America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

uncleb,

I may have not made myself clear. I did not mean they don’t have the right to voice their opinion, I simply mean that someone whose profession is to fight and possibly die for my freedom is more qualified to speak about war than anyone else.

An anology: If you want to discuss laws speak to a lawyer, if you want to discuss war… speak to a veteran.

Uncleb; Amen to that.

John, the reason so many on this board attack what you say is due to the overwhelmingly negative tones of your posts. You write just enough to leave the impression that you do dislike this country.
It's one thing to be anti-conservative. It's entirely different to come off as anti-American.
And many of your posts reek of the latter.

It doesn't make it so, but appearance is everything.

Sylance, nice misinformation campaign. Read the first. It is a direct description of what the 'stamp' portrays. An unflattering picture of my country.

I condemn the leadership of this country. That's what I said in the second quotation. Your point? Are you unaware that we live in a free society?

Why do I have to praise the military? We AREN'T TALKING ABOUT THE MILITARY PEOPLE AS INDIVIDUALS! WE ARE TALKING ABOUT POLICY CHOICES! The thick neofascist heads, deafened by the sound of dragging knuckles, can't seem to process that most simple point.

Neofascism is alive and well in this thread. It would be just hilariously pathetic if it wasn't for folks like Ashcroft who are encouraged by this drivel.

Once again, usahog has heaped a false accusation upon me, and doesn't have the balls to either authenticate his accusations or retract and apologize. Real lack of character, bro. And, when you say that military personnel would commit assault and battery simply because I disagree with the president's policy, you insult the military. Serious insult. Do YOU think they all agree with the President? Hardly.

Yes, ask the refugee, the victim, the family and loved ones of the dead...they are as much a part of war as the veteran. Also, ask the countless veterans who oppose this war. What about them? Oh, I forgot, it is only the neofacist folks like usafraudhog who count. Ha! Give me a break.

Tailgater, that is just a pathetic take on things here. You only target your remarks at me. Never at others. That makes you just as ridiculous of a character as the rest of these neofascist buffoons. I actually thought your knuckles hung just below your midthigh. But now I suspect they're on the ground as well.

Again John.. you are what you are..

jdrabinski "Quote"
“I condemn my country because the current leadership is an absolute embarrassment”
Catch it hear from the Horses A$$ I mean Mouth

http://www.cigarbid.com/...ay=0000000015436#147649

Now tell me the difference because Webster thinks to Differ with you!!!!

con•demn

Pronunciation: (kun-dem'),
1. to express an unfavorable or adverse judgment on; indicate strong disapproval of; censure.
2. to pronounce to be guilty; sentence to punishment: to condemn a murderer to life imprisonment.
3. to give grounds or reason for convicting or censuring: His acts condemn him.
4. to judge or pronounce to be unfit for use or service: to condemn an old building.
5. U.S. Law.to acquire ownership of for a public purpose, under the right of eminent domain: The city condemned the property.
6. to force into a specific state or activity: His lack of education condemned him to a life of menial jobs.
7. to declare incurable.

de•nounce

Pronunciation: (di-nouns'),
1. to condemn or censure openly or publicly: to denounce a politician as morally corrupt.
2. to make a formal accusation against, as to the police or in a court.
3. to give formal notice of the termination or denial of (a treaty, pact, agreement, or the like).
4. Archaic.to announce or proclaim, esp. as something evil or calamitous.
5. Obs.to portend.

You Said it just a few months back.. the link is above.. and you have got to be on Drugs to think I do not have a set of Balls to not make my point with you....
and again I did not say anything about my Military Brothers and Sisters that would not be true in the above.. take it for what you want you seem to have a twisted way of viewing everything anyways!!!!!!

Now Again I Suggest you get help for that double personality your seeming to have there.. either that or Lay off the computer when your on the Sauce because you seem to have Short Term Memory Loss when you think it will go in your Favor!!!!! ever think of switching Career's you would work out well with the ACLU Legal System!!!!!!!

Hog

You Stated You Condemn your Country..this being the United States???? when you Condemn your Country... Just as I stated in the Very First thread when you stated that... You Also Condemn the Military Members of this Country because They/We are the Backbone of the Sovernty of this Great Country you so Condemn... you Did not Say you condemn Bush for this Country.. you Stated you "Condemn your Country" So John don't try and change this around to anything but the fact of the Statement you made.. and I have said lay off the Sauce because it seems you cannot keep up with your Own Drivil you make... everything you have said in the last 5 months have been all Negative towards anything Positive...and when you made that Statement it went stright to my Feelings Personnaly so I know where you stand and so doesn't many others here from your Public Display and actions... Now I've answered your question I've shown you your Proof... do me the Honor of staying away from my Postings because all you want to do is Create and Stir ****!!!!!!

Hog

usahog, for the hundredth time, that quotation means that the leadership is condemned. I condemn my country's actions. Yep. Sorry you can't handle dissent.

Give me a break, Tailgater. You haven't a clue. 'Resorted to namecalling.' That's about what you've done with me, so it is amusing to see you snoot from the highground. Face it: conservatives here are intolerant of different views. Why not admit that? Why not say 'we'd prefer to have only conservatives here'? I've seen few 'retorts' to my points, unless by 'retort' you mean a personal attack...attacks that are hilarious, not irksome, especially since they are directed against a profession, not a person, and always display in the most blatant terms nothing but envy. Transparent.

Envy?
Somebody had a full bowl of EGO this morning.

So tell me, are the attacks "personal" or are they aimed at your profession? You've contradicted yourself.

As for the profession, the reason for the disdain is clear. Professors play an important role in shaping young minds. When all the facts are laid out it allows students to form their own opinions. When very one-sided, it skews their perception of reality.

Let's face it, if trash collectors were liberal, nobody would care because they don't interact with our youths (yoots?). Professors who abuse their pulpit are committing a heinous, self serving act that should be revealed. You, more than anybody on these boards, should speak out against such professors. Rather, you defend them. Deplorable.

But remember this, too, professor.
I've attacked your position on many subjects. But I never attacked you, the person.

And now I don't need to.
You have revealed yourself as something far worse than I could ever describe with any type of insult.

I guess a "thank you" is in order...

Love.

Professor John

We do not want you to leave the board as you intimated in one of your whinings! You provide entertainment with your psycho liberal babble.........far out of touch with the real world!

Happy Holidays

Charlie

osage, what makes you think I am living through my father's deeds? If you're going to say something like that, I expect you can explain yourself. Merely using an example. That's different than living through, you know.

I've done a lot. Email me if you'd like a list, ok?