America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by tonygraz. 185 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234
Obama gun control order: Here are 8 main provisions
CruzJ Offline
#151 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2014
Posts: 222
tonygraz wrote:
Banana clips ring a bell. I seem to remember that they had a 90 count one for the M-16/AR15 many moons ago.




90 round drums can still be purchased to this day. They're awesome. I own a 100 count.
tonygraz Offline
#152 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,320
Hey do what you want. Get your financial advice from TCBY.
TMCTLT Offline
#153 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
A little something from our Prez during his Town Hall address.....from The Daily Wire


This is his reply to a rape victim who had since armed herself.....


Obama guns
By:
Ben Shapiro
January 8, 2016

President Obama would rather disarm Americans than allow them to fight their rapists. That’s the takeaway message from a stunning exchange at Thursday night’s gun control townhall event on CNN. Kimberly Corban, a 2006 rape survivor, asked Obama why he wanted to crack down on guns when women can use guns to protect themselves from rapists:

As a survivor of rape and now a mother to two small children, you know it seems like being able to purchase a firearm of my choosing and being able to carry that where me and my family are – it seems like my basic responsibility as a parent at this point. I have been unspeakably victimized once already and I refused to let that happen again to myself or my kids. So why can’t your administration see that these restrictions that you’re putting to make it harder for me to own a gun or harder for me to take that where I need to be is actually just making my kids and I less safe?

After pattering on about his sympathy for Corban and his unearned and patronizing pride for her – no tears for her rape, notably – Obama denied that any of his actions would make it more difficult for her to obtain a weapon. He completely ignored that he, like other Democrats, fights concealed carry weapons permits at every turn. Then he got to his real point: women don’t deserve guns, because they are incapable of defending themselves:

There are always questions as to whether or not having a firearm in the home protects you from that kind of violence…What is true is that you have to be pretty well-trained in order to fire a weapon against someone who is assaulting you and catches you by surprise. What is also true is always that possibility that firearm in the home leads to a tragic accident.
Brewha Offline
#154 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
I saw the interview.
She was a wing nut.
TMCTLT Offline
#155 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Brewha wrote:
I saw the interview.
Our President is a wing nut.



Finally something we CAN agree on!!!!!
teddyballgame Offline
#156 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
Brewha wrote:
I saw the interview.
She was a wing nut.



Brewha.. did you see the CNN town hall? Where the president claimed that getting a gun was cheaper and quicker to get than a book?

Who is the wing nut?

Your prez is a pathetic pathological liar and you back him 100%
teedubbya Offline
#157 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
In fairness in some parts of Chicago that may be true. But for the most part it's silly.
Brewha Offline
#158 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
TMCTLT wrote:
I am so pitifully that I have to steal Wheelrites' tricks



Oh, my.....
Brewha Offline
#159 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
teddyballgame wrote:


Your prez is a pathetic pathological liar and you back him 100%


Ahha! He's not YOUR president because you're not from this country are you? I thought so.

So what country are you astroturfing for? Russa? El Salvador? Conservatoria?

We should build a wall for people like you.....
tonygraz Offline
#160 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,320
Actually a damn stolen gun on the street might just be cheaper than a book. Has anyone checked out the prices on college books lately ?
DrafterX Offline
#161 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,588
he didn't say text book... Not talking

it was a very silly thing to say... Mellow
teddyballgame Offline
#162 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
Brewha wrote:
Ahha! He's not YOUR president because you're not from this country are you? I thought so.

So what country are you astroturfing for? Russa? El Salvador? Conservatoria?

We should build a wall for people like you.....




You mean "round people up like me?".

FDR did that to Japanese Americans and your side LOVES FDR.
That was the DEMOCRATS doing that, not the Republicans.

Naw, I impeached this imbecile long ago. If the Rep party had any stones they would have had impeachment trials long ago.

The fact still remains that you and your ilk back him 100%.

At what price liberty my friend?
teedubbya Offline
#163 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Impeachment should t be something you want to do every time the other party is in office.
DrafterX Offline
#164 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,588
Think
So, if Hillary gets elected and then gets prosecuted for her crimes can she pardon herself..?? Huh
frankj1 Offline
#165 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
teddyballgame wrote:
You mean "round people up like me?".

FDR did that to Japanese Americans and your side LOVES FDR.
That was the DEMOCRATS doing that, not the Republicans.

Naw, I impeached this imbecile long ago. If the Rep party had any stones they would have had impeachment trials long ago.

The fact still remains that you and your ilk back him 100%.

At what price liberty my friend?

meh. Ike didn't round up Mexicans, he had them forcibly removed from the U.S.

Trump wants to recreate that action...I believe your lead 2 to 1. Maybe 3 to 1 cuz of the deporting thing.

I can't speak for anyone else but you do know I am glad you're back.
DrafterX Offline
#166 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,588
frank loves teddy.. frank loves teddy... Laugh
frankj1 Offline
#167 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
DrafterX wrote:
frank loves teddy.. frank loves teddy... Laugh

it is stranger than fiction, but I happen to like that guy.

We probably couldn't agree on where to get lunch, but we get along.
teedubbya Offline
#168 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Joni loves Chachi
frankj1 Offline
#169 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
teedubbya wrote:
Joni loves Chachi

I heard Joni was missing
DrafterX Offline
#170 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,588
Laugh
teedubbya Offline
#171 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Maybe she's with CROS.
DrafterX Offline
#172 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,588
poor CROS... Sad
teedubbya Offline
#173 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Poor Joni
teedubbya Offline
#174 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Chachi lucked out though
teddyballgame Offline
#175 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
teedubbya wrote:
Impeachment should t be something you want to do every time the other party is in office.



No, but impeachment should be brought up when a president abuses his office as this one has done.

Using the IRS to target citizens

How many times has he, by fiat, chosen which parts of laws he will enforce and which parts he will ignore outright?

anyway, it ain't gonna happen.

frank, glad to see you too. We would totally agree on lunch.

Unless you were a vegetarian, in that case I would throw a side of beaf on your birkenstocks.
cacman Offline
#176 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
teddyballgame wrote:
No, but impeachment should be brought up when a president abuses his office as this one has done.

The wife of a former impeached President that where both broke when they left the White House was somehow made Secretary of State where she lost $6 Billion in taxpayer dollars, is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans and the fall of a US Embassy due to illegal arms sales, and was caught using a private unsecure Email server and trying to wipe it clean to cover her tracks while lying under oath. And people still want her to be President??? Bring in the shady operations of the Clinton Foundation on top of it all, and they both should be in jail for treason.

Ironic that Nixon was given a pardon while a lawyer who was thrown off the Watergate investigation for unethical practices and is currently running for President will probably be given a pardon as well.

Now tell me again that our guberment isn't corrupt. We are under attack from within by politicians with heavily armed security, and they want to restrict the people's gun rights??? WTF!
gummy jones Offline
#177 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
cacman wrote:
The wife of a former impeached President that where both broke when they left the White House was somehow made Secretary of State where she lost $6 Billion in taxpayer dollars, is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans and the fall of a US Embassy due to illegal arms sales, and was caught using a private unsecure Email server and trying to wipe it clean to cover her tracks while lying under oath. And people still want her to be President??? Bring in the shady operations of the Clinton Foundation on top of it all, and they both should be in jail for treason.

Ironic that Nixon was given a pardon while a lawyer who was thrown off the Watergate investigation for unethical practices and is currently running for President will probably be given a pardon as well.

Now tell me again that our guberment isn't corrupt. We are under attack from within by politicians with heavily armed security, and they want to restrict the people's gun rights??? WTF!


hilary 2016
change you can trust, trust us
TMCTLT Offline
#178 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
With the knowledge that several internet browser companies have happily assisted Barry and Co. with their agenda of collecting date bites on ALL Americans, they're apparently also happy to help with his gun control agenda. I've also visited other online sites where guys had posted video results of how certain ammo performed on varying target materials. None of their links worked anymore

http://liberty247.net/is-youtube-censoring-gun-related-videos-to-guns/



I've seen a number of this guys and his son's videos where they rated guns and different ammos and how they worked together....they did a Great job!!!
Censorship is such an ugly thing in a supposed Free country.
teedubbya Offline
#179 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Private entities can make their own decisions. The government apparently has nothing to do with this one. The country is still free.
teedubbya Offline
#180 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
And the videos are pretty decent.
TMCTLT Offline
#181 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
teedubbya wrote:
Private entities can make their own decisions. The government apparently has nothing to do with this one. The country is still free.



It's the incremental creep that worries me TW...and the willingness of these " private entities " as you put it to work with O Bummer on his gun scare tactics. It seems pretty clear to me they ( both these afformentioned companies as well as OBummer ) have the same agenda in mind....in this case censorship on what kind of information the public should be allowed to consume.
teedubbya Offline
#182 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Then you should legislate that private entities must keep stuff like this up.

This has nothing to do with the government.
teedubbya Offline
#183 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
And the first sentence was sarcasm.
teedubbya Offline
#184 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Get mad at you tube or google+ that's where your issue lies.

And since free market rules make them pay.
tonygraz Offline
#185 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,320
All he knows is "Thanks Obama".
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234