years ago toby and i visited hearst castle. very nice place, but i noticed the place had none of the
conveniences that we all have now.
it was a very pretty place with things that hearst bought all over europe that had been crafted 1n the middle ages.. nice big pool and an indoor pool with little tiles that was absolutely beautiful.
back when it was being built, even the poor could own a house, not as fancy, but with the same small rooms that hearst had and indoor plumbing.
the difference between the rich and the poor were generally working conditions. there was child labor, barely liveable working conditions, and the poor were generally used as paid slaves to make the rich richer. nothing wrong with entrepreneurship, but if it is on the backs of others misfortunes, it's not really moral.
the southern farmers, before the civil war, were entrepreneurs, on the backs of slaves and we all decided that was not a good thing.
the french and the russians both revolted because they lived under a class of people that took advantage of them. their lives were no more then bare essentials if at all, and absolutely no possibility of improving themselves. there was no way up. the wealthy had the land and the army.
at some point a revolution starts because enough people have gotten together and realized they are all in the same position.
unions started in this country for the same reasons. workers got together and decided they should fight together, strength in numbers. the unions however did not start a revolution as the french and russians did, they started to promote collective bargaining.
the result was the same here as it was in both france and russia, the ruling class, sent the army in to kill the people that were trying to have a better life.
there should have been a difference in this country because we are a democracy. the government should not have sent in troops to kill americans because they wanted to improve their lot in life.
the unions prevailed after many leaders were killed and the need for revolution in this country was avoided. if the unions had not prevailed,life for most americans would have gotten worse and the possibility of an attempt at anarchy would have been a reality.
up until recently, not unlike the hearst house and the poor peoples houses, the kind of roof you had over your head was very similar. the poor had windows, the rich had windows, the poor could flush a toilet, the rich could flush a toilet. bigger windows and fancier toilets, so what, "i can look out of my house and i can **** on a flush toilet."
now the rich have tv and the poor have tv. they have bigger screens, so what, "i can watch the same programs." they have more expensive cars, so what, "i drive a *****, in desert dawn beige with matching upholstery and it is a cool machine. i leased it because the payment were lower,but there she is in my driveway." the people have been bought off, saving the upper class the possibility of mutiny in the ranks.
"the difference between the rich and the poor were generally working conditions," and the cycle is
starting again with a different twist.
there are no jobs. people can't work. people can't take their kids to the doctor because they have
no medical coverage.
the rich live longer and healthier because they can afford the extra medical attention. a complete work up including lab work and the most advanced medical diognostic equipment can be done in one day if you have the $7,000.00 to $10,000.00.laying around. we all know the sooner you can spot a medical problem, the better chance you have of curing it. the rich die of the same things the poor do, but they get a few more years out of life.
where is the usa headed? soon the middle class will disappear and we will have a country owned and controlled by a small percent of the population and a large percent of the population poor, unemployed, and desperate..
vous parlez français