It is important to test them twice a day, for a month.
Then you have 60 readings.
Then add up all the temps and RH values, and divide by 60, and you have a solid average.

After that, you only have to repeat the test every 3 months….

KingoftheCove wrote:

agree with Sire, do the 2x/day for 30 days.
But I'm in the camp that believes the median RH is more important than the average for any individual month.

After a year of median results, add those up and divide by 12 to get the average median for the year.

Then start again.

frankj1 wrote:

RAM just bein funny-----😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
Opie was fooled too…

https://www.cigarbid.com/Forum/c/posts/663475/Nub-Nuance-Fall-Harvest 

KingoftheCove wrote:

:-k
Given the relatively small “low to high spread” of the expected RH and temp readings, I think the mean would be both more valid, and more reliable, than the median.
Now if the spread was say, 20, from low to high?
Maybe the median wins out………………but even then………..I’d have to see the numbahs.
Then again, I’m not so good wif numbahs, or wurds….

KingoftheCove wrote:

most important mode is the "com"...for numbers 1 and 2

delta1 wrote:

Mraia, if you really want to know how your cigars are doing...

https://www.amazon.com/HumidiMeterTM-Cigar-Humidity-Tester-Accessory/dp/B082GJRKV6 

Stogie1020 wrote: