America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by DrafterX. 233 replies replies.
5 Pages<12345>
stock up on twinkies...
cacman Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
sd72 wrote:
It was only five thousand bakers who held out, but 18,500 lost their jobs due to the shutdown. If the news report on tv is accurate. So 5000 employees taking an eight percent cut on $33,000 equals?

$13,200,000.

What's the cost of pay, bonuses, retirement, and perks for the white collar employees?

Why does the guy making $33000 have to carry the costs of everything? Maybe we should all make min wage, that's $16000 a year! Gross. Not net.

If it was a non union company, they would just do it, and it wouldn't make the news. There'd be 5000 more people living at poverty level. Pretty soon we won't be able to buy the crap were importing from china.

After the majority of people get driven into the streets, and the corporations rule, like in the early 1900s, well have another wave of organizing. Just like then. And why? Because those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it. And apparently most here are of that sort.

Why is there never common ground? Corporate profits are at an average all time high, but that's not the workers business to worry about. Is it?

My understanding - The union workers did not agree to the pay cuts, and changes in health and retirement benefits. But all other non-union workers did agree to the same pay cut. So 5,000 union workers cost the other 13,500 non-union workers their job, plus the closure.
DrafterX Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,595
greedy bassards.... Mad
sd72 Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
I'm pretty sure that's what I said.
Stinkdyr Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
sd72 wrote:
It was only five thousand bakers who held out, but 18,500 lost their jobs due to the shutdown. If the news report on tv is accurate. So 5000 employees taking an eight percent cut on $33,000 equals?

$13,200,000.

What's the cost of pay, bonuses, retirement, and perks for the white collar employees?

Why does the guy making $33000 have to carry the costs of everything? Maybe we should all make min wage, that's $16000 a year! Gross. Not net.

If it was a non union company, they would just do it, and it wouldn't make the news. There'd be 5000 more people living at poverty level. Pretty soon we won't be able to buy the crap were importing from china.

After the majority of people get driven into the streets, and the corporations rule, like in the early 1900s, well have another wave of organizing. Just like then. And why? Because those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it. And apparently most here are of that sort.

Why is there never common ground? Corporate profits are at an average all time high, but that's not the workers business to worry about. Is it?



Maybe you missed my post where I said this:

Maybe the Bakers' Union can pool their pension assets, buy the plants, trucks etc in liquidation.......then run the company right and pay themselves whatever they want!

I say go for it........just don't force the taxpayer to fund the project, like GM.




Herfing
dpnewell Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
sd72 wrote:
It was only five thousand bakers who held out, but 18,500 lost their jobs due to the shutdown. If the news report on tv is accurate. So 5000 employees taking an eight percent cut on $33,000 equals?

$13,200,000.

What's the cost of pay, bonuses, retirement, and perks for the white collar employees?

Why does the guy making $33000 have to carry the costs of everything? Maybe we should all make min wage, that's $16000 a year! Gross. Not net.

If it was a non union company, they would just do it, and it wouldn't make the news. There'd be 5000 more people living at poverty level. Pretty soon we won't be able to buy the crap were importing from china.

After the majority of people get driven into the streets, and the corporations rule, like in the early 1900s, well have another wave of organizing. Just like then. And why? Because those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it. And apparently most here are of that sort.

Why is there never common ground? Corporate profits are at an average all time high, but that's not the workers business to worry about. Is it?



cacman already pointed out the flaws in your argument, but let me reiterate. Non-union workers, as well as The Teamsters already agreed to the new terms, so my original numbers are spot on. Five thousand who refused to compromise in a time of economic downturn (thanks to our gracious President), cost 13,500 of their fellow workers their jobs. But, got to defend the union at all costs, no matter who suffers. Wonder what the Teamsters who lost their jobs think of the Baker's Union?

Oh, and if we ask the rich to pay just a little bit more, it’s going to fix the deficit. HAAAA! The crap you libs swallow is a freak’n riot!!!!!!!!! But America has spoken. 52% of voters love to swallow crap.
HockeyDad Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
sd72 wrote:
After the majority of people get driven into the streets, and the corporations rule, like in the early 1900s, well have another wave of organizing. Just like then. And why? Because those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it. And apparently most here are of that sort.



Only Rickamaven was alive in the early 1900s.
HockeyDad Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
sd72 wrote:
Because those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it.



You mean like the way unions keep killing companies and don't learn from the lesson?
HockeyDad Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
sd72 wrote:
Corporate profits are at an average all time high, but that's not the workers business to worry about. Is it?



I can think of one company where profits are not at an average all time high. The workers decided it wasn't their business to worry about it.
teedubbya Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
it sounds like the industry is over capacity anyway. stupd time to strike, but maybe just hurrying things along
HockeyDad Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Stinkdyr wrote:
Maybe you missed my post where I said this:

Maybe the Bakers' Union can pool their pension assets, buy the plants, trucks etc in liquidation.......then run the company right and pay themselves whatever they want!

I say go for it........just don't force the taxpayer to fund the project, like GM.



This sounds like an excellent idea and probably a great investment. They should know since they work there.
Brewha Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
dpnewell wrote:

Oh, and if we ask the rich to pay just a little bit more, it’s going to fix the deficit. HAAAA! The crap you libs swallow is a freak’n riot!!!!!!!!! But America has spoken. 52% of voters love to swallow crap.


78% of statistics are made up on the spot.
dpnewell Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
HockeyDad wrote:
This sounds like an excellent idea and probably a great investment. They should know since they work there.


No, the union would never buy the plants. They couldn't afford the labor costs. Whistle
HockeyDad Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
dpnewell wrote:
No, the union would never buy the plants. They couldn't afford the labor costs. Whistle



well maybe the labor union would take a pay cut......oh I see what you did there. You led me into that trap.
sd72 Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
Yes. ^ Just because I'm union, doesn't mean live or die by it. Ill be non union soon. Right to work is in the Michigan law machine as we speak.

Maybe my point has been missed as well, I'm not a wordsmith as some of you can be.

Common ground, equality, a company wanting their employees to prosper for the good of both. Not make me a billionaire as I watch you starve from business. Not pay me till it bleeds from employees. I think maybe this approach is about the only one that fits what this country is supposed to be about.

Call me naive.
HockeyDad Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
^Naive.
HockeyDad Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
You assume that a union is required to achieve common ground, equality, a company wanting their employees to prosper for the good of both.

A lot of companies and employees are doing just fine without unions.
teedubbya Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
seems to be a lot of twink lovers in here. yall know more about it than me
HockeyDad Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
teedubbya wrote:
seems to be a lot of twink lovers in here. yall know more about it than me



You spelled twinkie wrong.
teedubbya Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
HockeyDad wrote:
You spelled twinkie wrong.


no I didn't...


speaking of twinks how are ya HD?
ZRX1200 Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,682
Heard Rush this morning blaming the union completely for this. I think there is some blame there but the 800lbs silent gorilla in the room is energy cost and a dollar not worth a sheet.

Fuel has driven the cost up for Hostess (raw goods and logistsics) to the point that they were hemmoriging money.

Yeah I was yelling at the guy on t.v. this morning 0 x 18500 is 0! Enjoy that pay!
HockeyDad Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Le HockeyDad is doing just fine. I was at a grocery store today and there were no Twinkies. I assume they are pulling them off the shelves due to the risk of the union members poisoning the product.
DrafterX Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,595
HockeyDad wrote:
Le HockeyDad is doing just fine. I was at a grocery store today and there were no Twinkies. I assume they are pulling them off the shelves due to the risk of the union members poisoning the product.



Scared
HockeyDad Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
ZRX1200 wrote:
I think there is some blame there but the 800lbs silent gorilla in the room is energy cost and a dollar not worth a sheet.

Fuel has driven the cost up for Hostess (raw goods and logistics) to the point that they were hemorrhaging money.



You will pay the price for energy and like it. The dollar is doing just fine. it is devaluing in line with most other currencies.
bloody spaniard Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Only zingers remain on the supermarket shelves.
What are fat people to do?


I still remember fondly the first tumor Hostess gave me.Sad
tailgater Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
sd72 wrote:
Here we go.....

Can anyone explain the 3.45 million the CEO got paid per year? I don't suppose the board of directors were making $35,000 a year either. Throw in a few Vice Presidents while your at it.

And yes I realize the CEO took a non pay for himself for a couple months to satisfy the unions a while ago.

Sometime I think you guys want everyone with no home, car, and insurance. Then you can say Romney would have done something for them. Closed a mysterious loophole or two.

Forget unions, what happened to "of the PEOPLE, by the PEOPLE, for the PEOPLE. "

Need to change it to, "whatever the corporations want, for whatever the fed can get from their PAC's, screw people. "

Ignorance runs rampant in you're posts, very telling of the posters.

What if the top 10 people at hostess took a 1% pay cut, cut their golden parachutes a touch, and put the company into surplus? Food for thought.


You're right.
I guess those "top 10 people" are the stupid ones.
They're giving up $Millions each year just to make a point.
They'd rather close the joint down then take a measley 1% decrease!!
They're closing the door just to spite the union. They're thowing away hundreds of millions, but man will they ever show that union!

sd is right!!


Or maybe he's not...
DrafterX Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,595
I just figured the CEOs were all old and ready to retire anyway...... prolly didn't have any kids to pass the business down too either... Mellow
tailgater Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
sd72 wrote:
It was only five thousand bakers who held out, but 18,500 lost their jobs due to the shutdown. If the news report on tv is accurate. So 5000 employees taking an eight percent cut on $33,000 equals?

$13,200,000.

What's the cost of pay, bonuses, retirement, and perks for the white collar employees?

Why does the guy making $33000 have to carry the costs of everything? Maybe we should all make min wage, that's $16000 a year! Gross. Not net.

If it was a non union company, they would just do it, and it wouldn't make the news. There'd be 5000 more people living at poverty level. Pretty soon we won't be able to buy the crap were importing from china.

After the majority of people get driven into the streets, and the corporations rule, like in the early 1900s, well have another wave of organizing. Just like then. And why? Because those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it. And apparently most here are of that sort.

Why is there never common ground? Corporate profits are at an average all time high, but that's not the workers business to worry about. Is it?


If it were a non-union company, they would just do it, and it wouldn't make the news.
And the company would be in business. And ALL the people would be getting paychecks.
You forgot to connect the dots, sd.

Corporate profits are at an average all time high.
Except, of course, the profits at Hostess. Where they closed the doors.

I hate when the damn facts get in the way of union logic.
tailgater Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
sd72 wrote:
Yes. ^ Just because I'm union, doesn't mean live or die by it. Ill be non union soon. Right to work is in the Michigan law machine as we speak.

Maybe my point has been missed as well, I'm not a wordsmith as some of you can be.

Common ground, equality, a company wanting their employees to prosper for the good of both. Not make me a billionaire as I watch you starve from business. Not pay me till it bleeds from employees. I think maybe this approach is about the only one that fits what this country is supposed to be about.

Call me naive.


What's a wordsmith?
HockeyDad Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
tailgater wrote:
What's a wordsmith?



They stick letters in fire, heat them up, and then hammer them out into words.
DrafterX Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,595
seems like a lot of work..... Mellow

are the deaf & dumb..?? Huh
bloody spaniard Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
What the hell are you talking about, sd72?
No really.Think
sd72 Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
You're all right. America's problems would be solved with Romney, and without unions.

That would solve the 80%ish of middle Americans through trickle down economics the republicans are still pushing since 1980. Dig up Reagan. He knew how to balance budgets.
HockeyDad Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
sd72 wrote:
You're all right. America's problems would be solved with Romney, and without unions.

That would solve the 80%ish of middle Americans through trickle down economics the republicans are still pushing since 1980. Dig up Reagan. He knew how to balance budgets.




You're totally off topic. Perhaps you should have a Twinkie to get your sugar count up a bit.
bloody spaniard Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Aaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, now we're talking, sd. You're a union man. Carrying the Twink's cause on your broad, hairy shoulders. Good for you.

Sorry I rarely read posts if they are longer than 2 sentences- unless they're my own.
tailgater Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
sd72 wrote:


Common ground, equality, a company wanting their employees to prosper for the good of both. Not make me a billionaire as I watch you starve from business. Not pay me till it bleeds from employees. I think maybe this approach is about the only one that fits what this country is supposed to be about.



Is that your impression of corporate America today?

For every company that behaves like this, I'll show you a company that DOES take care of their employees.
I know, because I worked for some. And now I sell to more than few.
Good people. Good companies.

Even in this instance. Look at the numbers. If the CEO of Hostess gave up a full year of pay, they'd still be closing the doors.




victor809 Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Honestly guys... what's the big deal?

If the factory closing is a "statement" that either side is making, then there still is a market demand for the product and someone else will buy the factory and begin to make a similar product, re-hiring whatever labor is necessary.

If the factory closing is because of a soft market for questionable cake-like substance, then there isn't much that could be done. No biggie.
teedubbya Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
to many twinkie makers not enough twinks.
DrafterX Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,595
Twinkies are too big to fail..!! Laugh
teedubbya Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
Twinkies are too big to fail..!! Laugh


Your autobiography should be entitled Drafter: King of the twinks.
bloody spaniard Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
victor809 wrote:
Honestly guys... what's the big deal?

If the factory closing is a "statement" that either side is making, then there still is a market demand for the product and someone else will buy the factory and begin to make a similar product, re-hiring whatever labor is necessary.

If the factory closing is because of a soft market for questionable cake-like substance, then there isn't much that could be done. No biggie.




My point exactly. Sad about the job loss but they may be rehired by a potential buyer or competitor.

I'm more concerned about Denny's pending 5% surcharge.
That makes my cholesterol lover's delite $5.99. Crying
sd72 Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
I am not hairy, by the way.
DrafterX Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,595
Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
he must go by Hank. sorry
tailgater Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
sd72 wrote:
I am not hairy, by the way.

LOL!
sd72 Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
And actually a supervisor, so shoulders not all that broad.
teedubbya Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
its the hips that matter


drafters hips dont lie
sd72 Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
How could they?
teedubbya Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
good question.

that would be sort of creepy
DrafterX Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,595

Get ‘em while you can.

The impending shutdown of Hostess Brands and its iconic snacks led to an online surge of would-be buyers seeking to get their hands on Twinkies before its too late.

As of midday Friday, nearly 900 items for sale on eBay were Twinkie-related, including single-size snacks, unsealed boxes and even lunchboxes, baseball cards and magnets. One seller in North Carolina even set a price of $5,000 for a single Twinkie.

“The news is out,” the listing reads. “Hostess Brands Inc. has filed for bankruptcy and has decided to end productions of their snack cakes. This is your opportunity to own a piece of history, a delicious piece at that. You are bidding on a single Twinkies that will be protectively packaged and shipped to the winning bidder.”

Sellers were also offering other Hostess icons, including a box of Ho Ho’s for $59.99, a Wonderbread golf ball for $5.99 and “one of the last boxes” of Hostess cupcakes for a whopping $100,000 despite their Nov. 27 expiration date.

Another seller in Texas is asking an eye-popping $250,000 for one box of 10 Twinkies.

“Item will be insured and picked up locally after payment in full,” the listing reads. “This is a great collectors [sic] item that can be passed down to family members and will only gain in value!”

Hostess Brands Inc., the maker of iconic childhood treats including Ding Dongs, Wonder Bread and Drakes, announced Friday it will wind down its operations after struggling to keep up with rising labor costs and the ever-changing tastes of Americans, who have grown accustomed to a dizzying array of new snacks flooding supermarket aisles every year.

The company, whose roster of brands date as far back as 1888, filed a motion to liquidate Friday with U.S. Bankruptcy Court after striking workers across the country crippled its ability to maintain production.

Hostess CEO Greg Rayburn said in an interview that there was no buyer waiting in the wings to rescue the company. But without giving details, he said that there has been interest in some of its 30 brands, which include Dolly Madison and Nature's Pride snacks. Experts agreed that it was likely the biggest brands would survive.


Film at 11...... Mellow
sd72 Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
There we go, problem solved.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<12345>