ZRX1200
  • ZRX1200
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
6 years ago
WEST GLACIER, Mont. – Glacier National Park is removing signs that state all glaciers will be melted by 2020.

Park spokeswoman Gina Kurzmen explained that since the early 2000s, scientists have reflected and analyzed data stating glaciers would recede by 2020.

Kurzmen told KPAX that the latest research shows shrinking, but in ways much more complex than what was predicted. Because of this, the park must update all signs around the park stating all glaciers will be melted by 2020.

The indoor and wayside exhibits have been updated throughout the park including at the Apgar, Logan Pass and St. Mary visitor centers, according to Kurzmen. She also told KPAX that an exterior panel at St. Mary still displays out-of-date language but is planned to be replaced later this year.

Kurzmen says Glacier National Park will work with the US Geological Survey to monitor the glaciers and update the remainder of the signs as necessary.
frankj1
6 years ago
I don't care what Fox says, I did not make any money on this science gaffe.
DrafterX
6 years ago
You want i should help you collect..?? 😕
Tittums
6 years ago
frankj1
6 years ago

You want i should help you collect..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:


nah. get some rest.
I heard you did yeoman's work this week.
teedubbya
6 years ago
The 2017 study that began the removal of the signs due to the changing forecast indicated some of the ice formations lost 85% of their size but average shrinkage was only 39%. So I guess it’s ok.

I will say from personal experience their is a noticeable difference in Alaska from 5-6 years ago. My pictures show that as well.

Caused by humans or stoppable? I dunno. Happening? Yes.
Tittums
6 years ago

Caused by humans or stoppable? I dunno. Happening? Yes.

teedubbya wrote:



I am sure if we bankrupt every country on the planet except for China we can reverse it. That always seems to be the progressive solution. Everyone sacrifices except for China.
DrafterX
6 years ago
Poor baby seals... 😞
teedubbya
6 years ago
Tittums the funny part is your vitriol is just as bad as the spaz on the other side of your pet issues. You are very similar to that which you despise. I still think most folks are reasonable and do not believe the with me or against me crap.

I do believe the glaciers are shrinking. Humans may or may not be a part of it. There are zealots that are sure they are and zealots that are sure they are not. To them it’s a game. To the rest of us maybe we can figure something out. Maybe not.

And eff the baby seals. I’d grind them and spotted owls up if it gave me a cheaper fuel alternative.
DrafterX
6 years ago
Mr. Jones
6 years ago
I blame all the manetee's farting in Florida.
Tittums
6 years ago

Tittums the funny part is your vitriol is just as bad as the spaz on the other side of your pet issues. You are very similar to that which you despise. I still think most folks are reasonable and do not believe the with me or against me crap.

I do believe the glaciers are shrinking. Humans may or may not be a part of it. There are zealots that are sure they are and zealots that are sure they are not. To them it’s a game. To the rest of us maybe we can figure something out. Maybe not.

And eff the baby seals. I’d grind them and spotted owls up if it gave me a cheaper fuel alternative.

teedubbya wrote:



I never denied shrinkage/climate change. I simply stated all I hear from the left on ANY of the news outlets is how we need to bankrupt nations while never acknowledging Chinese contribution to CO2. Whether or not there is half a country that believes bankrupting nations is the solution I have no clue.

The last Democrat debate flat out said it is too late to change things and asked candidates if they are willing to relocate people because of flooding that cannot be prevented at this point. These people want to become President and they are nutjobs.
tailgater
6 years ago



Caused by humans or stoppable? I dunno. Happening? Yes.

teedubbya wrote:




Yet, if one were to say this out loud they'd be accused of being a denier and anti-science.


DrafterX
6 years ago
I've said it many times...but i do question the data... 😟
teedubbya
6 years ago

Yet, if one were to say this out loud they'd be accused of being a denier and anti-science.


tailgater wrote:




I don’t seem to have that issue. Maybe you get what you seek.
tailgater
6 years ago

I don’t seem to have that issue. Maybe you get what you seek.

teedubbya wrote:




Explain it to victor.

Tittums
6 years ago

Yet, if one were to say this out loud they'd be accused of being a denier and anti-science.


tailgater wrote:



Dude, check this out man. You know what is science? Freakin biological science? Two genders bro. Two freaking genders.
Mind + 💣 poof.
tailgater
6 years ago

Dude, check this out man. You know what is science? Freakin biological science? Two genders bro. Two freaking genders.
Mind + 💣 poof.

Tittums wrote:



Good segue.

If you dwell on that kinda stuff.





Tittums
6 years ago

Good segue.

If you dwell on that kinda stuff.

tailgater wrote:



The force is no longer the force, it is from now on called "The Vagina" I knew The Vagina could surround us, bind the galaxy together, but penetrating us? That's some new stuff right there bro. Star wars has become vagina. A very loose vagina because JJ Abrams destroyed that putang.
frankj1
6 years ago
put more milk in the next White Russian!
Users browsing this topic