TMCTLT wrote:Sooooo I take it none of these homo / lesbian folks have had sex yet? Don't you find it hypocritical that our Houses of Congress starts each session with a prayer? Yet they can @ the same time let the Atheists have their way with an entire country? The federal government and it's courts had NO right getting involved in what should've been States Rights cases. Where are they when it comes to enforcing our 2nd Amendment right across the nation? It is only because we have elected officials and judges who are homosexuals and lesbians that this is being forced on an entire nation. This entire ****storm has been sold by NOT giving a voice to the countless millions who were/are NOT on board with this legislation, the only group who get a voice are those accusing everyone who doesn't agree with them of being bigots and haters etc. and that's just simply not true. Apparently you cannot have a differing opinion any longer in this country without extremists getting the liberal medias attention and flaming anyone involved. In fact I challenge ANY of you to find businesses in the country who had signage in their window stating that they DON'T SERVE GAYS, it was ONLY when it became their ( the rainbow coalition ) agenda and platform to FORCE anyone who didn't cheer their decision and CHOICE of a same sex mate that ALL HELL broke loose. And for all you cheerleaders who say she should be fired or jailed for her stand on breaking a law that should never have been THRUSTED on the American people to begin with and the media has certainly been complicit in this.
I wish you'd break long posts a little cuz then I might reply to more than I am going to now...
Your first sentence (...had sex yet) leads me to think you misunderstood my comment about the clerk having sex "outside of marriage". I did not mean before marriage, I meant with others WHILE married. Adultery. A moral transgression in her own religion. Who is this "sinner", this adulterer, to decide for others what is moral Christian behavior?
With that alone, she gets no sympathy as a law breaker standing hypocritically on religious and moral objections.
Random replies: you actually are allowed to have any differing opinion you'd like, even if it is that you believe some laws of the land are wrong. Unfortunately, you (and she) are not allowed to dispense justice as you see fit...or as you think the laws SHOULD be.
People who do not agree with the law are not bigots. But people who act to block fellow Americans from exercising their equal and protected rights are bigots. She fits that second category.
I am sorry Paul, I simply can't read another rambling rant and intelligently respond with my differing opinion unless you calm down and break it into a series of readable points.