NC is a no scrum zone.

ZRX1200 wrote:

NC is a no double scrotum zone.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Does the name Cujo evoke any sighing quivers of angst?

bloody spaniard wrote:

my guess is Vics friends were attacked because they were gay. Of course Vic can not prove that in here, so we will all jump to the can't prove it didn't happen phase.

teedubbya wrote:

The question that has not been asked yet is:

Does this situation mean that Victor will soon get to make his first start for a gay rugby team? Opportunity knocks!

HockeyDad wrote:

The question that has not been asked yet is:

Does this situation mean that Victor will soon get to make his first start for a gay rugby team? Opportunity knocks!

HockeyDad wrote:

OK.

Or just when people give an honest opinion about "keeping it in the bedroom"?

Tell us exactly what you mean.

Because an honest, albeit lighthearted conversation regarding gay marriage should not provoke a violent reaction unless that person was pre-programmed to begin with.

Sounds more like you simply don't like hearing opinions that differ from yours on this subject.

tailgater wrote:

This is where you're closest. There is "should" and there's reality. In theory, everyone is allowed to say anything they want. The reality is that one influential person's statements can cause another person to be violent, or if you prefer, cause an already violent person to choose a target. Similarly, a large number of statements from non-influential people can do the same. This is not without example.

Does this mean you have to stop giving your opinion? No. If you personally do wish that you saw no outward sign of gay people (or cowboys fans) in this world (that's what a number of people on this forum have said) and you're willing to accept a small percentage of responsibility for violence specifically targeting gay people (or cowboys fans), then I see no problem. The sad reality is that there are idiots in this world.

victor809 wrote:

ROTFLMAO! Ya gotta love Victor for being so fervent about gay rights, abortion, global warming, women's issues, endangered species, anti- fast food activism... all of the officially- sanctioned, trendy agenda.

TW, were you a YMCA towel boy at the showers? You look familiar.

bloody spaniard wrote:

You can give your opinion but unless it is glowingly in favor of homosexuality, you are responsible for some percentage of violence specifically targeting gay people.

Ya'll better gay up!

HockeyDad wrote:

You can give your opinion but unless it is glowingly in favor of homosexuality, you are responsible for some percentage of violence specifically targeting gay people.

Ya'll better gay up!

HockeyDad wrote:

no, if it's passive aggressively marginalizing any group, you're responsible for some percentage of the violence targeting that group. That's not rocket science, nor is it necessarily a bad thing. But it sure as hell would be a breath of fresh air if people would sack up and accept their responsibility.

victor809 wrote:

no, if it's passive aggressively marginalizing any group, you're responsible for some percentage of the violence targeting that group. That's not rocket science, nor is it necessarily a bad thing. But it sure as hell would be a breath of fresh air if people would sack up and accept their responsibility.

victor809 wrote:

Your friends got beat up. From post #1 you've tried to shift the responsibility of that attack onto the Cigarbid community and the nation. These are not the perps you're looking for.

HockeyDad wrote:

That's exactly the type of sacking up I'd expect from a frenchman.

(see, now I'll willingly and proudly accept a percentage of responsibility next time a frenchy is beaten on the street)

victor809 wrote: