Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit is it....?
You may say you're not a noob. But you posted your thread in the wrong forum... therefore you are a noob.
You have no problem with her using bad statistics and cherry picked data because you believe "libs do it on a daily basis"... yeah. Smart move... lower your arguments to the lowest intellectual level you believe your opponents are using.... sh%t like that makes me convinced we will never get better as a society.
I'm pretty sure banning the most common weapons to kill people is just stupid. I'm going to guess there is a second reason the law wants to ban weapons such as assault rifles... when someone kills a person with a knife, it's pretty damn easy for the police, using hand guns, to arrest that person. When someone kills a person with an assault rifle, it becomes more risky for police to apprehend the suspect. But that's not really my problem. I don't want to ban anything.. I just am pointing out her dumb argument.
Who says we won't be able to get all military weapons? She said, and I quote: "As the right to bear arms must be maintained with the ability to resist government, military grade weapons cannot be peremptorily kept out of the hands of individuals as it is violative of their fundamental rights.". I literally support that 100%. I don't care if your neighbor wants an assault rifle, or a canister of weaponized smallpox... I have no problem with them owning it. Do you? If you want a musket too, that's fine, I don't really care. But the instant you tell your neighbor they can't have a nuke you've started restricting the 2nd amendment.
victor809 wrote:
