teedubbya
6 years ago
HockeyDad
6 years ago
You better bring wearing a mask when you did that sigh.
teedubbya
6 years ago
I am. It makes me look like the Lone Ranger.
delta1
6 years ago
lotta knuckleheads ignore the "wear a mask orders" and local law enforcement have publicly said they won't enforce them...knuckleheads threatened the life of an Orange County Public Health Director who was proposing to mandate masks, so she resigned...

we haven't really practiced EVERYBODY wearing a mask in CA...

then the Gov caved to pressure from the knuckleheads to re-open, and they all jumped into the bars and had parties: no masks and no distancing as was recommended in the re-opening guidelines

and here we are ...with higher numbers than before, and the largest number of infected under 40 (knuckleheads)
DrafterX
6 years ago
TW doesn't wear masks... he sprays everyone he sees... prolly leaves boogers on door handles too... 😟
delta1
6 years ago
🤒
delta1
6 years ago
Speyside
6 years ago
Actually the infection rate in New York is low 1.6% last time I checked. New Jersey is slightly higher. Illinois is about 2.7%. Most red states are high. There are a few outliers there also. Arizona 20.4%, Florida 14.2%, Texas 10.6%. The difference being? Prolly masks are one of the factors. Wear a mask, it will help keep the economy open.
teedubbya
6 years ago
Never understood popo publicly saying they wouldn’t enforce a law. I understand triage and pick battles but to step into the politics up front isn’t their place.
HockeyDad
6 years ago

Actually the infection rate in New York is low 1.6% last time I checked. New Jersey is slightly higher. Illinois is about 2.7%. Most red states are high. There are a few outliers there also. Arizona 20.4%, Florida 14.2%, Texas 10.6%. The difference being? Prolly masks are one of the factors. Wear a mask, it will help keep the economy open.

Speyside wrote:



Based solely on the current positive test rate (not infection rate) it looks like NY and NJ were the best states at handling the ‘Rona. (If you ignore all the infections and deaths they’ve already had)

They maybe should have got masks back when we were told to not get masks.
Speyside
6 years ago
You look at the wrong statistic. The rate of infecting has always been the important statistic. Rate of infection is population dependant. At this point nothing should be ignored. It should be attempted to be understood. But low infection percentage will keep the economy improving. The argument can been made that people don't care. I think Arizona would be a good example of that. Many people do care and will not patronize businesses that they don't feel relatively safe entering. Infection percentage is an important issue in that regard.
tonygraz
6 years ago
I recently heard that CT and RI were doing the best, but I don't know what statistics that was based on. CT, NY and NJ have been trying to match restrictions.
Speyside
6 years ago
Trump will tell us again we have beat this and it is nothing. A leader speaks many die.
frankj1
6 years ago
is it a sin for Pence to lie?
izonfire
6 years ago

is it a sin for Pence to lie?

frankj1 wrote:


It’s not a lie if he believes in it.
Have faith Papa...
frankj1
6 years ago

It’s not a lie if he believes in it.
Have faith Papa...

izonfire wrote:


George Costanza said it's not a lie if you believe it.
fiddler898
6 years ago

is it a sin for Pence to lie?

frankj1 wrote:



Only if he is in a room alone with the lie and lies with the lie.
engletl
6 years ago

The data I've been looking at suggests the same thing. But until then, it's showing that millions of people will die and stuff.

If this is correct we'll take the credit for it. If it's wrong we'll just get a new model and if we scare people enough nobody will call BS about our first 10 models that were incorrect.


RobertHively wrote:


That sounds exactly like how they model hurricanes too
BuckyB93
6 years ago
Nah, they've been modeling hurricanes and weather patterns for a long time and have a large enough data that these predictions are more accurate.

I find it odd that with all the study, supercomputers, historical data that we have for modeling the weather they still can't tell us with great accuracy as to how much rain we will get next week. Yet with only a few months of data collected over a small percentage of the population the experts have models that they claim predicts what to expect from the virus this coming fall.

I've even heard it said that "...the numbers to me have been surprisingly predictable. Almost vanilla."

And... "This virus is pretty predictable. It is doing what modeling suggests and when variables change it does what you would think. It is pretty vanilla"

And..."This thing is closely following predictable models given how you change variables. It's really weird in this regard. It's really not that difficult to predict what it will do given certain actions. It really is vanilla in the context of how these things usually work."

But it's coming from the experts so we shouldn't dare question them.
engletl
6 years ago
Lol...ok. Living in hurricane alley brings a different perspective to the "models" and the 24/7 doom and gloom bombardment when a storm enters the gulf.

And then, after the storm does its own thing. Sometimes the models are pretty much right but quite often they arent.
Users browsing this topic