The standard for a business coming under another state's laws is the degree of contact ("minimum contacts") such as regularly doing business in and/or availing itself of the other state's benefits, such as by merely advertising, having a store in the other state and/or mailing brochures the other state, etc., is sufficient.

I would be happy to continue this dialectic in the presence of punctuation.

You need an elipses to feel good?... I mean, I gave you the damn Oxford comma, man!

😁

Do we have a seconded?

Aye!

I realize now it was written in legalese. I haven't seen that many commas in one sentence since peer proofing in an expository writing class. And I was reading it with a burrito at my draft table. I know my glasses work better than a burrito. And while you're argument is well crafted, I disagree. With all these patriots in here let's take a second to recognize the original unification of states. No taxation without representation. How is a business supposed to be represented at the material level of a state in which they have no voting interests. When I send trucks from my yard to the next town or state over for delivery, that merchandise or product is reported and paid by the business it was delivered to. If the customer is without tax ID they are taxed at the front counter rate.

I smell waffles.