Only Pereira, but I guess he's the only one that matters. Maybe GB wins anyway, but I'm nauseous.

erjaq wrote:

NFL Network guy said it was clearly not a catch. Didn't catch his name, watching the Garrett interview now.

Palama wrote:

If anyone browsing this thread wants the Colts, I got a last minute bet thread up.

bgz wrote:

Dallas was robbed!

Dallas was the far superior team today but made a couple of stupid mistakes and kept the game close enough for the refs to steal it from them.

crgcpro wrote:

If I would have only bet the line of 5.5. Bummer, looks like a push to me.

stinger88 wrote:

Well anyway, enjoy the win for as long as you can, I.e. one week. 😰

erjaq wrote:

If I would have only bet the line of 5.5. Bummer, looks like a push to me.

stinger88 wrote:

Karma baby, it's a bitch. Dallas didn't deserve to be in Grean Bay in the first place. [ram27bat]

Buckwheat wrote:

Dallas was robbed!

Dallas was the far superior team today but made a couple of stupid mistakes and kept the game close enough for the refs to steal it from them.

crgcpro wrote:

Um, Demarco Murray ran for 123. You don't need to throw the ball as much when you have a successful running game.

If you actually watched this game and thought GB was the better team, there's only one explanation -- you're a Packers fan.

erjaq wrote:

So cowpie fans are lacking math skills too.
Packers had like 100 more yards than the vags.
Rogers had over 300 yds and Lacy had over 100.
So you guys don't understand math or football.

Read it and weep, ladies:

http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=400749518 

banderl wrote: