nope, wasn't practice.
in fact, wasn't even due to an urge.

actually never even happened. we call that humor, it's one of the good progressive qualities I guess.

Ray, if you don't support libs or cons, why do you only trash libs?
Better yet, it's too easy to throw barbs, condemn and dismantle verbally. What are you actually for...you, not quotes from writers?

frankj1 wrote:

I know some people here, like bgz don't think reading historic texts or the works of other writers is important. He calls that "indoctrination" and the "antithesis to free thought". It reeks of 1984ish "ignorance is strength" to me. He has no problem with "historic literature though being banned from a curriculum" because he thinks "sh*t gets dated and is no longer relevant." Now that's a totally weird form of indoctrination and a perversion of free thinking itself but that's pure modern libthink, because of their self-importance and innate genius that no old dead guy could possibly have matched, the only thing that matters is the present and the only thoughts that matter are whatever crap might come out of their head at any given time.

RayRay wrote:

Lol... you misinterpreted what I said yet again...

Let me explain it to you... the time allotted to teach kids is finite and is relatively static (meaning it's not changing any time soon). You also have an exponentially growing body of information. You only have so much time to get the best information available into those little heads.

You think horse and buggies and sh*t are worth dwelling on... I prefer aircraft carriers and rocket ships... those are probably more relevant in todays world... well maybe not your world... but we don't design curriculums for your world.

bgz wrote:

you don't have to believe everything you think.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

Frank, the leftist BLM Orcs tried to burn down the library during the Louisville riot last night. I guess book burning is still fashionable in some Progressive circles. Kentucky Democrat Rep. Attica Scott was arrested after, along with her daughter and is facing charges of first-degree rioting, failure to disperse and unlawful assembly. I don't think she got the memo from her imperious leader Joe Biden that taking part in rioting and burning is bad.

Now back to your assertion that I only trash libs. It's not true at all, I trash cons, neocons mostly when they act like libs. It's easy to throw barbs, condemn and dismantle them verbally. They do most of the setup work but it's a learned libertarian talent to see their unique evil through their public facade.

I know some people here, like bgz don't think reading historic texts or the works of other writers is important. He calls that "indoctrination" and the "antithesis to free thought". It reeks of 1984ish "ignorance is strength" to me. He has no problem with "historic literature though being banned from a curriculum" because he thinks "sh*t gets dated and is no longer relevant." Now that's a totally weird form of indoctrination and a perversion of free thinking itself but that's pure modern libthink, because of their self-importance and innate genius that no old dead guy could possibly have matched, the only thing that matters is the present and the only thoughts that matter are whatever crap might come out of their head at any given time.

RayR wrote:

I tried to give you the stage to offer a view, but you resorted to posting about a news clip to justify hate and blamed other objects of that hate for setting themselves up for it... and for being "evil".

Next you trashed another poster's views (incorrectly) on history texts and their value in education.
But mostly when asked for your specific thoughts on what you'd want to better lead this country, you post opinion pieces and lectures.

Do you have a formulated picture of a better way to govern more specific than educating us by posting opinion pieces on historic (and certainly important) historical figures? Are there any nations employing that system that might help me get a better grasp on what you are "pro" rather than the repeated "con" positions?

After all the words, I still have no idea if you are proposing we dump the office of President and do away with courts because we should count on everyone to behave responsibly.

Also, one thing seems to linger in my mind...your use of "evil". It just feels like you and I use that word differently...I don't use it to identify satanic people and behavior, but sometimes I sense you do.

Not always easy to discern mood when reading what others post, but I hope you are not feeling attacked, set up, or even made fun of for your opinions, just looking to get some clarification.

frankj1 wrote:

Now that you have looked into each other yard's. Put your shades on, have some drinks and a cigar, and try to get some understanding of each other opinions.

Talk sh*t might as well get sh*t face too.

Smooth light wrote:

was Fahrenheit 451 ever burned?

frankj1 wrote:

hilarious

delta1 wrote:

You'll burning in hell 🔥 hilarious 🤣.

Solvent green; taste like chicken.

Smooth light wrote:

what took ya so long?

frankj1 wrote:

Don't be ridiculous Rocketman, I understood perfectly what you said.
You advocate pumping leftist progressive drivel into their little heads which is really just repackaged stale ancient balderdash and making them believe it's a new enlightenment, shiny and new, ideas the world has never seen before. Ban and censor anything that would challenge their indoctrination in the socialist school curriculum lest they find out what they were told was hogwash!
Ya, that's about right. Hey! it worked on you, didn't it?

RayR wrote:

Leftist propaganda like.. Math? More accurate history? Economics?... which one... physics?

So if not leftist propaganda... then what?

What would RayRay's fantasy curriculum entail... please enlighten us.

bgz wrote: