My 4 year old farted this morning and then she looked up and said "Ewwww, it stinks worse than California!"

Stogie1020 wrote:

In California we would make her get a Covid-19 test. Farting is a possible symptom. Complaining about California is a guaranteed symptom.

HockeyDad wrote:

I'm all for following science but during this whole COVID thing, the use of science has been bastardized. Politics, money, and ego has been the main drivers, not science. Preliminary conclusions have been been accepted as facts and when new data and evidence that doesn't support the preliminary conclusions come to light, they are squashed or glossed over.

The hysteria, fear, has been cemented in. The "fix" has been implemented even though the fix hasn't fixed much... yet they keep doubling down and are not willing to back up and say... well... we might have over reacted on it. The magic bullet isn't very magic, and all that crap we've been feeding you for the past 18 months... we can't back off on it. The horse is out of the barn so full steam ahead.

BuckyB93 wrote:

On Friday, December 10, New York State governor Kathy Hochul reaffirmed the state’s status as the nation’s most zealous practitioner of covid cultism with the announcement of a new statewide “vax-or-mask” mandate.

The mandate confronts businesses and physical institutions with a choice: either A) check vaccination at the door and turn away unvaccinated customers or 😎 require that all customers wear masks. Noncompliant property owners are threatened with a $1,000 fine and subject to “criminal and civil penalties.” Governor Hochul justifies the new mandate by citing concerns over the new omicron variant and New York’s strained healthcare system. The mandate will take effect on Monday, December 13.

The Definition of Insanity
For this new set of policies, the old adage “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing and expecting a different result” comes to mind. Anyone who actually “follows the science” will see that this newest mandate (or any of the previous other dystopian policies we have been subject to) is about “public health” insofar as that means protecting the health of the community. Both measures involved in the mandate—coercive vaccination and mandatory masking—have little (if any evidence) supporting their efficacy.

More...

https://mises.org/wire/new-york-state-has-imposed-new-covid-rituals-time-theres-some-resistance 

I'm convinced this is why our resident covid 19 expert and vaccine proponent teedubbya has been absent lately.

He was 100% full of ****, talking out his ass holio, and now he doesn't want to face any criticism or questions.

He does have Brewha to carry the torch. Tim is smart enough to know when he's whooped. Brewha is too stupid.

MACS wrote:

Frank, why do you even look at the politics section? It isn't a fun place for you, you don't have anything to say like... about POLITICS, and you don't seem a bit interested like when someone talks about....well POLITICS. Did this used to be the cheesy joke section before and it was just misnamed POLITICS?

RayR wrote:

Screaming to anyone who can hear him how he's still right and everyone else is still wrong. All that data. Can't ask questions, NO! That's a threat to the blind obedience that the Science requires.

He didn't face anything when he was here. Just kept refuting everything with links to the CDC from different sources.

I wouldn't trust that dullard with a match. He's only going to burn himself!

DrMaddVibe wrote:

He's saying your narrative is tired... and I simply ran out of novel ways to call you an idiot.

bgz wrote:

Frank has no narrative so that's his safe place, he doesn't have to worry about having a position and being contentious.
That's what I call the mushy middle.

You are more callous, you don't give a chit what you say. That's OK, you like playing the devil's advocate, at least you give us an opportunity to make fun of the stuff you say.

RayR wrote:

what you call it is insignificant.
I'm reasonably comfortable that 98.2% here understand my beliefs, and equally certain that many aren't as clear about what you'd really have happen given the chance...which will never occur.

frankj1 wrote:

Wow, 98.2%? Was that from a scientific CBID poll? 🤔

RayR wrote: