TMCTLT wrote:What's the matter Vicki....couldn't get TBG to bite on your need for an argument??? You're no less a sh*t stirrer but I must hand it to you both for " sticking together like glue " Your arguing over numbers you like to support your arguing points....I know...I know....you like your #ssss ( and your buddy Toni )
Huh... You respond without answering a question.
When tbg pops up again I'll ask him the question again.
You dove into this thread to argue with me. Answer the simple question... What are WE arguing about? Tell me what stance I have taken that you disagree with, and point out where I've taken that stance.
And answer the second question.. Defend why you think it's OK to make a 100% incorrect statement as long as you are arguing with a "name calling sh$t stirrer"... A collarary to that would be, given what statements you've made about me, banderl and others, why would we believe a single thing you post if you think it's acceptable to use 100% incorrect information to argue with someone you think is a sh$t stirrer. Hell, are you lying to me in your answer to this question as well?