America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by DrafterX. 162 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234
At what point is does she and her attorney get arrested???
Abrignac Offline
#151 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
DrMaddVibe wrote:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/422863/bill-clinton-pardon-classified-documents


The big difference being that Hillary was anointed the rest were not.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#152 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,444
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0QQ0BW20150821
DrMaddVibe Offline
#153 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,444
What Does Joe Biden Know?

As the vice president edges toward a presidential run, is he banking on further public disclosures to discredit the frontrunner?


Yuri Gripas / Reuters

YONI APPELBAUM AUG 26, 2015

As Joe Biden edges closer to a presidential run, there’s no shortage of theories as to what he’s up to. Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton has built a commanding lead in the national polls, giving Biden little apparent space to gain traction. Perhaps he’s counting on the early-primary state of South Carolina to provide a critical boost. He might be banking on appearing as a stronger general-election candidate than any of his potential rivals in the primary race. Maybe after spending the past 42 years of his life running for elective office, he just can’t stop.

But there’s one intriguing theory that has so far garnered little attention: What if Biden knows something about Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton that the rest of us don’t?

After jumping to what seemed a prohibitively large early lead, Clinton has stumbled in recent months. Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, hardly the most charismatic politician, has emerged as a viable challenger, generating enormous enthusiasm on the campaign trail, and surging ahead in polling averages in New Hampshire.


Clinton, meanwhile, is battling a steady drip of negative headlines and revelations stemming from her use of a private email address and server during her term as secretary of state. Investigators have found that some emails contained information that was later classified, and media reports have suggested that some of this information may have been considered classified at the time it was shared, even if it hadn’t yet been labeled that way.

The emails that Clinton gave to the State Department are now being released in tranches every 30 days. Her server has been turned over to the Justice Department, which is reportedly optimistic that it can recover at least some of the emails that Clinton had deleted. No one knows what the emails that have not yet been released may contain.

No one, that is, outside of the administration. Those on the other end of Clinton’s correspondence presumably retain their own records of their exchanges. The White House has reportedly monitored the situation since before the questions over Clinton’s email became public. And the State Department has assigned a team to sort through the emails, reviewing them for classified information.

Clinton, and her loyalists, insist that the email probe is a distraction, and that there is no evidence that she deliberately broke any rules, much less violated the law. And so far, those claims have been borne out by each new round of disclosures.


If that’s not the case, though—if the emails contain revelations that are embarrassing, or worse—there’s a limited number of people who might be in a position to know it. Clinton’s own aides top the list. So do various White House officials.

And then, of course, there’s the State Department. Biden forged many relationships during his long tenure in the Senate, and State is chock full of longtime friends and former aides. The current deputy secretary of state, to choose the most prominent example, is Antony Blinken. He was hired as the staff director of the Senate’s foreign relations committee in 2002, and senior adviser to its senior Democratic member: Joe Biden. He stuck with Biden through the 2008 campaign, first becoming his national security adviser in the White House, then moving over to become Obama’s deputy national security adviser in 2013, and finally taking up his current role at the State Department in 2015. “I have now had the good fortune to work alongside Tony Blinken for many years,” Biden said when he was nominated for the State Department position. “He is a good man. I’m proud of him.”

There’s no reason to think that Blinken, or any of Biden’s other contacts within the White House or the national-security establishment, have shared with the vice president any information to which they’re privy. In fact, in late June, Blinken and his wife, another former Biden aide who’s now an assistant secretary of state, both gave the maximum allowable donation of $2,700 to Clinton’s campaign.

But if Biden seems more confident than most pundits that Hillary Clinton’s nomination isn’t inevitable, it may reflect more than his natural ebullience and legendary optimism. It may be a sign that he’s banking on voters learning things that he already knows.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/08/joe-biden-hillary-clinton-email/402448/
DrafterX Offline
#154 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
poor Joe.... he just made Clinton's list... Sad
DrMaddVibe Offline
#155 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,444
Sources: Clinton email markings changed to hide classified info

By Catherine Herridge

Published September 01, 2015FoxNews.com

EXCLUSIVE: At least four classified Hillary Clinton emails had their markings changed to a category that shields the content from Congress and the public, Fox News has learned, in what State Department whistleblowers believed to be an effort to hide the true extent of classified information on the former secretary of state’s server.

The changes, which came to light after the first tranche of 296 Benghazi emails was released in May, was confirmed by two sources -- one congressional, the other intelligence. The four emails originally were marked classified after a review by career officials at the State Department. But after a second review by the department's legal office, the designation was switched to "B5" -- also known as "deliberative process," which refers to internal deliberations by the Executive Branch. Such discussions are exempt from public release.

The B5 coding has the effect, according to a congressional source, of dropping the email content "down a deep black hole."

According to recent congressional testimony, at least one of the lawyers in the office where the changes were made is Catherine “Kate” Duval, who now handles the release of documents to the Benghazi select committee and once worked for the same firm as Clinton's private attorney David Kendall.

Fox News is told there were internal department complaints that Duval, and a second lawyer also linked to Kendall, gave at the very least the appearance of a conflict of interest during the email review. A State Department spokesman did not dispute the basic facts of the incident, confirming to Fox News the disagreement over the four classified emails as well as the internal complaints. But the spokesman said the concerns were unfounded.

The whistleblowers told intelligence community officials that they did not agree with the B5 changes, and the changes had the effect of shielding the full extent of classified content on the server. The incident was referenced in a Washington Times report mid-August, but this is the first time fuller details have been available. Because the emails are now marked B5, or deliberative, it is impossible to know the content and relevance to the congressional and FBI investigations.

The internal State Department disagreement was so significant that it rose to the level of Under Secretary for Management Patrick Kennedy, who is deeply involved in the email controversy, as Clinton's server arrangement required his formal signoff or tacit approval. Asked who signed off on the private server on Tuesday, State Department spokesman Mark Toner said, "I personally don't know."

Conservative group Judicial Watch, which has more than a dozen civil suits in federal courts, is now seeking a deposition of Kennedy in a case scrutinizing Clinton aide Huma Abedin’s controversial status as a special government employee (SGE). “All these issues fall under his responsibility,” Judicial Watch investigator Chris Farrell said.

Asked to respond to the allegations, State Department spokesman John Kirby said, “the Department has complete confidence that its attorneys -- who are almost exclusively career Department lawyers -- perform to the highest professional and ethical standards, including in connection with the review and release of Secretary Clinton’s emails.” A State Department official added that the lawyers do not have the final say on the codes, emphasizing it is a “multi-step review.”

On the appearance of a conflict of interest, Kirby defended Duval as “an exceptional professional and has the Department's utmost confidence … No one at the Department should, in addition to this burden, have her integrity or her excellent work ethic impugned.” And on the connection to Clinton attorney Kendall, “the mere fact of working at a firm does not itself constitute a conflict of interest. This is a large firm, and we are not aware that any counsel working on Clinton-related matters at the Department did so prior to joining the Department.”

A search of this week’s 7,000-page release found 694 emails with the B5 coding, about 10 percent of the total.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/01/sources-clinton-email-markings-changed-to-hide-contents-shielding-extent/
DrafterX Offline
#156 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
I told you guys... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#157 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
What does it matter?
DrafterX Offline
#158 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Hillary lied... people died... and stuff... Mellow
gummy jones Offline
#159 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
teedubbya wrote:
What does it matter?


at this point, what difference really does it make Sickquot;
DrafterX Offline
#160 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
that's what they want you to think... but even if it wasn't marked 'classified' (which none of it is. the term is Top Secret or a variation of) at the time it was sent she still had possession of 'classified' info on her personal server... there used to be a phrase that said 'ignorance is no excuse' or somethin like that... Mellow
DrMaddVibe Offline
#161 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,444
Koch Bros have that kinda change in their pockets!

http://radaronline.com/celebrity-news/hillary-clinton-hacked-emails-sale/
DrafterX Offline
#162 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
it was just a matter of time.... Mellow



I got ten bucks.. anyone else want to chip in..?? Huh
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234