DadZilla3
13 years ago

Being a Liberal is awesome. I especially like the part where I can now be smug and act superior to everyone else on this board.

dpnewell wrote:



Arguing online liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, crap all over the board, and strut around like it's victorious. - Anonymous
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

Thank you Brewha. Being a Liberal is awesome. I especially like the part where I can now be smug and act superior to everyone else on this board.

dpnewell wrote:




Now post a pic of yourself with the same moustache as the Biker guy from the Village People and tell everyone how great looking you are...and that you love women!

[frypan] [frypan] [frypan]
victor809
13 years ago
Arguing online conservatives is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are at chess, the pigeon is just going to make up annoying platitudes which mean nothing but sound good to someone who doesn't really understand what they read.
- Abraham Lincoln
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago
"I want my free Obama stuff so I can wash it down with my Pinot" - Sandra Fluke
Brewha
13 years ago

Thank you Brewha. Being a Liberal is awesome. I especially like the part where I can now be smug and act superior to everyone else on this board.

dpnewell wrote:



And you won’t need to be stern, judgmental, or narrow minded. Soon you’ll be able to embrace people without caring about their race or religion. You might even start having ideas of your own . . . .

But one step at a time – do you own a pair of Birkenstocks?
DrafterX
13 years ago
does Obama give those away too..?? 😕
HockeyDad
13 years ago

You might even start having ideas of your own . . . .

Brewha wrote:



...Which will be provided to you through talking point emails.
DadZilla3
13 years ago

Arguing online conservatives is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are at chess, the pigeon is just going to make up annoying platitudes which mean nothing but sound good to someone who doesn't really understand what they read.
- Abraham Lincoln

victor809 wrote:



I rest my case.
hank56
13 years ago

And you won’t need to be stern, judgmental, or narrow minded. Soon you’ll be able to embrace people without caring about their race or religion. You might even start having ideas of your own . . . .

But one step at a time – do you own a pair of Birkenstocks?

Brewha wrote:




You may want to reread this Brewha, it would appear you are being judgmental and narrow minded as well.


Just an observation.


And please don't say you were just being sarcastic, that'd be weak.
dpnewell
13 years ago

And you won’t need to be stern, judgmental, or narrow minded. Soon you’ll be able to embrace people without caring about their race or religion. You might even start having ideas of your own . . . .

Brewha wrote:



Wait a minute, I’m confused. If I understand this Liberal thing correctly, aren’t I suppose to dismiss outright the neanderthal values of conservatives, and berate and belittle as intellectual inferiors, those who hold such values? If so, aren’t I still being “stern, judgmental, or narrow minded”? Or are conservatives so inferior to me now, that I may dismiss their values and opinions, as I would any other knuckle dragging ape? Opps, if I just insulted our ape brothers, please forgive me, as I’m only beginning to learn the doctrines of my new Liberal faith.

Then again, maybe I’m over thinking this whole thing. From what I’ve read from my new Liberal brothers and sisters (is that being sexist, should I have said sisters and brothers?), as long as I accept and believe what they believe, I’m considered open minded and non-judgmental, while at the same time I can totally reject and ridicule those outright evil conservatives. Wait a minute. How can that be? Now my brain is starting to hurt.

Let me see if I’ve got this part straight. As long as I and embrace the homo-sexual agenda, fight for special privileges for women and minorities, accept all non-Christian religions, I can outright hate white homo-phoebe males and all Christians, while still being considered “loving and accepting”, right? My mind says that it doesn’t make sense, but my new Liberal soul says it’s true.

All this “thinking” is so overrated, and probably a undesirable trait, left over from my former conservative life. It’s a good thing that I’m now a Liberal, and can support political causes because they “feel” right, and my fellow Liberal friends tell me that they’re right, instead of actually scrutinizing both sides of the issues.

I’m tired of searching out facts about issues. So much easier to believe what I’m told to believe. I think I’m going to like being a Liberal.
DadZilla3
13 years ago

Wait a minute, I’m confused. If I understand this Liberal thing correctly, aren’t I suppose to dismiss outright the neanderthal values of conservatives, and berate and belittle as intellectual inferiors, those who hold such values? If so, aren’t I still being “stern, judgmental, or narrow minded”? Or are conservatives so inferior to me now, that I may dismiss their values and opinions, as I would any other knuckle dragging ape? Opps, if I just insulted our ape brothers, please forgive me, as I’m only beginning to learn the doctrines of my new Liberal faith.

Then again, maybe I’m over thinking this whole thing. From what I’ve read from my new Liberal brothers and sisters (is that being sexist, should I have said sisters and brothers?), as long as I accept and believe what they believe, I’m considered open minded and non-judgmental, while at the same time I can totally reject and ridicule those outright evil conservatives. Wait a minute. How can that be? Now my brain is starting to hurt.

Let me see if I’ve got this part straight. As long as I and embrace the homo-sexual agenda, fight for special privileges for women and minorities, accept all non-Christian religions, I can outright hate white homo-phoebe males and all Christians, while still being considered “loving and accepting”, right? My mind says that it doesn’t make sense, but my new Liberal soul says it’s true.

All this “thinking” is so overrated, and probably a undesirable trait, left over from my former conservative life. It’s a good thing that I’m now a Liberal, and can support political causes because they “feel” right, and my fellow Liberal friends tell me that they’re right, instead of actually scrutinizing both sides of the issues.

I’m tired of searching out facts about issues. So much easier to believe what I’m told to believe. I think I’m going to like being a Liberal.

dpnewell wrote:



Have no fear my friend. Now that you are cautiously taking the first few tentative steps on the long journey to understanding fully the truism 'Liberalism is a mental disorder', some confusion is completely understandable.

I recommend adopting the popular (and soon to be mandatory) chant 'Ommmm-Ba-Ma Ommmm-Ba-Ma Ommmm-Ba-Ma, it will help you to become one with...well, the One.
pdxstogieman
13 years ago

"I want my free Obama stuff so I can wash it down with my Pinot" - Sandra Fluke

DrMaddVibe wrote:



"I want my $700 billion per annum entitlement for my military industrial complex revenue stream" -Cheney B. Halliburton
borndead1
13 years ago

"I want my $700 billion per annum entitlement for my military industrial complex revenue stream" -Cheney B. Halliburton

pdxstogieman wrote:




Are you implying that Dems vote 'no' on military spending? War?
Brewha
13 years ago

You may want to reread this Brewha, it would appear you are being judgmental and narrow minded as well.


Just an observation.


And please don't say you were just being sarcastic, that'd be weak.

hank56 wrote:



Condescending. I was going for condescending. Which would encompass judgmental and to some extent narrow mindedness I suppose.

It as in no way meant as sarcasum. We all know that any liberal worth his salt has a well crafted pair of sandals . . . . .
dpnewell
13 years ago
I don’t own any sandals. Does that disqualify me? If so, where can a get a proper pair? I don’t want to start out on this journey on the wrong foot.
tailgater
13 years ago

Condescending. I was going for condescending. Which would encompass judgmental and to some extent narrow mindedness I suppose.

It as in no way meant as sarcasum. We all know that any liberal worth his salt has a well crafted pair of sandals . . . . .

Brewha wrote:



Birkenstocks.
Brewha
13 years ago

I don’t own any sandals. Does that disqualify me? If so, where can a get a proper pair? I don’t want to start out on this journey on the wrong foot.

dpnewell wrote:


No. A thousand mile journey begins with but one step (Birkenstocks not withstanding). Remember that the door and the pathway no meaning one the objective is in site. Also, If I define myself as that which is the definition, one cannot find fault with my conceptualization until one knows me as well as I do; which is impossible.

Say, to you like tofu?
dpnewell
13 years ago

No. A thousand mile journey begins with but one step (Birkenstocks not withstanding). Remember that the door and the pathway no meaning one the objective is in site. Also, If I define myself as that which is the definition, one cannot find fault with my conceptualization until one knows me as well as I do; which is impossible.

Say, to you like tofu?

Brewha wrote:




I tried it once, but my junk shrunk, I grew man breasts and had an overwhelming desire to watch "chic" fli....er Lifetime movies. Also tended to cry a lot and wanted reassuring hugs from other men. Ohhhhh, now I get it. Tofu is a required staple in a liberal man's diet. The wife is not going to be happy, but I guess I have to do what I have to do. So which do you prefer, silken or regular?
Brewha
13 years ago

I tried it once, but my junk shrunk, I grew man breasts and had an overwhelming desire to watch "chic" fli....er Lifetime movies. Also tended to cry a lot and wanted reassuring hugs from other men. Ohhhhh, now I get it. Tofu is a required staple in a liberal man's diet. The wife is not going to be happy, but I guess I have to do what I have to do. So which do you prefer, silken or regular?

dpnewell wrote:


Never tried it. This was in fact just a little test. You're really coming up short on the required empathy that liberals tend to have. No mater though . . . . Sorry about your man boobs. Whatever you do don't tell Wheel.

Now, it may help if you renounce some of your conservative views;
Abortion, it's a woman's right?
Helping the poor is a duty of society?
Where would you like to start? It's all Bush's fault?
hank56
13 years ago

Never tried it. This was in fact just a little test. You're really coming up short on the required empathy that liberals tend to have. No mater though . . . . Sorry about your man boobs. Whatever you do don't tell Wheel.

Now, it may help if you renounce some of your conservative views;
Abortion, it's a woman's right?
Helping the poor is a duty of society?
Where would you like to start? It's all Bush's fault?

Brewha wrote:




How about freedom of religion not from religion?
Freedom of speech?
The right to bear arms?


Users browsing this topic