Tony the reason why is that there's less filler.

jjanecka wrote:

And less circumference making for less wrapper.

tonygraz wrote:

filler to wrapper ratio.

Phil222 wrote:

They break it down pretty well in this article.

http://cigardojo.com/2017/11/cigar-science-wrapper-filler-ratios/ 

Phil222 wrote:

Read it twice. Too much math for me. Nonetheless, I still prefer smaller RG smokes.

Palama wrote:

Try Foundation Cigars Tabernacle lancero

cashmoneydave wrote:

Pantela is shorter than a lancero, lonsdale is thiccc-er than a lancero and generally a touch shorter.

The skinny monsters are a great one to enjoy also.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Yeah la Duena lancero is really more of a lonsdale. I really like that smoke. Might like lonsdale over lanceros. Might depend on my mood. I’ll Agee it’s a nice cigar size

Jakethesnake86 wrote:

I like the industry running roughshod over any type of consistent naming. Could be a panatela, or maybe it's a petit lancero. Might be a lonsdale, or there's a chance it's a cazadore. An AB Texas Lancero by any other name is a really long frigging gordo... is gordo extra a thing?

OK, I'll give 'em that last one for the everything's bigger in TX reference, but still, there's a wee bit o' madness going on

Sunoverbeach wrote: