need men and women to survive. You know this.
Fighting because I used the wrong pronoun is counterproductive. Forcing teenage girls to compete against teenage (born) males is not how we improve acceptance.
And not answering questions that are relevant in America 2022 is not how the system is supposed to work.


She's an intelligent woman. She provided outstanding answers to many of the questions. But it felt like she was hesitant on certain subjects. Not because she couldn't answer, but perhaps because she shouldn't.
Fitting the narrative has trumped the facts.
The Supreme Court is supposed to be above the narrative. But she is apparently not.






Mike3316
4 years ago

Let me take a wild guess...she's one of those "living constitution" advocates, where you legislate from the beach with legal weasel talk and make chit up as to what is legal and constitutional at the moment.

RayR wrote:


You got it. As I said - for me, her rationalization for her offensively low sentencing of child porn cases would be enough for me to vote against her if I were a senator.
JGKAMIN
4 years ago

You got it. As I said - for me, her rationalization for her offensively low sentencing of child porn cases would be enough for me to vote against her if I were a senator.

Mike3316 wrote:


+1
Krazeehorse
4 years ago
Sounds like she admitted that gender was biological and not a persuasion.
Dg west deptford
4 years ago
^right?!
That's what I was saying.

Where's that defense lead? A biologists answer wouldn't be much more than a human with XX chromosomes.

How does that biological definition help her evade ?

Cervix haver?

Chest feeder?

Ovary bearer?

Now if she said what's a gurl? That's a different biological answer.

"I'm no vet but I know what a dog is & this one's a bitch
RayR
4 years ago
I think this is everything anyone needs to know about this affair.

She Can’t Define “Woman” - Biden’s Supreme Court Pick

Krazeehorse
4 years ago
And none of this will matter (as far as her confirmation is concerned). None on the left will break ranks. Mark it down.
Sunoverbeach
4 years ago
If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.
- Mark Twain
Mike3316
4 years ago

And none of this will matter (as far as her confirmation is concerned). None on the left will break ranks. Mark it down.

Krazeehorse wrote:


You're probably right - but I'm praying there are at least 2 vulnerable Dems this November that might not be able to afford to vote for her.
JGKAMIN
4 years ago
Forget the candidate, the scumbags out there wishing ill will on a current sitting SC Justice is disgusting.
RayR
4 years ago

Forget the candidate, the scumbags out there wishing ill will on a current sitting SC Justice is disgusting.

JGKAMIN wrote:



Of course, he's an impediment to destroying what's left of the constitution
Wishing illness and death on their opponents is traditionally a leftist thing.
Sunoverbeach
4 years ago
Don’t go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first.
- Mark Twain
Stogie1020
4 years ago
I am wondering how the left reconciles the stated plan to nominate a "Woman" to the SCOTUS, but then the abject refusal to define what a woman is as a result of the vetting hearings. I mean, Ron Jeremy could have shown up for the confirmation hearings as long as he said he identified as a woman, right?
RayR
4 years ago

I am wondering how the left reconciles the stated plan to nominate a "Woman" to the SCOTUS, but then the abject refusal to define what a woman is as a result of the vetting hearings. I mean, Ron Jeremy could have shown up for the confirmation hearings as long as he said he identified as a woman, right?

Stogie1020 wrote:



The left doesn't need to reconcile anything they say. There is no truth they say, so anyone can be anything they want at any particular time according to the gospel of Woke.


"In religion and politics people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the questions at issue but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing."
- Autobiographical dictation, 10 July 1908. Published in Autobiography of Mark Twain, Volume 3
Sunoverbeach
4 years ago
Name the greatest of all inventors. Accident.
- MT
Users browsing this topic