America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by DrafterX. 168 replies replies.
4 Pages1234>
Benghazi mania explained
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
victor809 Offline
#1 Posted: Tue, May 13 2014, 11:44 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
http://www.vox.com/2014/5/12/5700566/benghazi-prisoners-dilemma
ZRX1200 Offline
#2 Posted: Tue, May 13 2014, 10:25 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,661
http://www.examiner.com/article/libyan-intellegence-chief-assassinated-benghazi-what-did-he-know
Bitter Klinger Offline
#3 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 12:00 AM EST
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
victor809 wrote:
http://www.vox.com/2014/5/12/5700566/benghazi-prisoners-dilemma


Pffft.

If the bedwetting liberal author of your communist article who's name sounds like Sack Buttchamp had spent even a fraction of the time it took to slurp the progressive teat in boring us with his "work" on this "article", he could've maybe asked some relevant questions like:

Why is the liberal press covering up for a treasonous president?
Who specifically issued a stand down order to troops at the ready to help?
Who specifically created the ridiculous lie about a video?
Why isn't the Boy King being impeached for treason?
Why isn't Hitlary Rotten Clintax in jail for refusing to testify for nearly a year?
Why isn't Hitlary Rotten Clintax in jail for lying to congress through circumvention once she could stall no longer?
Why do liberals hate our country?

But questions are for journalists, and he doesn't qualify. Instead this dolt imposes upon us the idiotic notion that somehow its better to gain more attention & camapign donations by ignoring treasonous behavior from our nations highest offices? Screw that. And good luck with the certain-to-follow barrage of whining liberal media biotches over a subject they wish away. The American public wishes accountability, and its time to GET SOME.

Its high time these traitors were drug to a real hearing, and face real consequences. And there is plenty of rope to hang them for it, its just that nobody has had the balls to do anything with it yet.

Trey Gowdy for President.

Gene363 Offline
#4 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 12:03 AM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,870
Congressman Gowdy calls out the press for not doing their job getting answers about Benghazi.

http://youtu.be/cGFOGR3GAb0
victor809 Offline
#5 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 1:00 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I swear... trying to explain simple ideas to you guys is a waste of time.
ZRX1200 Offline
#6 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 1:18 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,661
We accept your apology.
TMCTLT Offline
#7 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 6:25 AM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
victor809 wrote:
I swear... trying to explain simple ideas to you guys is a waste of time.



Why don't you go find another place to spew your wretched belief system then, I hate to see you waste your precious time.

Simple ideas come from......


Simple Minds......that's right Applause
TMCTLT Offline
#8 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 6:25 AM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Bitter Klinger wrote:
Pffft.

If the bedwetting liberal author of your communist article who's name sounds like Sack Buttchamp had spent even a fraction of the time it took to slurp the progressive teat in boring us with his "work" on this "article", he could've maybe asked some relevant questions like:

Why is the liberal press covering up for a treasonous president?
Who specifically issued a stand down order to troops at the ready to help?
Who specifically created the ridiculous lie about a video?
Why isn't the Boy King being impeached for treason?
Why isn't Hitlary Rotten Clintax in jail for refusing to testify for nearly a year?
Why isn't Hitlary Rotten Clintax in jail for lying to congress through circumvention once she could stall no longer?
Why do liberals hate our country?

But questions are for journalists, and he doesn't qualify. Instead this dolt imposes upon us the idiotic notion that somehow its better to gain more attention & camapign donations by ignoring treasonous behavior from our nations highest offices? Screw that. And good luck with the certain-to-follow barrage of whining liberal media biotches over a subject they wish away. The American public wishes accountability, and its time to GET SOME.

Its high time these traitors were drug to a real hearing, and face real consequences. And there is plenty of rope to hang them for it, its just that nobody has had the balls to do anything with it yet.

Trey Gowdy for President.




Applause Applause Applause
Burner02 Offline
#9 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 6:53 AM EST
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Bitter Klinger wrote:
Pffft.

If the bedwetting liberal author of your communist article who's name sounds like Sack Buttchamp had spent even a fraction of the time it took to slurp the progressive teat in boring us with his "work" on this "article", he could've maybe asked some relevant questions like:

Why is the liberal press covering up for a treasonous president?
Who specifically issued a stand down order to troops at the ready to help?
Who specifically created the ridiculous lie about a video?
Why isn't the Boy King being impeached for treason?
Why isn't Hitlary Rotten Clintax in jail for refusing to testify for nearly a year?
Why isn't Hitlary Rotten Clintax in jail for lying to congress through circumvention once she could stall no longer?
Why do liberals hate our country?

But questions are for journalists, and he doesn't qualify. Instead this dolt imposes upon us the idiotic notion that somehow its better to gain more attention & camapign donations by ignoring treasonous behavior from our nations highest offices? Screw that. And good luck with the certain-to-follow barrage of whining liberal media biotches over a subject they wish away. The American public wishes accountability, and its time to GET SOME.

Its high time these traitors were drug to a real hearing, and face real consequences. And there is plenty of rope to hang them for it, its just that nobody has had the balls to do anything with it yet.

Trey Gowdy for President.





And why have we not gone after the terrorist that carried out the attack, I mean protest?


ram27bat
Gene363 Offline
#10 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 11:05 AM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,870
victor809 wrote:
I swear... trying to explain simple ideas to you guys is a waste of time.


Yup, tough sliding when people have access to facts and apply critical thinking.
victor809 Offline
#11 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 11:15 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Gene363 wrote:

Yup, tough sliding when people have access to facts and apply critical thinking.


Yeah... I'm sure you personally have better access to facts than any of the dozens of convened hearings.

Did you even bother to read the article?

If you stop and even for a moment consider the idea that this is nothing more than a political charade, the game theory fits their actions to a tee. Makes even more sense when you consider the idea that these are politicians, who are by nature more motivated by ensuring their personal gains are maximized.
victor809 Offline
#12 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 11:17 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Bitter Klinger wrote:
Pffft.

If the bedwetting liberal author of your communist article who's name sounds like Sack Buttchamp had spent even a fraction of the time it took to slurp the progressive teat in boring us with his "work" on this "article", he could've maybe asked some relevant questions like:

blah blah blah....




I've yet to see a post of yours worthwhile. You just spew the same stuff over and over. Instead of discussing whether or not game theory is applicable in this situation, you're just going off on the same boring talking points you got from some birther site.
gryphonms Offline
#13 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 11:36 AM EST
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Why bother with facts, they just get I'm the way.
Sarcasm
Gene363 Offline
#14 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 12:19 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,870
victor809 wrote:
Yeah... I'm sure you personally have better access to facts than any of the dozens of convened hearings.

Did you even bother to read the article?

If you stop and even for a moment consider the idea that this is nothing more than a political charade, the game theory fits their actions to a tee. Makes even more sense when you consider the idea that these are politicians, who are by nature more motivated by ensuring their personal gains are maximized.



Did you listen to Trey Gaudy? Can you answer his questions factually and in detail?

The article is spin to draw away attention from failures on the part of the current administration, the same thing the democrats have been doing all along.

It also includes wild assumptions, aka BS, e.g., "It stands to reason that at least some of those Republicans don't actually believe that the Obama administration is hiding the truth about their handling of the attack on the US mission in Benghazi in 2012."

The only way to resolve "the prisoner's dilemma" honestly would be for the democrats and Hillary to provide honest answers.


Benghazi is either a coverup of illegal activities, e.g., gun running or an example of total incompetence on the part of the current administration. So yes, the questions will continue to haunt the democrats and especially Hillary Clinton.
victor809 Offline
#15 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 12:47 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Gene363 wrote:


The only way to resolve "the prisoner's dilemma" honestly would be for the democrats and Hillary to provide honest answers.


That sounds eerily familiar. It sounds like every birther constantly saying "why doesn't Obama prove he's a citizen by showing his birth certificate". You saw what happened then, right? They don't accept it as real.

For all you know, Hillary IS providing honest answers, you just don't accept them as such.
DrafterX Offline
#16 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 12:49 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
I wonder if she's had anyone whacked lately... Think Think
victor809 Offline
#17 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 12:57 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
I wonder if she's had anyone whacked lately... Think Think


I'm sure you've got an email on the topic somewhere....
DrafterX Offline
#18 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 1:03 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html

ThumpUp
victor809 Offline
#19 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 1:10 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html

ThumpUp


Sh$t drafter... the most recent one on that list is 2000.... That was 14 years ago! How can I trust a politician who hasn't had at least ONE person offed in the past 5 years?
DrafterX Offline
#20 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 1:17 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
I heard they whacked Casey Kasem... Mellow
Gene363 Offline
#21 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 1:30 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,870
victor809 wrote:
That sounds eerily familiar. It sounds like every birther constantly saying "why doesn't Obama prove he's a citizen by showing his birth certificate". You saw what happened then, right? They don't accept it as real.

For all you know, Hillary IS providing honest answers, you just don't accept them as such.


Uhm, "What difference does it make?" is not an answer to anything and just to be fair, it would not have been an adequate answer to the Iran Contra controversy.
Buckwheat Offline
#22 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 1:31 PM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Bitter Klinger wrote:
Pffft.

If the bedwetting liberal author of your communist article who's name sounds like Sack Buttchamp had spent even a fraction of the time it took to slurp the progressive teat in boring us with his "work" on this "article", he could've maybe asked some relevant questions like:

Why is the liberal press covering up for a treasonous president?
Who specifically issued a stand down order to troops at the ready to help?
Who specifically created the ridiculous lie about a video?
Why isn't the Boy King being impeached for treason?
Why isn't Hitlary Rotten Clintax in jail for refusing to testify for nearly a year?
Why isn't Hitlary Rotten Clintax in jail for lying to congress through circumvention once she could stall no longer?
Why do liberals hate our country?

But questions are for journalists, and he doesn't qualify. Instead this dolt imposes upon us the idiotic notion that somehow its better to gain more attention & camapign donations by ignoring treasonous behavior from our nations highest offices? Screw that. And good luck with the certain-to-follow barrage of whining liberal media biotches over a subject they wish away. The American public wishes accountability, and its time to GET SOME.

Its high time these traitors were drug to a real hearing, and face real consequences. And there is plenty of rope to hang them for it, its just that nobody has had the balls to do anything with it yet.

Trey Gowdy for President.



So how do you really feel about this?
Gene363 Offline
#23 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 1:32 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,870
victor809 wrote:
Sh$t drafter... the most recent one on that list is 2000.... That was 14 years ago! How can I trust a politician who hasn't had at least ONE person offed in the past 5 years?


Just one is important now: Vincent Foster
jetblasted Offline
#24 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 4:46 PM EST
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
Hillary was summoned many times to testify, but she was conveinently sent to Peru, Mongolia, Namibia, etc, etc . . . Now that Kerry is summoned to testify before the committee, he's been sent to Mexico . . . See a pattern here, anyone ?
teedubbya Offline
#25 Posted: Wed, May 14 2014, 5:07 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
jetblasted wrote:
Hillary was summoned many times to testify, but she was conveinently sent to Peru, Mongolia, Namibia, etc, etc . . . Now that Kerry is summoned to testify before the committee, he's been sent to Mexico . . . See a pattern here, anyone ?


Yea. Normally that position doesn't travel much.

Pattern? They are both brain injured?
tailgater Offline
#26 Posted: Thu, May 15 2014, 11:29 AM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:


For all you know, Hillary IS providing honest answers, you just don't accept them as such.


This question implies that you don't believe her either.
Buckwheat Offline
#27 Posted: Thu, May 15 2014, 11:35 AM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
tailgater wrote:
This question implies that you don't believe her either.


Or is he infering? Beer
teedubbya Offline
#28 Posted: Thu, May 15 2014, 3:28 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Y'all are smartical.
victor809 Offline
#29 Posted: Thu, May 15 2014, 3:54 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
This question implies that you don't believe her either.


No... the question implies that if you ask someone a question which you don't have any ability to refute or question their answer, you may as well accept it.

Let's try it out.

You can ask me how many women I've had sex with. I can give you an answer. If you don't believe that answer, what are you going to do? Ask me a second time? I'll probably give you the same answer. Ask me a third time? Same answer. And so on and so forth. The fact that this charade continues on, with no one really expecting different answers clearly speaks to how much of a meaningless game it is (except to the people who are duped into thinking that the 50th time we're sure to a different result).

At this point I don't think anyone even knows what they're trying to investigate.
Bitter Klinger Offline
#30 Posted: Thu, May 15 2014, 11:06 PM EST
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
SO, you don't want to discuss the "article" content itself, you just wanted us to consider the idea that this is nothing more than a political charade? Well then, why didn't you state that before posting the link, ya dipshizz? Just slapping the link up by itself leads to reason that you somehow found merit and worthiness in its content - agreement even. Lets face it, you've managed to label yourself quite the proud libbie around here, so why would we think differently?


Quote:

If you stop and even for a moment consider the idea that this is nothing more than a political charade, the game theory fits their actions to a tee. Makes even more sense when you consider the idea that these are politicians, who are by nature more motivated by ensuring their personal gains are maximized.


That's pure damage control - I might have believed that was your only motive for posting the link if you hadn't then proceeded to launch an all-out defensive with everyone in the thread, including the guys that were just making light:


The faked birth certificate - Goshdam, you'd have be f'ing BLIND to ignore the plethora of screw-ups on that one.
They screwed up every single item on it like 3rd graders trying to make afake ID.


Maybe Hillary is telling the truth - Ha! Since WHEN? The last truth out of her trap was "put your d!ck back in your pants,
Bill. You can't f-ck her here!"


Multitude of deaths surrounding the Clintons - Everyone with an email address likely has that one. Is all information
conveyed via email now considered conspiratorial drivel, devoid of any
validity?

Of course your link was spin. Why discuss it as a possibility? Should we also discuss the possibility a full house over a pair? Here's some more on this subject that need no discussion:

The Bhengazi video lie.
The Bhengazi hangar ceremony.
The liberal media contention that we are "tired of hearing about Bhengazi".(your links tired theme)
The Hitlary and BO public lovey-dovey TV spot after her "stepping down" as Secretary, right after her "testimony".

You can't have it both ways. Don't complain that our assertions are off base when the article content dovetails perfectly with your own apparant leanings. And if my posts are so unworthy, you do have the option of not reading them, not replying to them, or both. Or you could just go shave your beaver.
Bitter Klinger Offline
#31 Posted: Thu, May 15 2014, 11:13 PM EST
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
victor809 wrote:
No... the question implies that if you ask someone a question which you don't have any ability to refute or question their answer, you may as well accept it.

Let's try it out.

You can ask me how many women I've had sex with. I can give you an answer. If you don't believe that answer, what are you going to do? Ask me a second time? I'll probably give you the same answer. Ask me a third time? Same answer. And so on and so forth. The fact that this charade continues on, with no one really expecting different answers clearly speaks to how much of a meaningless game it is (except to the people who are duped into thinking that the 50th time we're sure to a different result).

At this point I don't think anyone even knows what they're trying to investigate.


Bullchit.

So, hypothetically if you lie about having hetrosexual sex 50 times, but we know you to be a homosexual, your continued lies become fact?

We won't accept the lies as truth. Not now, not ever. This isn't going away, no matter how hard they lie, no matter how many times they lie. No matter if they cry foul, complain about the amount of time elapsed since their lie began or their refusal to sit on a committee to investigate the lies and their origins.
Bitter Klinger Offline
#32 Posted: Thu, May 15 2014, 11:21 PM EST
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
jetblasted wrote:
Hillary was summoned many times to testify, but she was conveinently sent to Peru, Mongolia, Namibia, etc, etc . . . Now that Kerry is summoned to testify before the committee, he's been sent to Mexico . . . See a pattern here, anyone ?


Pattern for sure, hell - its the liberal modus operandi for everything they get busted on now.

However, wasting time dragging Lurch in will be a fruitless. They need to drag BO and Hitlary AND Rice to the table, side-by-side, see if they all stammer in unison.
rfenst Offline
#33 Posted: Thu, May 15 2014, 11:38 PM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,431
victor809 wrote:
I swear... trying to explain simple ideas to you guys is a waste of time.


Game theory is just too complex for some.
Buckwheat Offline
#34 Posted: Fri, May 16 2014, 7:58 AM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
teedubbya wrote:
Y'all are smartical.


I'm smart enough to know that I'm not that smart.
victor809 Offline
#35 Posted: Fri, May 16 2014, 10:56 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Bitter Klinger wrote:
Bullchit.

So, hypothetically if you lie about having hetrosexual sex 50 times, but we know you to be a homosexual, your continued lies become fact?

We won't accept the lies as truth. Not now, not ever. This isn't going away, no matter how hard they lie, no matter how many times they lie. No matter if they cry foul, complain about the amount of time elapsed since their lie began or their refusal to sit on a committee to investigate the lies and their origins.



You consistently fail to understand the simplest points. Bottom line, you don't know its a lie. Your convictions that it's a lie are not based on any facts or knowledge, but on some flimsy belief. If there were actual evidence, it would have been brought to light in any of the 50+ hearings they have wasted money on.

I have never even stated whether I believe she is lying or telling the truth. Because it doesn't matter. If there is no evidence to support my "belief" either way, why bother having one? Only an idiot plants his flag in shifting sand. Why would I form a strong belief without any evidence?

Oh, and cute attempt at trying to call me gay. Who I choose to stick my d%ck in isn't really any of your business, unless you're trying to get me to stick it in you.
victor809 Offline
#36 Posted: Fri, May 16 2014, 11:54 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
rfenst wrote:
Game theory is just too complex for some.


Honestly rfenst, I think tic tac toe is too complex for some of the individuals here.
victor809 Offline
#37 Posted: Fri, May 16 2014, 11:58 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Bitter Klinger wrote:
And if my posts are so unworthy, you do have the option of not reading them, not replying to them, or both. Or you could just go shave your beaver.


I read your posts because even in real life I get shocked by the lack of critical thinking skills people portray. Reading it on an anonymous discount internet cigar forum is like a "stupidity vaccine"... your posts are the equivalent of a dead stupidity virus... it won't damage my career and/or social life by calling you on your stupidity.
Buckwheat Offline
#38 Posted: Fri, May 16 2014, 12:07 PM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Bitter Klinger wrote:

We won't accept the lies as truth. Not now, not ever. This isn't going away, no matter how hard they lie, no matter how many times they lie. No matter if they cry foul, complain about the amount of time elapsed since their lie began or their refusal to sit on a committee to investigate the lies and their origins.


Most of the time the winners get to write the history, and the Democrats have been winning most of the big elections lately. Doesn't make it right but when has that mattered lately.
gryphonms Offline
#39 Posted: Fri, May 16 2014, 12:39 PM EST
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
horse

Thought we needed a new dead horse to beat. Nothing further will be learned about this no matter how many additional enquiries there are. At this point it is not about the truth, which we will never know. It is about political gains and losses.
DrafterX Offline
#40 Posted: Fri, May 16 2014, 2:37 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
People died...
Obama lied... Mellow
HockeyDad Offline
#41 Posted: Fri, May 16 2014, 3:13 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,192
We make more people. We'll find another person to take the ambassador to Libya job.
ZRX1200 Offline
#42 Posted: Fri, May 16 2014, 3:14 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,661
And run guns
HockeyDad Offline
#43 Posted: Fri, May 16 2014, 3:15 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,192
The USA has been running guns since its inception.
victor809 Offline
#44 Posted: Fri, May 16 2014, 3:16 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I hope we didn't lose any inventory in the Benghazi attacks. Then we'd really have to try to get to the bottom of this.... not this whole fake trying to get to the bottom of it.
Bitter Klinger Offline
#45 Posted: Fri, May 16 2014, 8:42 PM EST
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
Every time someone disagrees with you or your liberal drivel, you deflect calling them stupid. Every single time. Its boring, frankly.

My hypothetical point had nothing to do with where/what or whom you schtup, but with pointing out that repeated lies do not equal the truth. For someone who constantly throws stones at others intellects, I find your inability to understand that quite humorous.

Further, I knew if I used that verbage to make my point, you fall for it and get all anxious about your sexuality.

You're still my favorite slinky, buddy! Flapper
victor809 Offline
#46 Posted: Sat, May 17 2014, 11:20 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Bitter Klinger wrote:
Every time someone disagrees with you or your liberal drivel, you deflect calling them stupid. Every single time. Its boring, frankly.

My hypothetical point had nothing to do with where/what or whom you schtup, but with pointing out that repeated lies do not equal the truth. For someone who constantly throws stones at others intellects, I find your inability to understand that quite humorous.

Further, I knew if I used that verbage to make my point, you fall for it and get all anxious about your sexuality.

You're still my favorite slinky, buddy! Flapper


And every time someone has an idea in some way different from you, you call them liberal. I've watched you call people with consistently conservative ideas "libtards" on here. You aren't smart enough to understand nuances.

As for your hypothetical point... You missed it completely. I never said that it became the "truth". I stated that without any additional information, you have no choice but to accept it as such (learn the difference). To kick and scream and keep asking the same questions over again of the same individuals you refuse to believe is completely inane.

As for my sexuality, you do realize I have no anxiety about it at all, right? I leave anxieties to people with smaller minds like yourself.
Bitter Klinger Offline
#47 Posted: Sun, May 18 2014, 10:32 AM EST
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
You're Wrong again Vickie,

The "libtard" I once referred to was not Tailgater, it was YOU. But even then you replied about that because you're too blind to see when you've been smacked.

And No, because someone repeatedly lies, whether it can be proven at that nanosecond or not, does not force anyone to accept the lies as fact. Nice try on that one.

And there you go crying again after getting smacked AGAIN, calling me stupid.You just proved what I said above, Victor. Don't you see that? Stop digging when you're in a hole.

And yes, every single time I see liberal drivel, I will call it out. Every time. Liberal spin isn't just a different opinion, its a cancer. And anyone spreading it is a disease that if left ignored will spread further - eventually causing the death of all that is good in the world. So post away, but unless I choose not to read it, or just miss it, I'm gonna call it out.

So there it is. You can either cut the crap, or I'll keep pushing you down the stairs. And I honestly enjoy the latter, so do whatever works for you, buddy...
victor809 Offline
#48 Posted: Sun, May 18 2014, 1:45 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Hey short bus.
https://www.cigarbid.com...Sterling-situation.aspx
Read post 20 and tell my you were calling ME a libtard again. You quoted tail and responded directly to him.

You aren't even smart enough to know who you're even talking to, or what you have typed yourself...

This is the problem with you... There appears to be some fantasy land you're living in, where the sentences you're typing are somehow decisive arguments. You haven't made a single point, you aren't "pushing anyone down the stairs"... I doubt your arguments have enough weight to cause you to even fall down the stairs yourself.

Now... For a fun mental exercise (I know, why bother with someone who's proven time and time again they don't have the mental strength to understand simple concepts). If someone lies to you, and you have zero poof they are lying, and no way of knowing the truth at all.... How do you know they are lying? I'm not telling you to accept lies you moron... I'm telling you to accept that you don't know if they are lies or the truth and you will never be given the information to make that decision. Your claim that they are lies isn't based on any facts... If there were facts we wouldn't be sitting through the 100th hearing. But no... You want to ask the same people the same questions over and over again, and when you get the same answer you want to scream " they're lying!". You're a tool. The politicians are using you like a wind up toy.
Bitter Klinger Offline
#49 Posted: Sun, May 18 2014, 4:00 PM EST
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877

Short Bus! HAaaahhh! That is SO FUNNY!

Victor, you're a libtard. You can quote that - Post #49 in this thread says Victor's a libtard. There ya go - better now?

If there were no shred of evidence, they wouldn't be pressing for more hearings. You and those you support just want it believed that there isn't but there most certainly is. Try reading instead of attempting to prove to those who don't like you how smart you are. Here's a newsflash for ya buddy, you aren't very smart. If you were, you'd know there is new evidence that is quite damning, and every day, there is more on that topic as well as others.

No one uses me for anything. I support those who support our country as it was founded, not those who look to fundamentally change it as you do.

Now, looks like it time for me to go smoke a good one, and for you to go shave your beaver again.

Flapper C'ya Vickie! Flapper
victor809 Offline
#50 Posted: Mon, May 19 2014, 3:30 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Bitter Klinger wrote:
Short Bus! HAaaahhh! That is SO FUNNY!

Victor, you're a libtard. You can quote that - Post #49 in this thread says Victor's a libtard. There ya go - better now?



Amelia...
Seriously? You think I care what you call me? You call conservative people in this forum "libtards" because they don't agree with you on a single point. That means you have very poor critical thinking skills as well as a very narrow view of the many possible variations in life.

Quote:

If there were no shred of evidence, they wouldn't be pressing for more hearings. You and those you support just want it believed that there isn't but there most certainly is.

Yeah... sure. The idea of a politician pressing for more hearings simply to grandstand and try to score political points is simply unheard of. Seriously... your idea of logic is that "they're pressing for more hearings, so there MUST be evidence"? That's... well... that's just plain retarded. To have that point of view, you must 1 - trust your politicians to not lie to you... and 2 - believe they have evidence which they aren't going to immediately leak for political points, but will instead sit on and not tell anyone about until they get to the 50th or 60th hearing... because that makes sense. You're such a tool....

Quote:

Try reading instead of attempting to prove to those who don't like you how smart you are. Here's a newsflash for ya buddy, you aren't very smart. If you were, you'd know there is new evidence that is quite damning, and every day, there is more on that topic as well as others.

Yeah.... new evidence. Right. When real evidence comes out, I'm not going to have to go look for it. It's going to make it to every network and will be posted on cbid about 20 different times. Anything out there right now is not "evidence"... its speculation. If you don't know the difference, then an entire conversation isn't even worth having with you.

Quote:

No one uses me for anything. I support those who support our country as it was founded, not those who look to fundamentally change it as you do.

Now, looks like it time for me to go smoke a good one, and for you to go shave your beaver again.

Flapper C'ya Vickie! Flapper

Yeah right Amelia... you're getting used. You're being jerked right and left and up and down like a little marionette. The funny part is, you don't even see how obvious it is.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages1234>
Back to Top