Someone was actually banned for questioning a blend? Who banned him? How does that violate the rulz?
LeeBot wrote:
Several answers of the many. First is a Cuban that happens to be my favorite. Monte Cristo #2. I had a great connection at the time. I had bought 6 boxes in 1987 and in the early 90s all Cubans took a big hit. I think it was a hurricane but I'm not positive. But I gave them after 3 years to replenish my supply and the taste had changed big time. I've tried them several times over the years and they've never returned to the cigars they once were. They are good but not great. I have 3 and a piece boxes ot 1987 stash left and I smoke one or two a year. No they aren't for sale as they can't be replaced.
stogieflyz wrote:
It is generally agreed that "the Cuban profile" from before the early 1990s changed quite a bit to a lighter profile around mid 1990s. This was across the board with most all brands participating. I never saw a good explanation for the changes but hurricanes might have been a factor. Also the cigar boom in those years caused a shortage of the best tobaccos and rollers which lead to some major construction issues around 2000-2001.
deadeyedick wrote:
So kinda, sorta surmising that prior to the profile change, earlier Cubans were the reason for the “Cuban cigars are so strong” characterization?
Palama wrote:
The CigarBid Forums uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close