America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

What political office does he hold. I thought he was a private citizen.

As you know he no longer holds office but you also know he is still very plugged in and may run again. Same for Palin et.al. And they unabashadly hold themselves out as rrpresenting the rigjt They are political and are representing/shaping one side/view.

If you are going to play the disingenuous game remember that when Jesse, Al gore, Sharpten etc act up. We will institute a new rule that only folks holding office are considered politicians.

Not gonna edit cause the mobile version sucks.

And since I never ignored the original argument, but used the boycott as supporting evidence, it isn't a strawman argument.

Can't find one right now, may not exist. But as rumsfeld said, "the absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence." :)

It all goes back to if you ignore or discount all the variables that contradict my view then you suck and I win.

The very argument that this all occurred in a vacuum and the lefties made a big issue out of it while the right had nothing to do with it does just that.

I consider it normal politics and I like it. When someone can look into the camera and say something they know (and everyone else knows) is inaccurate it's a beatific thing.

I hate the iPhone keypad.

Boycott the IPhones..!!

Hd you do not define what I need to find or not. You may want to but you don't.

Those are politicians and are constantly either running for an office or leveraging political power. Most even have PACs. Under your narrow view Romney isn't a politician because he holds no office and hasn't for a long time. It's silly.

Perhaps we should stop calling Palin, Romney and Huckabe governor.

You can define it however you want but the basic fact is the people you cited have absolutely no governing authority. It doesn't equate to actual mayors making actual threats to abuse their power as elected officials.

Romney wants to be a politician again but isn't going to be.

I don't call any of them governor. Why would someone do that? They're ex-governors. Heck, Palin even quit.

A quick look will find what you are looking for hd. More powerful than mayors yet none of them have any real power to back up their posturing including the two doofus mayors.

By the way it's proper to call them governor but I'm with you on not doing so.

Well poke around then or is this just a data point?! I would think the liberal media would be reporting this. I would think they're out hunting for it.

Make no doubt that Chick-Fil-A won huge on this whole thing and the gay-homo militant extremists got punched in the throat. ....but Chick-Fil-A didn't start it.

Just check fox news for a list of the representatives. It'd easy peasy. Then you can progress to the senators etc.

Those are sitting in office but that is not what I said when referencing Huckabe.

I said politicians which sometimes are in office, sometimes are out, sometimes are currently running, sometimes are not.

Romney is a politician. Palin is too. So is Gore etc.

What are you trying to do? Don't we have enough straw men?

I am aware of the list. What special treatment have they given to Chick-FIl-A in response to three mayors promising to ban them from their cities?

What have the mayors actually done other than shoot their mouths off?

Have been hounding? Effin auto correct.

You actually beleive Romney is not a politician? That says enough for me.

And I've never stated sitting in office is the mark. I stated politicians on both sides are in this game and it's not just one.

Funny thing politics, when everyone agrees its boring and goes away. But when two sides clash its great fun

I don't condone the mayors comments. Both of those guys are ass wipes.

I'm just not going to pretend its one sided.

Well Z, you never answered my question.

If there was a thread (I don't know because I wasn't hanging around here in Feb) it was deleted (not horribly unlikely since I'm sure fuzz would have posted on it), but since there is no longer one we'll have to do a real-time poll.

Z, do you support the JCP boycott by Million Moms?

You know HD doesn't believe that. With him it's all smoke and mirrors. He's trying to get you to look a different direction while he diddles you.

chances are we just didn't get the gay-homo militant extremist news feed.....

That's the fault of the Democrat-mandated education system.

I never even said the thread existed, just that the same individuals support one boycott who are claiming to be under attack now. These groups are well documented in the news as taking both stances. Since 98.2% of our forum posters take their opinions directly from these groups, it's a pretty good bet where they stood during that time. Since I can't find a thread, I'm asking for real time information...

Actually, a boycott is much more severe to a company.

Think about it for two seconds. The mayor of boston said that he doesn't want CFA in his city. Did CFA ever say they wanted to be in Boston? Is Boston next on their expansion plan? Is there any indication that they were even thinking of opening a franchise in boston? Unless there is, then his threat is absolutely meaningless and will remain so until his city becomes one they are interested in expanding to (at which time the mayors would likely have changed).

A boycott goes after real-time revenue. If successful it can have a severe impact on cashflow for a company.

I never misstated your position. I just pointed out that you and I are politicians under it as well.