teedubbya wrote:I think you are all wet Tail and you are letting your bias taint you.
Romney was wrong on the small point and correct on the larget point. pretty simple.
And Romney didn't follow the rules of the debate as agreed upon by both parties. he had no intention to. Neither did obama. obama was just more graceful when asked to. Romney felt the need to be more aggressive.
thats neither good nor bad ... just my opinion. we all have them. Don't mistake yours as fact.
Both candidates failed to follow the rules. Agreed. Let's move on from this point.
The moderator interjected her own brand of fact check. Even if it were accurate AND relevant, it can and did impact the tone of the debate. It also affected the results.
When Candy first interrupted Romney to state that the transcript did in fact contain "act of terror", I assumed she was correct and that the information was damning towards Romney's argument.
And I'm biased, as you have pointed out.
I'm in favor of Romney. I want Obama out of office.
Yet I felt that Romney had his information somehow wrong. that the President must have called the attacks an "act of terror" because it was in the transcript from the Rose Garden address one day after.
You don't see this as an issue. Even though it had a major impact on the debate. A debate that is supposed to be between the candidates, not the candidates and the moderator.
I find your apathy to be naive. But no harm. You're probably in the majority here. Which makes this an even more egregious breach of protocol.
