America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 7 years ago by Speyside. 204 replies replies.
5 Pages<12345>
Massachusetts passes transgender law.
Brewha Offline
#151 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
teedubbya wrote:
I heard drafter volunteered to be the deke checker in the mens bathroom.... no deke and he will send you out

LOL
DrafterX Offline
#152 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Brewha wrote:

And btw, I know a white guy who decided to be black.
Just sayin'




The watermelon man..?? Huh
Brewha Offline
#153 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
DrafterX wrote:
The watermelon man..?? Huh

No - he changed his name to Mo Monet...
teedubbya Offline
#154 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Vanilla ice?


I think sexual orientation is protected along with race etc. agree with it or not, I think it just is at this time.
teedubbya Offline
#155 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
so now we are going to have deke checkers at every men's bathroom.... and being irish this is discriminating against me
DrafterX Offline
#156 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
I think they are needed more at the Lady's room... Mellow
gummy jones Offline
#157 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
Brewha wrote:
Someone is ALWAYS offended. But people still have a right to the bathroom.

And btw, I know a white guy who decided to be black.
Just sayin'


i wasnt aware the transgenders were forced to hold it
if you hold it in it can give you a tummy ache ya know
teedubbya Offline
#158 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
I think they are needed more at the Lady's room... Mellow



why? so now it only applies to boys wanting to be girls not girls wanting to be boys?
DrafterX Offline
#159 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
I think that's where the problem is... guys don't care who piss around them... they care about who's pissing around their wife and daughters... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#160 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
gummy jones wrote:
i wasnt aware the transgenders were forced to hold it
if you hold it in it can give you a tummy ache ya know



they are striking.. if they can't go where they want they're not gonna go at all.... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#161 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
so its just half the transgenders that are the issue
DrafterX Offline
#162 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
ya.. the bad ones... Mellow


but I'm prolly not your best source for info... the only things I know about the transgesters is what i learned from the threads in here... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#163 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
there are transgenders in here?
DrafterX Offline
#164 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
You met Victor... don't cover for him.. Not talking
teedubbya Offline
#165 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Come to think of it I never saw his deke. Youd better check it out.
tonygraz Offline
#166 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,284
Drafter saw his boobs.
Brewha Offline
#167 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
tonygraz wrote:
Drafter saw his boobs.

OhMyGod
victor809 Offline
#168 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
That's MOOBS, thank you very much.
Brewha Offline
#169 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Victor, I think it is best if we stop referring to you as a liberal. At least until your gender issues are resolved.

I mean, we have a rep to protect....
DrafterX Offline
#170 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Victor's a liberal..?? since when..?? Huh
tonygraz Offline
#171 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,284
Hey, what about diversity ?
Brewha Offline
#172 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
DrafterX wrote:
Victor's a liberal..?? since when..?? Huh

Let's keep that our little secret for now.....
DrafterX Offline
#173 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Does he know..?? Huh
victor809 Offline
#174 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I was gonna be a conservative, but then TCBY was a d#ck to the sweet transvestites from transexual transylvania.

I can't abide by that.
Brewha Offline
#175 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Closet liberal......

Speak to the hand
Brewha Offline
#176 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Victor, we embrace your diversity.





I think.....
banderl Offline
#177 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
victor809 wrote:
I was gonna be a conservative, but then TCBY was a d#ck to the sweet transvestites from transexual transylvania.

I can't abide by that.



That's because he was too tranny for them.
victor809 Offline
#178 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Brewha wrote:
So to you transgender people are a clear and present danger of acting illegally? If they want a sex change, it mean they want to rape or molest?


No. And that's exactly my point. The argument from the left against guns is that having them present and easily available makes it more likely that a person will perform an act which is already illegal.
The argument from the right against transsexuals in the bathroom is that having the bathrooms easily available to them makes it more likely that a person will perform an act which is already illegal.

Both the right and the left use the exact same argument AGAINST their personal pet peev. And both the right and the left use the exact same argument against the restriction.

I think it's hilarious (in the sort of, look at these idiots in the zoo sort of way) that neither group can understand the weakness in their own argument, but can clearly see it when it's the other side's pet argument.
victor809 Offline
#179 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Brew....

Embrace my diversity... Yeah that's the thing.... Embrace it a little lower... Yeah... Right there.
Brewha Offline
#180 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
victor809 wrote:
No. And that's exactly my point. The argument from the left against guns is that having them present and easily available makes it more likely that a person will perform an act which is already illegal.
The argument from the right against transsexuals in the bathroom is that having the bathrooms easily available to them makes it more likely that a person will perform an act which is already illegal.

Both the right and the left use the exact same argument AGAINST their personal pet peev. And both the right and the left use the exact same argument against the restriction.

I think it's hilarious (in the sort of, look at these idiots in the zoo sort of way) that neither group can understand the weakness in their own argument, but can clearly see it when it's the other side's pet argument.

The needle on my BS indicator is slapping back and forth....

Since all people have a gender identity we would all be equity dangerious of a sex crime. Even if we changed our gender.

But only gun owners could shoot some one.
Brewha Offline
#181 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
victor809 wrote:
Brew....

Embrace my diversity... Yeah that's the thing.... Embrace it a little lower... Yeah... Right there.

LOL

I didn't know you went through with the surgery.....


Sorry but, I'm spoke for....
victor809 Offline
#182 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Brewha wrote:
The needle on my BS indicator is slapping back and forth....

Since all people have a gender identity we would all be equity dangerious of a sex crime. Even if we changed our gender.

But only gun owners could shoot some one.



Yeah. But why focus on the "shooting". I'm pretty sure there isn't a law against "shooting" someone. If it didn't have the negative effect of killing or harming a person, no one would care if you shot someone. It is illegal to kill someone. Guns just make it easier, not more illegal (except in states where they decide that it's extra illegal to shoot someone, moreso than blowing them up, or poisoning them, or stabbing them, or f'ing them to death).

And distilled to a core, YES we are all dangerous of a sex crime, which is why it's hilarious to me that people think the bathrooms are some sort of sacred place where all the sex criminals want to get into to do the sex crimes. Again, my point is that both sides are bumbling idiots and their arguments are ridiculous. My humor is that both side fervently believe in the validity of their pet argument.
Brewha Offline
#183 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
victor809 wrote:
Yeah. But why focus on the "shooting". I'm pretty sure there isn't a law against "shooting" someone. If it didn't have the negative effect of killing or harming a person, no one would care if you shot someone. It is illegal to kill someone. Guns just make it easier, not more illegal (except in states where they decide that it's extra illegal to shoot someone, moreso than blowing them up, or poisoning them, or stabbing them, or f'ing them to death).

And distilled to a core, YES we are all dangerous of a sex crime, which is why it's hilarious to me that people think the bathrooms are some sort of sacred place where all the sex criminals want to get into to do the sex crimes. Again, my point is that both sides are bumbling idiots and their arguments are ridiculous. My humor is that both side fervently believe in the validity of their pet argument.

Uh, no Victor. Shooting someone is called assault. As in a crime....
Now someone may fail to press charges, or decide not to press charges in the event that the bullet was thereputic - (sure, that happens) or even an honest accident. But ask a DA - it's pretty much a crime by default. Including negligence.

Sex on the other hand is much more rarely a crime. Someone must take issue with the act.

To put it in perspective, look at the number of times people having sex becomes a crime vs. the number of time people getting shot does....
teedubbya Offline
#184 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Brewha has a butt stuff indicator that he slaps back and forth? Freak.
tonygraz Offline
#185 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,284
victor809 wrote:
No. And that's exactly my point. The argument from the left against guns is that having them present and easily available makes it more likely that a person will perform an act which is already illegal.
The argument from the right against transsexuals in the bathroom is that having the bathrooms easily available to them makes it more likely that a person will perform an act which is already illegal.

Both the right and the left use the exact same argument AGAINST their personal pet peev. And both the right and the left use the exact same argument against the restriction.

I think it's hilarious (in the sort of, look at these idiots in the zoo sort of way) that neither group can understand the weakness in their own argument, but can clearly see it when it's the other side's pet argument.


I think there are a lot more guns out there than there are transgenders.
tonygraz Offline
#186 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,284
teedubbya wrote:
Brewha has a butt stuff indicator that he slaps back and forth? Freak.


Drafter is pissed - he said you sold him the only prototype.
DrafterX Offline
#187 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
to summarize...
no issue with females wanting to be guys..
yes issue with males wanting to be females..
yes issue with this going on in public schools...
no issue with this going down on Bourbon Street..
yes issue with shooting a transgender in public schools..
yes issue with transgenders shooting people on Bourbon Street...
Mellow
tonygraz Offline
#188 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,284
Did you have to bring guns into this discussion - are you trying for a 500 ?
teedubbya Offline
#189 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Well it is a parallel issue. The chicks want guns the dudes want their guns removed.
SmokeMonkey Offline
#190 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
DrafterX wrote:
to summarize...
no issue with females wanting to be guys..
yes issue with males wanting to be females..
yes issue with this going on in public schools...
no issue with this going down on Bourbon Street..
yes issue with shooting a transgender in public schools..
yes issue with transgenders shooting people on Bourbon Street...
Mellow


So the transgenders would be busted down on Bourbon Street
Set up, like a bowling pin
Knocked down, it gets to wearing thin
They just won't let you be?
DrafterX Offline
#191 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
somethin like that... there aren't any around here in Oklahoma tho... Mellow
gummy jones Offline
#192 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
keep in mind that no amount of physical mutilation or daydreaming/wishful thinking changes someones chromosomes
frankj1 Offline
#193 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
if only it was a whim...
TMCTLT Offline
#194 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Brewha wrote:
Your suggesting people have a right to not be exposed to others that they find offensive.....

So bring back the "whites only" fountains?




Your pathetic....in your characterizations and comparisons
TMCTLT Offline
#195 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
victor809 wrote:
I was gonna be a conservative, but then TCBY was a d#ck to the sweet transvestites from transexual transylvania.

I can't abide by that.




I can't help it....I didn't fall very far from the D*ck tree....Anxious



quote=banderl]That's because he was too tranny for them.[/quote]



And your over there " rubbin one out " just thinking about it.....kiss kiss
teedubbya Offline
#196 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
TMCTLT wrote:
I can't help it....I didn't fall very far from the ****** tree....



your folks were transgendered?
TMCTLT Offline
#197 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
victor809 wrote:
No. And that's exactly my point. The argument from the left against guns is that having them present and easily available makes it more likely that a person will perform an act which is already illegal.
The argument from the right against transsexuals in the bathroom is that having the bathrooms easily available to them makes it more likely that a person will perform an act which is already illegal.

Both the right and the left use the exact same argument AGAINST their personal pet peev. And both the right and the left use the exact same argument against the restriction.

I think it's hilarious (in the sort of, look at these idiots in the zoo sort of way) that neither group can understand the weakness in their own argument, but can clearly see it when it's the other side's pet argument.



Poor comparison Victor....bathroom availability for them already exists.....they NOW want in the ladies room, that's putting OTHERS unnecessarily in harms way IMHO

If it were left to the true gun control zealots.....they would be removed from Earth completely... ( not that people would stop killing each other) they'll simply go back to the rock to bash in our brains, and yes I know .........it's difficult to kill so many so fast.....with a rock.
TMCTLT Offline
#198 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
teedubbya wrote:
your folks were transgendered?




No....but my Dad could be a D*ck....@ times
teedubbya Offline
#199 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
TMCTLT wrote:
No....but my Dad could be a D*ck....@ times



LOL


His adams apple didn't fall from the tree though?
DrafterX Offline
#200 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
gummy jones wrote:
keep in mind that no amount of physical mutilation or daydreaming/wishful thinking changes someones chromosomes



true... true.... but if someone's willing to lop off their whacker then I'm OK with them using the Lady's Room... gotta draw the line somewhere... Mellow
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
5 Pages<12345>