DrafterX
5 years ago

Trump's suckers have donated more than $200 Million to his phony fund-raising "I'm a Loser of a Fraudulent Rigged Election" campaign...


Trump is profiting from the gullibility of his minions

delta1 wrote:



How must would you have donated if the tables were turned..?? Because there's no doubt Biden would be doing the same thing... 😟
Dg west deptford
5 years ago
The Supreme Court Justices are just streamlining these cases.
Texas & Louisiana filed along with 7other states last night, insisting voter fraud runs high in these battleground states that have violated election laws.
SCOTUS must overturn the fraudulent Biden wins.

Are there legislators with courage to insist on lawful signature verification, voting rules & procedures?

We saw fraud in this election we've never seen before. On a scale that is huge.

God bless Texas! For the Bill of complaint. State vs. State.

PA is going to have to answer why a court can rule against state & federal law? - Electors clause!

Constitutional challenges can correct all that these lower courts have fouled on.
Fighting to ensure election integrity!
Speyside
5 years ago
"The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied," the court said.
Brewha
5 years ago

How must would you have donated if the tables were turned..?? Because there's no doubt Biden would be doing the same thing... 😟

DrafterX wrote:


You mean like when they stole the election from Hillary?

Good point man, good point....
Brewha
5 years ago



We saw fraud in this election we've never seen before. !

Dg west deptford wrote:



Actually, no one saw it....
Speyside
5 years ago
Every one of those cases will be denied. SCOTUS just set a precedent. Injunctive relief was denied as it should have been.

Unless of course you want to argue that your legal interpretation is more accurate than the actual SCOTUS statement is.

SCOTUS just reaffirmed what we already knew. They have no political affiliation. They rule based on the constitution.
delta1
5 years ago
not surprising it was 9-0....Trump's legal challenges to the election results have been overwhelmingly laughed out of the lower courts, even by some of the same judges Trump appointed...

seems even Giuliani can't lie in court, chancing a perjury charge, and testified they "are not alleging fraud" when the Judge asks for evidence of fraud...
DrafterX
5 years ago

You mean like when they stole the election from Hillary?

Good point man, good point....

Brewha wrote:




No one challenged Hillary's loss cause she sucks.. 😟
Brewha
5 years ago

No one challenged Hillary's loss cause she sucks.. 😟

DrafterX wrote:


That was a dream you had man.

Member you saw her boobs?
DrafterX
5 years ago
Ya , but I think she was 15 at that time..... 😰
delta1
5 years ago

No one challenged Hillary's loss cause she sucks.. 😟

DrafterX wrote:



especially exHillarating when she takes her teeth out...
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
5 years ago

The Supreme Court Justices are just streamlining these cases.
Texas & Louisiana filed along with 7other states last night, insisting voter fraud runs high in these battleground states that have violated election laws.
SCOTUS must overturn the fraudulent Biden wins.

Are there legislators with courage to insist on lawful signature verification, voting rules & procedures?

We saw fraud in this election we've never seen before. On a scale that is huge.

God bless Texas! For the Bill of complaint. State vs. State.

PA is going to have to answer why a court can rule against state & federal law? - Electors clause!

Constitutional challenges can correct all that these lower courts have fouled on.
Fighting to ensure election integrity!

Dg west deptford wrote:



Has anyone told you that you're stupid yet?

If not, you're stupid.

You're welcome.
teedubbya
5 years ago

The Supreme Court Justices are just streamlining these cases.
Texas & Louisiana filed along with 7other states last night, insisting voter fraud runs high in these battleground states that have violated election laws.
SCOTUS must overturn the fraudulent Biden wins.

Are there legislators with courage to insist on lawful signature verification, voting rules & procedures?

We saw fraud in this election we've never seen before. On a scale that is huge.

God bless Texas! For the Bill of complaint. State vs. State.

PA is going to have to answer why a court can rule against state & federal law? - Electors clause!

Constitutional challenges can correct all that these lower courts have fouled on.
Fighting to ensure election integrity!

Dg west deptford wrote:




Lol
frankj1
5 years ago

especially exHillarating when she takes her teeth out...

delta1 wrote:


Post of the Year Candidate!

Conan, is it too late?
rfenst
5 years ago

No one challenged Hillary's loss cause she sucks.. 😟

DrafterX wrote:


Simply because she and her people accepted the fact she lost
JadeRose
5 years ago

Again, just the emergency consideration docket.
That's all they denied.
They're waiting on a lower ruling before they actually rule.

That's the way it works
What's the rush b ?
Lawful orderly investigation making you nervous about the cheating?

Dg west deptford wrote:





I'm with you on all this but maybe for a different reason. Everyone is upset that Trump won't concede....why would he? He's making a fortune off his idiot base and this gives you and all those people something to do. The rest of the world has moved on, of course, but Trump and the Trumpettes have got something to bitch about on Parler while the rest of us can enjoy our Christmas Holiday season relatively free of all the bleating. I hope the Secret Service has to literally drag him outta the WH. Perfect ending.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
5 years ago
Yes, I would love to see that!!!

See some extraordinarily fat man named tiny dragging the big T out by his ear... that would be amazing... I kinda want to see it.
Speyside
5 years ago
IN HANDCUFFS!
tonygraz
5 years ago
I wonder if any of the trumpettes ever wondered why trump never did anything about the so-called election rigging since he was talking about it for months before the election.
Poor lyin' Ted won't get to argue the case.
rfenst
5 years ago
He's got no business arguing anything pertaining to Pennsylvania's election laws. There are plenty of lawyers who are experts in PA election law because that is all they do.
Users browsing this topic