If the Dem administration was as recent as either Carter or Obama, then I can say that I would probably be 95% against what they did in office. .
Probably more so against policies in Obama's case, because the Obmunism pushed on America is antithetical to liberty and the Constitution.
Clinton actually did some things I liked, but then he moved toward the center and actual compromise with Gingrich (that ain't happening now with the Dem party in D.C.) He wanted the line item veto, which I always thought was a good idea, but then it was ruled unconstitutional.
The site I quoted was from the U.S. 's own Social Security website I didn't "search" for anything radical and it took me all of 10 sec to see it listed and another 5 min to read it.
Ronnie is my hero as far as presidents go (he, Washington, Lincoln) and I don't consider it a put down in the least, so I am not a bit offended.
Hey I think R.R. giving amnesty was a colossal mistake and short sighted as that event caused even more illegals to flood the states when the fence was not built. If he was instrumental in raiding the SS funds, then that would be a black mark against him as well. But congress spends money, does it not? (especially the House where those bills originate).