Anthony, you know you're my favorite LEO and you didn't make me feel better. The folks who own guns legally, especially from more rural areas, are more or less supplying the illegal gun "industry"? The supply is not from "look the other way" retailers...like when I bought booze as a kid?
May I assume the more rural areas of easier theft are also the areas with higher concentration of gun ownership?
Any idea what percent of legally purchased guns get stolen? Any idea what percent of stolen guns get reported?
And what punishment would the original owner face for "losing" a weapon?
I'm receiving quite an education today. I'm not setting you up, Anth, I'm relying on your accuracy. And I'm not expecting to be comforted.
frankj1 wrote:
Which is why I feel the way I feel about "common sense" gun legislation. Actually my answer was misleading. For that I apologize. I didn't mean to imply that living in a rural setting makes one more apt to be burglarized. High crime areas have more burglaries per capita than anywhere else. Most high crime areas are located in the city, not the countryside.
Only a small percentage of firearms are kept in safes. Most are kept in closets, either up high on a shelf, behind clothes that are hanging or hidden in dressor drawers. Most burglars know that. In addition most burglars know who has guns in the neighborhoods they are familiar with.
If one lives far enough from high crimes areas, they are marginally more secure because of distance barriers and randomness. When I said well populated I meant neighborhoods far from high crime areas.
As far the percentage of stolen guns that are reported, no idea. But, experience tells me that socio-economic demographic plays a huge roll in terms of what is and what is not reported. Most of your middle class and above are gonna report. Those that fall in or just above the poverty demographic usually live in higher crime areas and tend to under report for a variety of reasons.
Much like an illness one cannot treat the symptoms and expect to cure an illness. To successfully cure an illness one must treat the cause.
Crime isn't gonna go away. There will always be the 1, 3 and 5 %'ers who prey on the weak. Most of that group live at or near poverty level.
Take a look at the average pre-trial inmate. Most have been arrested numerous times. They will get out and go right back in. Usually for the same type crime. I've seen people get released in the morning and get locked back up the same day.
I remember one frequent flyer who got out one morning a few days before Christmas. He and his wife went Christmas shopping at Walmart later that day. For some reason they forgot to pass by a cashier on their way out. Instead of their kids spending Christmas with their parents, the spent them with someone else.
The only thing that will reduce crime is for those living in poverty to empower themselves. And they must do it themselves. There is a school of thought that says society must take care of those. But, if we are taking care of them, then there was is little incentive for them to take care of themselves. If one can put their hand out and have it filled, there is little incentive for them to produce.
I could go on, but I'm not sure it'll make any difference.