Gene363
Monday, May 4, 2015 1:49:00 PM

Ssa is and has always been an entitlement program even according to its originators and the politicians of the day. Go back and read the vitriol. It makes for good reading.

We just like this particular entitlement program so do not want to apply the correct terminology to it.

teedubbya wrote:

I don't like it at all, but since I was forced to participate, I want my money back. I would love to have never participated, I could have contributed much more to my saving, IRA and 401k.

teedubbya
Monday, May 4, 2015 1:49:35 PM
Nope gene. Exact opposite. In insurance premium is tied to expenditure. That's the difference. Medical claims must remain within an acceptable percent of premium or premium must go up or the company goes under. Medicare has no such link.
teedubbya
Monday, May 4, 2015 1:50:50 PM
I don't like or dislike either of those two entitlement programs. They just are.
teedubbya
Monday, May 4, 2015 1:53:52 PM
By the way you could figure out how much you put in, apply an appropriate rate of compounding interest for that time period, then refuse to take more than that. Do the math, it might be interesting.
Mattie B
Monday, May 4, 2015 1:54:37 PM
Social security benefits are determined by personal contribution rates.

A good friend just realized he screwed himself. He has owned his own business for years. He paid himself a meek salary. He did take gain share bonuses and ect.

Well he has learned that is SS check will be fairly low due to his low contributions over the years.

His benefits are based on contributions.

Social security benefits are also taxable income.

teedubbya
Monday, May 4, 2015 2:00:19 PM
The payout structure is based on that but the link between that structure and contributions does not exist. And paying taxes on the benefit does not remove anything from the entitlement program category. The category is what it is.
teedubbya
Monday, May 4, 2015 2:02:08 PM
Medicaid often has a sliding scale based on income but there is no real link to the actual calculation. None.
teedubbya
Monday, May 4, 2015 2:04:46 PM
I know I'll never convince yall. Lol.

It's all good. Believe what you like. It really doesn't matter what we call it. We like those programs better than others. Nothing wrong with that.

Gene363
Monday, May 4, 2015 2:59:52 PM

By the way you could figure out how much you put in, apply an appropriate rate of compounding interest for that time period, then refuse to take more than that. Do the math, it might be interesting.

teedubbya wrote:

Even more interesting? Whatever is left when I croak goes to my heirs and not the government, at least for now.

SS and pensions promoted by so many over savings, evaporate entirely or if paid to a spouse are drastically cut when you die.

Gene363
Monday, May 4, 2015 3:10:16 PM

I know I'll never convince yall. Lol.

It's all good. Believe what you like. It really doesn't matter what we call it. We like those programs better than others. Nothing wrong with that.

teedubbya wrote:

One part of the problem are folks near retirement or retired, it's too late to change. We were compelled to participate so we are invested and it's too late to make alternative plans. I'm stuck with Medicare, my previous employer broke their promise to fund medial care, again when I was nearing retirement age. I do get a annual stipend to make up some of the difference, but it too is at their pleasure.

Had I known or foreseen this situation I would have taken measures years ago much as I had already done to save for retirement without counting on SS. As for not taking SS, I'll be happy to consider that when the government quits wasting money. 🍺

dstieger
Monday, May 4, 2015 3:19:23 PM
Maybe Logan's Run had it right. All we need is a Carousel.
Buckwheat
Monday, May 4, 2015 3:27:15 PM

so if we were the generation raised correctly, who raised the one that followed?

bet if you could go back and read stuff from one or two generations prior or talk to them, you'll hear them saying "what's the matter with kids today?"

just makes us the new old fogies!!! welcome to the circle of life.

frankj1 wrote:

+1 🌫

tonygraz
Monday, May 4, 2015 4:21:06 PM
In the earlier days of SSA, recipients got more money paid to them than they paid in. That has not been the case any more for decades. So now if people are getting less than what they paid in back, the program should continue to be solvent, if we could stop congres from hijacking the funds. Recently there are fewer and fewer companies paying pensions, so what are people to do who have little or nothing saved when they can no longer work ? Spend more on the military and nothing on the people sounds more like North Korea than the USA.
dstieger
Monday, May 4, 2015 4:25:26 PM

In the earlier days of SSA, recipients got more money paid to them than they paid in. That has not been the case any more for decades. So now if people are getting less than what they paid in back, the program should continue to be solvent, if we could stop congres from hijacking the funds. Recently there are fewer and fewer companies paying pensions, so what are people to do who have little or nothing saved when they can no longer work ? Spend more on the military and nothing on the people sounds more like North Korea than the USA.

tonygraz wrote:

What? Is there a supportable point in there somewhere?

Speyside
Monday, May 4, 2015 5:22:01 PM
But today you just read the man was shot dead

By a gun that didn't make any noise

But it wasn't the bullet that laid him to rest

Burner02
Monday, May 4, 2015 5:36:22 PM

so if we were the generation raised correctly, who raised the one that followed?

bet if you could go back and read stuff from one or two generations prior or talk to them, you'll hear them saying "what's the matter with kids today?"

just makes us the new old fogies!!! welcome to the circle of life.

frankj1 wrote:

Frank, there is a lot of truth in your post but do you think there was as much entitlement 10, 20, 30, or even 40 years ago?

frankj1
Monday, May 4, 2015 6:32:45 PM

Frank, there is a lot of truth in your post but do you think there was as much entitlement 10, 20, 30, or even 40 years ago?

Burner02 wrote:

no, I don't. It has taken a few generations for what used to be common expected behavior and some values to erode to where they are now...

but my grandmother's generation was freaking out when my father's generation started jumping in the aisles at Benny Goodman concerts, his generation freaked out at Elvis' hip wiggling, we all became desensitized to the need for hiding sexuality/nudity/porn...and each generation thought they were still purer than the next despite evidence to the contrary.

All the same stuff happened, much was quietly dealt with by extended family, and to me, the real game changer is that every word spoken, every move made, every action taken, seems to become news around the globe in seconds! "Nice" families hid their dirty laundry, today it's on youtube.

But the truth for me is it really does feel like what you are posting, but I like to remind myself that its just really the same thing...only different (another quotable for tailgater cuz I'm like a genius)

frankj1
Monday, May 4, 2015 6:34:44 PM

It would have had plenty of money exceptl Congress replaced the money it with IOUs and spent the money.

Gene363 wrote:

don't go there, people hate it when they find out Regan broke into the stash first! Then it was Katy Bar the Door.

frankj1
Monday, May 4, 2015 6:38:40 PM

+1 🌫

Buckwheat wrote:

yeah!

MACS
Monday, May 4, 2015 7:07:48 PM

well, you pay in now to be eligible later on, people on SS now are being paid by those working now...theoretically. So it's not really like an investment you tap later on.

frankj1 wrote:

It is a Ponzi scheme. And it is administered all wrong. As Cacman said... needs to be abolished. There are 24 year olds on it because they have 'anxiety'.