All fun aside, does anyone here truly believe the people at the helm were paying any attention to what was going on? And once the attack happened, does anyone on here honestly believe one word of a video causing a protest? Can you not call a spade a spade without a COA? Who's the "tool" if you refuse to accept the truth because the players won't fall on their own swords? Thats why we have courts. The guilty rarely fess up until forced, and sometimes they never do.
2 days prior to the attack, Obama proclaimed "Al Queda is dead and GM is alive". What a crock.
http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/benghazi-the-biggest-cover-up-scandal-in-u-s-history-was-benghazi-a-cia-gun-running-operation-for-muslim-brotherhood-other-insurgents-fighting-in-syria/
We're all being lied to, and because the liars won't admit it, it doesn't put them in the clear, nor must we accept their lies as the truth as some here insist upon. It puts them squarely and rightfully in the crosshairs of an upcoming and long overdue congressional hearing. Not to be confused with an internal investigation of themselves, as they did. They have sanitized "talking points" that were passed around immediately following the attack. They redacted so much of the reports and emails that much is illegible - but not all. Thats not national security, its a cover-up. It takes time to sift through what's left, but they're doing it. And like it or don't they have found more evidence.
We're being lied to about who knew what and when partly because of the gun running, but mostly because it was politically damning to tell the truth - because BO stood to lose an election. And thats treason. And if you pretend this is unimportant or unworthy of investigation because your chosen political candidate would be harmed, you're far worse than a tool.
