teedubbya wrote:Not to change. Egypt was taught to change. That was a snapshot in time. Maybe Israel should change? Maybe not.
Tanks on the border might be the equivalent of developed nukes. Whens it end? It this the proper cycle?
As for propaganda some countries have been swayed by the PLO etc., others by the Israeli propaganda machine no? which countries were swayed by the bogus propaganda and which were swayed by the correct propaganda?
Israeli tanks were not on the border, they actually marched to within 70 miles of Cairo! I think it took 6 days.
Syria had amassed tanks near the Golan Heights, if memory serves, during the same coordinated multi nation attack.
I think Israel can and would change when the need for strong defense and preemptive strikes is not as critical to their survival...not safety, but literally their survival.
Is there anyone that doubts Israel could have already wiped out much if not all Arab "problems" long ago? Wouldn't this indicate they do not intend to do so?
Is there anyone who doubts the Palestinians and several factions and Arab countries would have wiped out Israel if they had the ability, by now? Wouldn't this indicate they still intend to do so?
I'm really not debating/arguing against you, I'm stating how the situation looks to me in my biased view of the world, what I believe is the plan Hamas et al wish to bring to fruition, and how that determines responses to it.
I'm trying to tell ya, it can end when they loudly exclaim that Israel will be assured their right to exist will be respected. And then negotiate physical (and philosophical borders) for a new state of Palestine.
Negotiations will mean accepting the loss of certain demands. Israel has a history of trading land for peace...actually returning land taken in wars in which Israel was attacked! Unprecedented...
but not widely known.
Prolly due to their poor underfunded public relations machine...HA!