If you dont think money is the #1 goal of ANY company, then you are quite a nimrod. It just so happens that in the news industry, credibility and money go hand in hand.

No credibility=NO MONEY

No Credibility = No Money

GWB repeatedly has claimed to have watched the first airplane striking the World Trade Center on TV just before entering a classroom at a Florida elementary school and he further claims to have though "there's one terrible pilot." and "It must have been a horrible accident, but I was whisked off there, I didn't have much time to think about it. And I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my Chief of Staff, who is sitting over here, walked in and said, `A second plane has hit the tower, America is under attack”"

However this is impossible since there was no live coverage of the first plane crash and no video emerged until the following day.

Bush has repeatedly lied to us about this.

No Credibility = No Money

Your tax dollars pay his salary.

I like how you change the subject when you know you've been had. Just like a true lib.

I'm outa here. I've got some ass to kick, LOL!

pwned

Adroomi,

re: post 22.

You used several quoted comments from President Bush, but none that quote him as saying he "saw" the first plane hit.

Could he have been talking about HEARING the news?

I've seen this set of "facts" before (maybe from you? I forget). And the other times I've seen it, it was phrased in a similar fashion: with quotes around his actual statements, prefaced by the comment that he claimed to "see" the crash prior to his school visit.

I'm not saying you're lying, but you're not one to leave important criteria out of your statements. I would be interested to see the entire quote, or at least a link to confirm it.

I think this was a case of half truths passed off as fact.

Maybe Rick told you...

Why should Tey comment about this? Are you more concerned with the situation involving illegal aliens in America, or prooving something to Tey?

Mattie, what is your stance on all of this? What is your view of the article above? Do you have a solution?

From your side, and from Tey's side, why must this always be broken down into an arguement? The article, in my opinion, clearly points the finger at congress, big business, and the folks that are making money. People in America want cheap lettuce, therefore there are illegals. Don't blame the illegals for doing the jobs that are given to them.

Adroomi-

I asked for tey's comments, not yours. I wanted to hear tey's opinion because I know he has strong views on this topic. I never asked anything of you. I thought perhaps he could enlighten the boards.

That was the agenda until you decided to run to the rescue...."Ohhhh,someone is calling out my Lil Bro". I still have not figured out why he needs or wants you to shelter him constantly, or why you feel the need to. Is it because you both are Liberals?

Remember, I wanted to have a discussion. You are the one that spoke of an aguement. What's up with you. Get the burr out of your azz.

Sorry Mattie,

I read your comment asking Tey for a comment and I misconstrued it to be facetious and full of sh*t, and simply on the verge of being a smart a*ssed comment, not a request for dialogue.

My mistake.

this **** is great!!!!

i'm cancelling cable.

besides, cable won't let me join in on the plot whenever i want.

How about this, if we're not sure what someone means, ask for clarification, don't go starting a flame war over what you thought someone meant. I know I've been guilty of this too, but it tends to bring a good discussion down to the level of schoolyard name calling, and in some recent cases bringing mothers into it, and we can all do without that.

foster,

where's the fun in that?

This doesn't smell right. It seems to be another anti-big business slam.

The claim is made that big-business (code for Republicans) favor this because it will ensure a continueing stream of cheap labor. If the illegals are given amnesty then they will become legal, right? So how is "Wall Street" going to exploit their illegality if they are made legal?

What the hell...let's just blame big business, anyway. They're just some nameless, faceless entity that has no united voice to defend itself. Or better yet, let's blame the Jews! C'mon, it's worked before! Yeah, that's the angle. Jews control big business, broadcasting, banking and what is left of manufacturing. One ethnic group pitted in a death struggle with another ethnic group. We could have steel cage matches featuring "The Gastroenterologist" vs. "The Tomato Picker From Hell." Think of it, the possibilities are endless.

But wait..... who would broadcast it and write about it and publish the programs and newspapers and promote the fight and sell tickets thus reap the profits? ****! The damned Jews, that's who!

TrannyMk

"The competition would love to smear FOX's reputation"

it is not necessary, most intelligent people wrap fish in the fox news.

"Especially since FOX's ratings are better than the rest of the other cable new channels COMBINED, YES COMBINED!"

and cage fighting is the hottest new tv show, beating out idol and all the other "reality" shows.

tailgater

side by side videos of bush saying two different things about one subject has been shown on many tv shows that you don't watch.

if you watched them you would say it is will farrel talking.