delta1 wrote:When the enemy of our country acts in a way to disrupt our democratic process, that can be defined as an attack or act of war. If a citizen assists that enemy in this conduct of undermining our democracy, isn't that treason?
Regardless of what Russia intended, it is benefiting from a distracted and sputtering US federal govt. with a sympathetic Commander in Chief in charge...
Regardless of whether any person is charged criminally, shouldn't we know what Russia did so that we can prevent that from happening again?
Regardless of who know what (Trump, his staff, etc), what is it that Russia did?
I hear that so-and-so is "tied to Russia".
Or "had contact with Russians".
Over what?
Economic secrets?
Area 51?
That caviar is friggin fish eggs?
The liberal left is squirming in their seats because people whose job requirement includes dealing with foreign nations may have actually had contact with people from Russia.
I know that there is an implied evil twist here, but I haven't heard what it is.
The implication here is that simply contacting a Russian is somehow treasonous.
When adults debate we usually base the dialog on tangibles and facts or we at the very least provide context to the subject matter.
The media and her hoards of driveling lefties are doing nothing more than shaking trees and hoping the apple that falls out reveals what has to this point been entirely undefined.